World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 64 8175 7421 287 257 200 12287

Conchi O. Ania publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Conchi O. Ania between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Conchi O. Ania published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 14 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Conchi O. Ania: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 0
2004 7
2005 5
2006 7
2007 13
2008 7
2009 9
2010 11
2011 8
2012 18
2013 6
2014 15
2015 17
2016 16
2017 9
2018 10
2019 10
2020 13
2021 7
2022 7
2023 7
2024 6
2025 12
2026 2
Total 226
Download as CSV

Conchi O. Ania publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conchi O. Ania sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 200 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 200
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Conchi O. Ania D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Conchi O. Ania sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731 64
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Conchi O. Ania is affiliated with the University of Orléans in France and focuses their research primarily within Materials Science. Their work spans several subfields including Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist has contributed to numerous topics related to material sciences, notably:

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
  • Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research

Among the recent scientific papers involving their work are:

  • "How Reproducible are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?" (2022), published in Advanced Materials
  • "On the analysis of diffuse reflectance measurements to estimate the optical properties of amorphous porous carbons and semiconductor/carbon catalysts" (2020), published in Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry
  • "Exploiting the adsorption of simple gases O2 and H2 with minimal quadrupole moments for the dual gas characterization of nanoporous carbons using 2D-NLDFT models" (2020), published in Carbon
  • "Role of hydrogen bonding in the capture and storage of ammonia in zeolites" (2020), published in Chemical Engineering Journal
  • "Engaging nanoporous carbons in "beyond adsorption" applications: Characterization, challenges and performance" (2020), published in Carbon

Frequent collaborators include Alicia Gomis-Berenguer, Juan Matos, Adina Coroabǎ, J.B. Parra, and Corneliu S. Stan.

Their publications are often featured in journals and venues such as Carbon, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Advanced Materials, Chemical Engineering Journal, and Chemosphere.

Best Publications

  • The Large Electrochemical Capacitance of Microporous Doped Carbon Obtained by Using a Zeolite Template

    Conchi O. Ania;Volodymyr Khomenko;Encarnacion Raymundo-Pinero;José B. Parra

  • Effect of microwave and conventional regeneration on the microporous and mesoporous network and on the adsorptive capacity of activated carbons

    C.O. Ania;J.B. Parra;J.A. Menéndez;J.J. Pis

  • Waste-derived activated carbons for removal of ibuprofen from solution : Role of surface chemistry and pore structure

    Ana S. Mestre;João Pires;José M.F. Nogueira;Jose B. Parra

  • Importance of Structural and Chemical Heterogeneity of Activated Carbon Surfaces for Adsorption of Dibenzothiophene

    Conchi O Ania;Teresa J Bandosz

  • Microwave-induced regeneration of activated carbons polluted with phenol. A comparison with conventional thermal regeneration

    C.O. Ania;J.A. Menéndez;J.B. Parra;J.J. Pis

  • Transferable Force Field for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in Zeolites

    Almudena García-Sánchez;Conchi O. Ania;José B. Parra;David Dubbeldam

  • Deep eutectic solvents as both precursors and structure directing agents in the synthesis of nitrogen doped hierarchical carbons highly suitable for CO2 capture

    María C. Gutiérrez;Daniel Carriazo;Conchi O. Ania;Jose B. Parra

  • Dual gas analysis of microporous carbons using 2D-NLDFT heterogeneous surface model and combined adsorption data of N2 and CO2

    Jacek Jagiello;Conchi Ania;Jose B. Parra;Cameron Cook

  • Removal of an analgesic using activated carbons prepared from urban and industrial residues

    I. Cabrita;B. Ruiz;A.S. Mestre;I.M. Fonseca

  • H2, N2, CO, and CO2 sorption properties of a series of robust sodalite-type microporous coordination polymers.

    Jorge A. R. Navarro;Elisa Barea;Juan M. Salas;Norberto Masciocchi

  • Chapter 4 Surface chemistry of activated carbons and its characterization

    T.J. Bandosz;C.O. Ania

  • A computational study of CO2, N2, and CH4 adsorption in zeolites

    E. García-Pérez;J. B. Parra;C. O. Ania;A. García-Sánchez

  • Microwave-assisted regeneration of activated carbons loaded with pharmaceuticals.

    C.O. Ania;J.B. Parra;J.A. Menéndez;J.J. Pis

  • Surface modification of low cost carbons for their application in the environmental protection

    A. Arenillas;F. Rubiera;J.B. Parra;C.O. Ania

  • Understanding Gas-Induced Structural Deformation of ZIF-8

    Conchi O. Ania;E. García-Pérez;M. Haro;J. J. Gutiérrez-Sevillano

  • Metal-loaded polystyrene-based activated carbons as dibenzothiophene removal media via reactive adsorption

    C.O. Ania;T.J. Bandosz

  • Biomass waste-derived activated carbon for the removal of arsenic and manganese ions from aqueous solutions

    T. Budinova;D. Savova;B.Tsyntsarski;C.O. Ania

  • Guest-induced modification of a magnetically active ultramicroporous, gismondine-like, copper(II) coordination network.

    Jorge A R Navarro;Elisa Barea;Antonio Rodríguez-Diéguez;Juan M Salas

  • Role of activated carbon features on the photocatalytic degradation of phenol

    Leticia F. Velasco;José B. Parra;Conchi O. Ania

  • Adsorption of naphthalene from aqueous solution on activated carbons obtained from bean pods.

    Belen Cabal;Temenuzhka Budinova;Conchi O. Ania;Boyko Tsyntsarski

Frequent Co-Authors

J.J. Pis
J.J. Pis Spanish National Research Council
Sofia Calero
Sofia Calero Eindhoven University of Technology
Ana P. Carvalho
Ana P. Carvalho University of Lisbon
Teresa J. Bandosz
Teresa J. Bandosz City College of New York
Ana Arenillas
Ana Arenillas Spanish National Research Council
Fernando Rubiera
Fernando Rubiera Spanish National Research Council
Pedro Lavela
Pedro Lavela University of Córdoba
José L. Tirado
José L. Tirado University of Córdoba
María C. Gutiérrez
María C. Gutiérrez Spanish National Research Council
François Béguin
François Béguin Poznań University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which extend beyond traditional laboratory roles. For students interested in healthcare, understanding is it hard to become a pharmacist offers valuable insight into the rigorous education and training required to excel in pharmacy. This profession blends chemistry knowledge with patient care, making it a rewarding yet challenging choice.

For those fascinated by the forensic application of chemical principles, pursuing a forensic degree online can be an accessible way to enter the field while balancing other commitments. Forensic chemistry plays a crucial role in criminal investigations, linking scientific discovery directly to the justice system.

Expanding further into forensic sciences, individuals may explore careers like autopsy technicians. Understanding how much do autopsy techs make provides practical information on salary expectations and job outlook, guiding informed career decisions.

Additionally, those interested in the psychological aspects related to forensic work may consider a masters in forensic psychology online. This specialized degree merges chemistry’s analytical mindset with psychology, opening paths in behavioral analysis and criminal profiling.

Best Scientists Citing Conchi O. Ania

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles