World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
16903
World Ranking
4797
National Ranking
132

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
74
Citations
17230
World Ranking
829
National Ranking
21

Fernando Rubiera publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Rubiera sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 198 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Fernando Rubiera D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Rubiera sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen
  • Carbon dioxide

His primary areas of study are Adsorption, Chemical engineering, Coal, Thermogravimetric analysis and Carbon. His research on Adsorption focuses in particular on Activated carbon. His research ties Organic chemistry and Chemical engineering together.

His research in Coal intersects with topics in Combustion and Limiting oxygen concentration. His Thermogravimetric analysis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Surface modification, Thermogravimetry, Inert gas and Thermal analysis. His Carbon research incorporates themes from Waste management and Physisorption.

His most cited work include:

  • Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass (555 citations)
  • CO2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons (389 citations)
  • Surface modification of activated carbons for CO2 capture (353 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Adsorption, Chemical engineering, Coal, Combustion and Carbon. Fernando Rubiera studies Activated carbon which is a part of Adsorption. Fernando Rubiera mostly deals with Thermogravimetric analysis in his studies of Chemical engineering.

Fernando Rubiera has researched Coal in several fields, including Pyrolysis and Mineralogy. His work in the fields of Combustion, such as Char, Combustibility and Pulverized coal-fired boiler, intersects with other areas such as Flow. The Carbon study which covers Inorganic chemistry that intersects with Porosity.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Adsorption (40.11%)
  • Chemical engineering (36.72%)
  • Coal (35.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Adsorption (40.11%)
  • Activated carbon (19.77%)
  • Waste management (20.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Fernando Rubiera mostly deals with Adsorption, Activated carbon, Waste management, Pulp and paper industry and Flue gas. The concepts of his Adsorption study are interwoven with issues in Biogas, Water vapor, Carbon, Chemical engineering and Process engineering. His Carbon course of study focuses on Hydrogen and Pyrolysis and Phenol formaldehyde resin.

His Chemical engineering study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Mass transfer, Chromatography, Organic chemistry, Carbon dioxide and Relative humidity. In his research, Gas composition is intimately related to Sawdust, which falls under the overarching field of Waste management. His Pulp and paper industry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Heat of combustion, Pellets and Torrefaction.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Grindability and combustion behavior of coal and torrefied biomass blends. (73 citations)
  • Biomass devolatilization at high temperature under N2 and CO2: char morphology and reactivity. (70 citations)
  • Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations (63 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen
  • Carbon dioxide

His primary scientific interests are in Adsorption, Chemical engineering, Pulp and paper industry, Sorption and Activated carbon. In the subject of general Adsorption, his work in Freundlich equation is often linked to Bulk density, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His Chemical engineering study combines topics in areas such as Organic chemistry, Carbon dioxide and Chromatography.

His studies deal with areas such as Lignocellulosic biomass, Biofuel, Syngas and Wood gas generator as well as Pulp and paper industry. His Activated carbon research incorporates elements of Waste management, Biogas, Porous medium and Diffusion. Fernando Rubiera has included themes like Scientific method, Mass transfer and Carbon in his Waste management study.

Best Publications

  • Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass

    B. Arias;C. Pevida;J. Fermoso;M.G. Plaza

  • Thermal behaviour and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co-combustion

    M.V. Gil;D. Casal;C. Pevida;J.J. Pis

  • CO2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons

    M.G. Plaza;C. Pevida;A. Arenillas;F. Rubiera

  • Surface modification of activated carbons for CO2 capture

    C. Pevida;M.G. Plaza;B. Arias;J. Fermoso

  • Hypercrosslinked organic polymer networks as potential adsorbents for pre-combustion CO2 capture

    Claudia F. Martín;Ev Stöckel;Rob Clowes;Dave J. Adams

  • Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: Comparison of different regeneration strategies

    M. G. Plaza;Susana Garcia;F. Rubiera;J. J. Pis

  • Valorisation of spent coffee grounds as CO2 adsorbents for postcombustion capture applications

    M.G. Plaza;A.S. González;C. Pevida;J.J. Pis

  • Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture

    A.S. González;M.G. Plaza;F. Rubiera;C. Pevida

  • Mechanical durability and combustion characteristics of pellets from biomass blends

    M.V. Gil;P. Oulego;M.D. Casal;C. Pevida

  • Development of low-cost biomass-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture

    M.G. Plaza;C. Pevida;B. Arias;J. Fermoso

  • Simultaneous thermogravimetric–mass spectrometric study on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals

    A Arenillas;F Rubiera;J.J Pis

  • Developing almond shell-derived activated carbons as CO2 adsorbents

    M.G. Plaza;C. Pevida;C.F. Martín;J. Fermoso

  • Thermal behaviour during the pyrolysis of low rank perhydrous coals

    A Arenillas;F Rubiera;J.J Pis;M.J Cuesta

  • Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: Effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture

    M.G. Plaza;A.S. González;J.J. Pis;F. Rubiera

  • Effect of biomass blending on coal ignition and burnout during oxy-fuel combustion

    B. Arias;C. Pevida;F. Rubiera;J.J. Pis

  • Kinetics of CO2 adsorption on cherry stone-based carbons in CO2/CH4 separations

    N. Álvarez-Gutiérrez;M.V. Gil;F. Rubiera;C. Pevida

  • Single particle ignition and combustion of anthracite, semi-anthracite and bituminous coals in air and simulated oxy-fuel conditions

    Juan Riaza;Reza Khatami;Yiannis A. Levendis;Lucía Álvarez

  • High-pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke

    J. Fermoso;B. Arias;M.G. Plaza;C. Pevida

  • A comparison of different methods for predicting coal devolatilisation kinetics

    A. Arenillas;F. Rubiera;C. Pevida;J.J. Pis

  • Oxy-fuel combustion of coal and biomass blends

    Juan Riaza;M. V. Gil;L. Álvarez;C. Pevida

  • Breakthrough adsorption study of a commercial activated carbon for pre-combustion CO2 capture

    Susana Garcia;M. V. Gil;C. F. Martin;J. J. Pis

Frequent Co-Authors

Covadonga Pevida
Covadonga Pevida Spanish National Research Council
J.J. Pis
J.J. Pis Spanish National Research Council
Ana Arenillas
Ana Arenillas Spanish National Research Council
Conchi O. Ania
Conchi O. Ania University of Orléans
Antonio B. Fuertes
Antonio B. Fuertes Spanish National Research Council
Mohamed Pourkashanian
Mohamed Pourkashanian University of Sheffield
Jenny M. Jones
Jenny M. Jones University of Leeds
Isabel Suárez-Ruiz
Isabel Suárez-Ruiz Spanish National Research Council
Alan Williams
Alan Williams University of Leeds
Antonio Morán
Antonio Morán University of Leon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Rubiera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles