World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
43
Citations
8196
World Ranking
17109
National Ranking
381

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
47
Citations
9122
World Ranking
4828
National Ranking
255

Dianne E. Wiley publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne E. Wiley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Dianne E. Wiley D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne E. Wiley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dianne E. Wiley is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their work encompasses subfields such as Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's research mainly focuses on topics including Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies, Membrane Separation and Gas Transport, Membrane Separation Technologies, Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques, Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Wiley illustrate a broad engagement with contemporary challenges in energy conversion, catalysis, and membrane technologies. Notable publications include:

  • Recent advances in electrocatalytic chloride oxidation for chlorine gas production, 2021, Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • Comment on "How green is blue hydrogen?", 2022, Energy Science & Engineering
  • Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood waste for bio-energy with carbon capture and storage - New South Wales study, 2022, Energy Conversion and Management
  • Designing Co3O4/silica catalysts and intensified ultrafiltration membrane-catalysis process for wastewater treatment, 2021, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Review of modeling methodologies and state-of-the-art for osmotically assisted reverse osmosis membrane systems, 2024, Desalination

Wiley frequently collaborates with colleagues such as David Wang, G.A. Fimbres Weihs, Gholamreza Vahedi Sarrigani, Paul A. FitzGerald, and Amirali Ebrahimi Ghadi, indicating a well-established network within their research community.

Publication venues where Wiley's work frequently appears include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Journal of Membrane Science
  • Separation and Purification Technology

The breadth of Wiley's work spans various aspects of environmental and catalytic engineering challenges, highlighting interdisciplinary expertise integrating material chemistry with sustainable energy solutions and membrane technology innovation.

Best Publications

  • Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption

    Minh T. Ho;Guy W. Allinson;Dianne E. Wiley

  • Spacer characterization and pressure drop modelling in spacer-filled channels for ultrafiltration

    A.R. Da Costa;A.G. Fane;D.E. Wiley

  • Emerging CO2 capture systems

    J. C. Abanades;B. Arias;Anders Lyngfelt;Tobias Mattisson

  • Spiral wound modules and spacers - Review and analysis

    J. Schwinge;P.R. Neal;D.E. Wiley;D.F. Fletcher

  • Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules

    G.A. Fimbres-Weihs;D.E. Wiley

  • Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology

    Minh T. Ho;Guy W. Allinson;Dianne E. Wiley

  • CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel

    Z. Cao;D.E. Wiley;A.G. Fane

  • Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels

    Dianne E Wiley;David F Fletcher

  • Numerical study of mass transfer in three-dimensional spacer-filled narrow channels with steady flow

    G.A. Fimbres-Weihs;D.E. Wiley

  • Novel spacer design improves observed flux

    J. Schwinge;D.E. Wiley;A.G. Fane

  • Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Channel Walls. 2. Mass-Transfer Enhancement

    J. Schwinge;D. E. Wiley;D. F. Fletcher

  • A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules

    J. Schwinge;D.E. Wiley;D.F. Fletcher

  • Recent advances in electrocatalytic chloride oxidation for chlorine gas production

    Yihan Wang;Yangyang Liu;Dianne Wiley;Shenlong Zhao

  • Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Narrow Channel Walls. 1. Hydrodynamics

    J. Schwinge;D. E. Wiley;D. F. Fletcher

  • Comparison of MEA capture cost for low CO2 emissions sources in Australia

    Minh T. Ho;Minh T. Ho;Guy W. Allinson;Guy W. Allinson;Dianne E. Wiley;Dianne E. Wiley

  • Enzymatic and detergent cleaning of a polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane fouled with BSA and whey

    M.J. Muñoz-Aguado;D.E. Wiley;A.G. Fane

  • Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of post-combustion CO2 capture using MEA-solvent chemical absorption

    Giandomenico Ferrara;Giandomenico Ferrara;Andrea Lanzini;Pierluigi Leone;M.T. Ho;M.T. Ho

  • A computational fluids dynamics study of buoyancy effects in reverse osmosis

    D.F. Fletcher;D.E. Wiley

  • Optimal design of reverse osmosis module networks

    Fazilet Maskan;Dianne E. Wiley;Lloyd P. M. Johnston;David J. Clements

  • The effect of filament orientation on critical flux and particle deposition in spacer-filled channels

    P.R Neal;H Li;A.G Fane;D.E Wiley

  • Factors influencing critical flux in membrane filtration of activated sludge

    Sayed S Madaeni;Anthony G Fane;Dianne E Wiley

  • Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Aqueous Chemical Absorption

    Anggit Raksajati;Anggit Raksajati;Minh T. Ho;Minh T. Ho;Dianne E. Wiley;Dianne E. Wiley

  • Fouling Control in a Submerged Flat Sheet Membrane System: Part II—Two‐Phase Flow Characterization and CFD Simulations

    N. V. Ndinisa;A. G. Fane;D. E. Wiley;D. F. Fletcher

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony G. Fane
Anthony G. Fane University of New South Wales
David F. Fletcher
David F. Fletcher University of Sydney
Jie Bao
Jie Bao University of New South Wales
Sandra E. Kentish
Sandra E. Kentish University of Melbourne
Matteo C. Romano
Matteo C. Romano Polytechnic University of Milan
Colin A. Scholes
Colin A. Scholes University of Melbourne
Geoff W. Stevens
Geoff W. Stevens University of Melbourne
Vicki Chen
Vicki Chen University of Queensland
Andrea Lanzini
Andrea Lanzini Polytechnic University of Turin
Thomas P. Davis
Thomas P. Davis University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Engineering and Technology often goes hand-in-hand with understanding business, operations, and digital trends. Today’s job market values professionals who blend technical expertise with management and communication skills.

Many students and working professionals choose to enhance their credentials with advanced business training. For those interested in leadership roles in manufacturing, logistics, or tech-driven environments, online mba in operations management programs offer specialized courses tailored to technology and engineering fields.

If you seek flexibility and affordability, consider a online mba under 35k. These programs provide a cost-effective path to earning a respected degree without compromising quality. For those hoping to accelerate their learning journey, there are also one year online mba programs no gmat, helping you fast-track your career with no standardized test barriers.

As digital communication grows, so does the need for tech-savvy marketers. Earning degrees in social media equips you with modern skills needed for brand management, digital strategy, and online engagement—crucial for today’s interconnected world.

Best Scientists Citing Dianne E. Wiley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles