World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 87 2390 2152 845 709 255 29205

Taner Yildirim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Taner Yildirim between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Taner Yildirim published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2008. 21 of the 303 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2008. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

303 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Taner Yildirim: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 6
1997 7
1998 7
1999 5
2000 15
2001 9
2002 11
2003 9
2004 14
2005 12
2006 11
2007 17
2008 18
2009 12
2010 13
2011 12
2012 7
2013 18
2014 10
2015 6
2016 7
2017 6
2018 8
2019 4
2020 8
2021 5
2022 4
2023 15
2024 15
2025 6
Total 303
Download as CSV

Taner Yildirim publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taner Yildirim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 255 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 255
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Taner Yildirim D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taner Yildirim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254 87
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For combining analytic theory, firstprinciples computations, and neutron scattering measurements to design, discover, and understand new materials with novel physics

Overview

Taner Yildirim is affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States. Their research focuses on areas within Materials Science and Chemistry, with an emphasis on Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. Additional areas of expertise include Mechanical Engineering, Process Chemistry and Technology, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Their work covers several specialized topics, notably:

  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Covalent Organic Framework Applications
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Taner Yildirim has contributed frequently to several key publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Chemistry of Materials
  • Neutron News

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Taner Yildirim illustrate research developments within porous materials and metal-organic frameworks, including:

  • "Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy," 2020, Science
  • "Optimization of the Pore Structures of MOFs for Record High Hydrogen Volumetric Working Capacity," 2020, Advanced Materials
  • "Fine-Tuning a Robust Metal-Organic Framework toward Enhanced Clean Energy Gas Storage," 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "Air-Stable Cu(I) Metal-Organic Framework for Hydrogen Storage," 2023, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • "A microporous aluminum-based metal-organic framework for high methane, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide storage," 2020, Nano Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include the following individuals:

  • Wei Zhou
  • Craig M. Brown
  • Hayden A. Evans
  • Gavin A. McCarver
  • Zeyu Deng

Among their recognitions, Taner Yildirim has been named a Fellow of the American Physical Society in 2008 for work combining analytic theory, first-principles computations, and neutron scattering measurements to explore new material physics.

Best Publications

  • Unusual and Highly Tunable Missing-Linker Defects in Zirconium Metal–Organic Framework UiO-66 and Their Important Effects on Gas Adsorption

    Hui Wu;Hui Wu;Yong Shen Chua;Yong Shen Chua;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Madhusudan Tyagi;Madhusudan Tyagi

  • Titanium-decorated carbon nanotubes as a potential high-capacity hydrogen storage medium.

    T. Yildirim;S. Ciraci

  • Methane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Current Records, Surprise Findings, and Challenges

    Yang Peng;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Ibrahim Eryazici;Joseph T. Hupp

  • Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Tool To Enable High-Throughput Screening of Nanoporous Crystals

    Yongchul G. Chung;Jeffrey Camp;Maciej Haranczyk;Benjamin J. Sikora

  • Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy

    Zhijie Chen;Penghao Li;Ryther Anderson;Xingjie Wang

  • Origin of the 150-K anomaly in LaFeAsO: competing antiferromagnetic interactions, frustration, and a structural phase transition.

    T. Yildirim

  • High-Capacity Methane Storage in Metal−Organic Frameworks M2(dhtp): The Important Role of Open Metal Sites

    Hui Wu;Wei Zhou;Taner Yildirim

  • Magnetically driven ferroelectric order in Ni3V2O8.

    G. Lawes;A. B. Harris;T. Kimura;N. Rogado

  • Enhanced H2 adsorption in isostructural metal-organic frameworks with open metal sites: strong dependence of the binding strength on metal ions.

    Wei Zhou;Hui Wu;Taner Yildirim

  • Hydrogen and Methane Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks: A High-Pressure Volumetric Study

    Wei Zhou;Hui Wu;Michael R. Hartman,†,‖ and;Taner Yildirim

  • Hydrogen storage in a prototypical zeolitic imidazolate framework-8.

    Hui Wu;Wei Zhou;Taner Yildirim

  • Exceptional Mechanical Stability of Highly Porous Zirconium Metal–Organic Framework UiO-66 and Its Important Implications

    Hui Wu;Hui Wu;Taner Yildirim;Taner Yildirim;Wei Zhou;Wei Zhou

  • Giant Anharmonicity and Nonlinear Electron-Phonon Coupling in MgB 2 : A Combined First-Principles Calculation and Neutron Scattering Study

    T. Yildirim;O. Gülseren;O. Gülseren;J. W. Lynn;C. M. Brown;C. M. Brown

  • Graphene oxide framework materials: theoretical predictions and experimental results.

    Jacob W. Burress;Srinivas Gadipelli;Srinivas Gadipelli;Jamie Ford;Jamie Ford;Jason M. Simmons

  • Exceptional CO2 capture in a hierarchically porous carbon with simultaneous high surface area and pore volume

    Gadipelli Srinivas;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Vaiva Krungleviciute;Zheng Xiao Guo;Taner Yildirim;Taner Yildirim

  • Carbon capture in metal–organic frameworks—a comparative study

    Jason M. Simmons;Hui Wu;Hui Wu;Wei Zhou;Wei Zhou;Taner Yildirim;Taner Yildirim

  • Tailoring of nanoscale porosity in carbide-derived carbons for hydrogen storage.

    Yury Gogotsi;Ranjan K Dash;Gleb Yushin;Taner Yildirim

  • Systematic study of adsorption of single atoms on a carbon nanotube

    Engin Durgun;S. Dag;V. M. K. Bagci;O. Gülseren

  • Transition Metal-Ethylene Complexes as High-Capacity Hydrogen Storage Media

    E. Durgun;S. Ciraci;W. Zhou;Taner Yildirim

  • Strong coupling of the Fe-spin state and the As-As hybridization in iron-pnictide superconductors from first-principle calculations.

    Taner Yildirim;Taner Yildirim

Frequent Co-Authors

Wei Zhou
Wei Zhou National Institute of Standards and Technology
Hui Wu
Hui Wu National Institute of Standards and Technology
Salim Ciraci
Salim Ciraci Bilkent University
Omar K. Farha
Omar K. Farha Northwestern University
Banglin Chen
Banglin Chen Fujian Normal University
Amnon Aharony
Amnon Aharony Tel Aviv University
Joseph T. Hupp
Joseph T. Hupp Northwestern University
Randall Q. Snurr
Randall Q. Snurr Northwestern University
Yun Liu
Yun Liu National Institute of Standards and Technology
Craig M. Brown
Craig M. Brown National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related career paths that blend science and practical application. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a pharmacist is a popular choice. To learn more about the necessary steps and qualifications, explore our how to become a pharmacist guide.

Alternatively, if you are drawn to forensic science, there are many opportunities to pursue specializations that connect chemistry with criminal justice. For example, an autopsy technician plays a crucial role in medical investigations, with decent salary prospects and growing demand. Detailed insights can be found in the autopsy technician salary overview.

To build the right skillset for forensic roles, pursuing education through the best online colleges for forensic science offers flexible and affordable options. These programs often prepare students for hands-on investigative careers involving chemicals and biological evidence.

For those interested in the psychological aspects of forensics, earning a masters in forensic psychology online can enhance career prospects in legal settings, mental health, and criminal profiling. This degree complements a chemistry background by adding behavioral insights to technical expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Taner Yildirim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles