World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
75
Citations
21197
World Ranking
352
National Ranking
37

Peter C. Smith publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 371 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Peter C. Smith D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Peter C. Smith is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across several fields, primarily focusing on health professions, economics, econometrics and finance, and medicine.

Their work includes contributions in main fields of study such as:

  • Health Professions
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Medicine

Within these broader fields, Peter C. Smith's research has extended into more specific subfields, including:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacy

Their published work covers a range of main topics related to healthcare and economic evaluation:

  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Peter C. Smith has published in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Lancet
  • BMJ
  • Health Economics
  • Frontiers in Medicine
  • Automation in Construction

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter C. Smith include:

  • Computer vision-based interior construction progress monitoring: A literature review and future research directions, 2021, Automation in Construction
  • Work as a social determinant of health in high-income countries: past, present, and future, 2023, The Lancet
  • LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19, 2021, The Lancet
  • Lessons Learned During COVID-19 That Can Move Telehealth in Primary Care Forward, 2021, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
  • Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys, 2020, BMJ

Frequent collaborators in Peter C. Smith's research include:

  • David Haw
  • Giovanni Forchini
  • Katharina Hauck
  • Finn McGuire
  • Leigh Perreault

Best Publications

  • What works?Evidence-based policy and practice in public services

    Huw T.O. Davies;Sandra M. Nutley;Peter C. Smith

  • Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold

    Karl Philip Claxton;Stephen Martin;Marta O Soares;Nigel Rice

  • On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector

    Peter Smith

  • Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK.

    Maria Goddard;Peter Smith

  • Performance measurement for health system improvement : experiences, challenges and prospects

    Peter C. Smith;Elias Mossialos;Irene Papanicolas;Sheila Leatherman;Sheila Leatherman

  • Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology.

    S C Smith;D L Lamping;S Banerjee;R Harwood

  • Measuring Efficiency in Health Care: Analytic Techniques and Health Policy

    Rowena Jacobs;Peter C. Smith;Andrew Street

  • Technologies for global health

    Peter Howitt;Ara Darzi;Guang-Zhong Yang;Hutan Ashrafian

  • Does progress towards universal health coverage improve population health

    Rodrigo Moreno-Serra;Peter C Smith

  • Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly

    Unknown

  • Outcome‐related Performance Indicators and Organizational Control in the Public Sector1

    Peter Smith

  • Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom.

    Martin N. Marshall;Paul G. Shekelle;Huw T.O. Davies;Peter C. Smith

  • Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis

    Peter Smith

  • On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis

    Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro;Javier Salinas-Jimenez;Peter Smith

  • Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis

    Bruce Phillip Hollingsworth;Peter Smith

  • Rationing by waiting lists: an empirical investigation

    Stephen Martin;Peter C. Smith

  • Measuring efficiency in the public sector

    Peter Smith;David Mayston

  • Measuring the efficiency of public services: the limits of analysis

    Peter C. Smith;Andrew Street

  • Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services

    R A Carr-Hill;T A Sheldon;P Smith;S Martin

  • On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model

    Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro;Javier Salinas-Jiménez;Peter Smith

  • Does health care spending improve health outcomes? Evidence from English programme budgeting data.

    Stephen Martin;Nigel Rice;Peter C. Smith

  • Measuring efficiency in health care

    Rowena Jacobs;Peter C. Smith;Andrew Street

  • Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement

    Peter C. Smith;Elias Mossialos;Irene Papanicolas;Sheila Leatherman

  • Performance measurement for health system improvement: Targets and performance measurement

    Peter C. Smith;Elias Mossialos;Irene Papanicolas;Sheila Leatherman

  • Public Reporting on Quality in the United States and the United Kingdom: In Both Countries the Imperatives of Accountability and Quality Improvement Make the Wider Development and Implementation for Report Cards Inevitable

    Martin Marshall;Paul G. Shekelle;H. T O Davies;Peter C. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Rice
Nigel Rice University of York
Andrew Street
Andrew Street London School of Economics and Political Science
Mark Sculpher
Mark Sculpher University of York
Karl Claxton
Karl Claxton University of York
Nancy Devlin
Nancy Devlin University of Melbourne
Hugh Gravelle
Hugh Gravelle University of York
Jill Cook
Jill Cook La Trobe University
Elias Mossialos
Elias Mossialos London School of Economics and Political Science
Russell Mannion
Russell Mannion University of Birmingham
Trevor A Sheldon
Trevor A Sheldon Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring additional online degree options can greatly enhance your career prospects in the fields of economics and finance. Professionals interested in harnessing data can benefit from a business intelligence master's degree online, which prepares graduates for in-demand roles in data analysis and decision-making across industries.

For those seeking broader business expertise and leadership opportunities, pursuing a flexible mba no gmat allows for career advancement without standardized test hurdles. Many high-quality options are also budget-friendly, with strong programs available for those seeking an online mba under 25k.

The digital economy is quickly evolving, and expertise in social media is increasingly valuable. Consider expanding your skills by enrolling in a social media marketing degree online to gain practical tools for success in modern finance and business roles.

By combining core economics and finance education with specialized online degrees, you’ll be well-equipped for a variety of dynamic career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles