World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 89 2178 1957 784 653 466 27317

Lukasz Wojtas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lukasz Wojtas between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lukasz Wojtas published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 40 papers a year. Output peaked at 103 publications in 2013. 19 of the 880 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 103. Peak 103 publications in 2013. 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 88 publications 2012: 73 publications 2013: 103 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 68 publications 2016: 57 publications 2017: 52 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 65 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
2004 2025

880 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lukasz Wojtas: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 4
2005 2
2006 7
2007 0
2008 11
2009 3
2010 29
2011 88
2012 73
2013 103
2014 49
2015 68
2016 57
2017 52
2018 44
2019 65
2020 44
2021 59
2022 40
2023 63
2024 10
2025 9
Total 880
Download as CSV

Lukasz Wojtas publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukasz Wojtas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 466 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265 466
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Lukasz Wojtas D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukasz Wojtas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235 89
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lukasz Wojtas is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans several fields with a particular focus on Materials Science and Chemistry, accumulating a substantial body of work emphasizing materials chemistry, organic chemistry, and inorganic chemistry.

Their primary research areas include:

  • Materials Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biomaterials

The main thematic topics covered in Lukasz Wojtas's research involve:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
  • Catalytic Alkyne Reactions
  • Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
  • Covalent Organic Framework Applications

Their publication record highlights frequent appearances in specific academic venues, including:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Angewandte Chemie
  • Chemistry - A European Journal
  • Chemical Science

Lukasz Wojtas's recent papers include:

  • "Efficient separation of xylene isomers by a guest-responsive metal-organic framework with rotational anionic sites," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "A Corrole-Based Covalent Organic Framework Featuring Desymmetrized Topology," 2020, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • "Nanospace Decoration with Uranyl-Specific 'Hooks' for Selective Uranium Extraction from Seawater with Ultrahigh Enrichment Index," 2021, ACS Central Science
  • "Asymmetric synthesis of sulfoximines, sulfonimidoyl fluorides and sulfonimidamides enabled by an enantiopure bifunctional S(VI) reagent," 2024, Nature Chemistry
  • "Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Nanowires on the Surface by Metallo-Supramolecular Truncated Cuboctahedra," 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations encompass:

  • Chuan Shan
  • Xiaodong Shi
  • Justin M. Lopchuk
  • Xiaohan Ye
  • Shengqian Ma

Best Publications

  • Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation

    Patrick Nugent;Youssef Belmabkhout;Stephen D. Burd;Amy J. Cairns

  • Postsynthetically Modified Covalent Organic Frameworks for Efficient and Effective Mercury Removal.

    Qi Sun;Briana Aguila;Jason Perman;Lyndsey D. Earl

  • Enhanced CO2 Binding Affinity of a High-Uptake rht-Type Metal-Organic Framework Decorated with Acylamide Groups

    Baishu Zheng;Junfeng Bai;Jingui Duan;Lukasz Wojtas

  • Supermolecular building blocks (SBBs) for the design and synthesis of highly porous metal-organic frameworks.

    Farid Nouar;Jarrod F. Eubank;Till Bousquet;Lukasz Wojtas

  • Covalent Organic Frameworks as a Decorating Platform for Utilization and Affinity Enhancement of Chelating Sites for Radionuclide Sequestration.

    Qi Sun;Briana Aguila;Lyndsey D. Earl;Carter W. Abney

  • Tunable Rare-Earth fcu-MOFs: A Platform for Systematic Enhancement of CO2 Adsorption Energetics and Uptake

    Dong-Xu Xue;Amy J. Cairns;Youssef Belmabkhout;Lukasz Wojtas

  • Crystal engineering of an nbo topology metal-organic framework for chemical fixation of CO2 under ambient conditions

    Wen-Yang Gao;Yao Chen;Youhong Niu;Kia Williams

  • Discovery and introduction of a (3,18)-connected net as an ideal blueprint for the design of metal–organic frameworks

    Vincent Guillerm;Łukasz J. Weseliński;Youssef Belmabkhout;Amy J. Cairns

  • Bio-inspired nano-traps for uranium extraction from seawater and recovery from nuclear waste

    Qi Sun;Briana Aguila;Jason Alexander Perman;Aleksandr S. Ivanov

  • Cocrystals of Quercetin with Improved Solubility and Oral Bioavailability

    Adam J. Smith;Padmini Kavuru;Lukasz Wojtas;Michael J. Zaworotko

  • Temperature and concentration control over interpenetration in a metal-organic material.

    JianJun Zhang;Lukasz Wojtas;Randy W. Larsen;Mohamed Eddaoudi

  • Highly Selective Carbon Dioxide Uptake by [Cu(bpy-n)2(SiF6)] (bpy-1 = 4,4′-Bipyridine; bpy-2 = 1,2-Bis(4-pyridyl)ethene)

    Stephen D. Burd;Shengqian Ma;Jason A. Perman;Benjamin J. Sikora

  • Supermolecular Building Blocks (SBBs) and Crystal Design : 12-Connected Open Frameworks Based on a Molecular Cubohemioctahedron

    Amy J. Cairns;Jason A. Perman;Lukasz Wojtas;Victor Ch. Kravtsov

  • Coformer Selection in Pharmaceutical Cocrystal Development: a Case Study of a Meloxicam Aspirin Cocrystal That Exhibits Enhanced Solubility and Pharmacokinetics

    Miranda L. Cheney;David R. Weyna;Ning Shan;Mazen Hanna

  • Templated Synthesis, Postsynthetic Metal Exchange, and Properties of a Porphyrin-Encapsulating Metal–Organic Material

    Zhenjie Zhang;Linping Zhang;Lukasz Wojtas;Patrick Nugent

  • Effects of Crystal Form on Solubility and Pharmacokinetics: A Crystal Engineering Case Study of Lamotrigine

    Miranda L. Cheney;Ning Shan;Elisabeth R. Healey;Mazen Hanna

  • Experimental Evidence for Cobalt(III)-Carbene Radicals: Key Intermediates in Cobalt(II)-Based Metalloradical Cyclopropanation

    Hongjian Lu;Wojciech I. Dzik;Xue Xu;Lukasz Wojtas

  • Structure―Stability Relationships in Cocrystal Hydrates: Does the Promiscuity of Water Make Crystalline Hydrates the Nemesis of Crystal Engineering?

    Heather D. Clarke;Kapildev K. Arora;Heather Bass;Padmini Kavuru

  • A Robust Molecular Porous Material with High CO2 Uptake and Selectivity

    Patrick S. Nugent;Vanessah Lou Rhodus;Tony Pham;Katherine Forrest

  • Selective Intramolecular C ? H Amination through the Metalloradical Activation of Azides: Synthesis of 1,3‐Diamines under Neutral and Nonoxidative Conditions

    Hongjian Lu;Huiling Jiang;Lukasz Wojtas;X. Peter Zhang

  • A Metal–Organic Framework Based Methane Nano‐trap for the Capture of Coal‐Mine Methane

    Zheng Niu;Xili Cui;Xili Cui;Tony Pham;Pui Ching Lan

  • Highly Asymmetric Intramolecular Cyclopropanation of Acceptor-Substituted Diazoacetates by Co(II)-Based Metalloradical Catalysis: Iterative Approach for Development of New-Generation Catalysts

    Xue Xu;Hongjian Lu;Joshua V. Ruppel;Xin Cui

Frequent Co-Authors

Shengqian Ma
Shengqian Ma University of North Texas
Michael J. Zaworotko
Michael J. Zaworotko University of Limerick
X. Peter Zhang
X. Peter Zhang Boston College
Xiaodong Shi
Xiaodong Shi University of South Florida
Mohamed Eddaoudi
Mohamed Eddaoudi King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Xin Cui
Xin Cui Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yu-Sheng Chen
Yu-Sheng Chen Nankai University
Tony Pham
Tony Pham University of South Florida
Brian Space
Brian Space University of South Florida
Jon C. Antilla
Jon C. Antilla Tianjin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various dynamic career paths, many of which offer specialized online degree options. For example, students interested in healthcare and pharmaceuticals might explore paths leading to becoming a pharmacist. Understanding how much does it cost to become a pharmacist is essential for budgeting and planning, as the investment in education directly impacts career prospects.

Alternatively, a career as a pharmaceutical sales representative blends science knowledge with communication skills. If you’re curious about the financial potential in this field, check out the insights on pharma sales rep salary to understand earning potential and growth opportunities.

For those drawn to forensic applications of chemistry, pursuing a forensic science online degree offers a flexible route to enter this field. Careers such as autopsy technicians demand a combination of scientific expertise and practical skills. To gauge job viability in this niche, it’s useful to explore typical autopsy technician salary along with required educational pathways.

Overall, online chemistry-related degrees provide affordable and accessible options for students aiming to enter these specialized professions. Researching salary expectations and educational costs beforehand ensures informed decisions about your studies and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Lukasz Wojtas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles