World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
104566
World Ranking
3799
National Ranking
104

Anthony Rodgers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 490 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Anthony Rodgers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony Rodgers is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research is focused within the broad field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, and Pharmacology.

The main topics covered in their work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Medication Adherence and Compliance, Treatment of Major Depression, and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rodgers include Aletta E. Schutte, Abdul Salam, John Chalmers, Markus P. Schlaich, and Anushka Patel.

Rodgers has published extensively in several well-known academic journals. Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • The Lancet
  • Hypertension

Some representative recent papers by Rodgers include:

  • Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019 (2020), Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis (2021), The Lancet
  • Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis (2021), The Lancet
  • Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020), Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Phase 2b Randomized Trial of the Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor MK-0616 (2023), Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study

    Gregory A. Roth;George A. Mensah;Catherine O. Johnson;Giovanni Addolorato

  • Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Anushka Patel;Stephen MacMahon;John Chalmers

  • Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease

    Majid Ezzati;Alan D. Lopez;Anthony Rodgers;Stephen Vander Hoorn

  • 1999 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION-INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

    M. Alderman;K. Arakawa;L. Beilin;J. Chalmers

  • Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack

    S. MacMahon;B. Neal;C. Tzourio;A. Rodgers

  • Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Dena Ettehad;Connor A Emdin;Amit Kiran;Simon G Anderson;Simon G Anderson

  • Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001.

    Carlene Mm Lawes;Stephen Vander Hoorn;Anthony Rodgers

  • Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

    Anthony Rodgers;Natalie Walker;S Schug;A McKee

  • Comparative quantification of health risks : global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors

    Majid Ezzati;Alan D Lopez;Anthony Rodgers;Christopher Jl Murray

  • Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review.

    Thaminda Liyanage;Thaminda Liyanage;Toshiharu Ninomiya;Vivekanand Jha;Vivekanand Jha;Vivekanand Jha;Bruce Neal

  • Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.

    Rory Collins;Christina Reith;Jonathan Emberson;Jane Armitage

  • Mobile phone‐based interventions for smoking cessation

    Robyn Whittaker;R Borland;Christopher Bullen;Ruey Lin

  • Blood Pressure and Stroke An Overview of Published Reviews

    Carlene M.M. Lawes;Derrick A. Bennett;Valery L. Feigin;Anthony Rodgers

  • Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging

    Rodgers A;Corbett T;Bramley D;Riddell T

  • Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial

    Caroline Free;Rosemary Knight;Steven Robertson;Robyn Whittaker

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with low dose aspirin: Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (PEP) trial

    J O'Brien;H Duncan;G Kirsh;V Allen

  • Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region.

    C. M. M. Lawes;A Rodgers;D. A. Bennett

  • Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors.

    Majid Ezzati;Stephen Vander Hoorn;Anthony Rodgers;Alan D Lopez

  • Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Xinfang Xie;Emily Atkins;Jicheng Lv;Jicheng Lv;Alexander Bennett

  • Worldwide Access to Treatment for End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

    T. Liyanage;T. Ninomiya;V. Jha

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health
Anushka Patel
Anushka Patel University of New South Wales
Stephen MacMahon
Stephen MacMahon University of Oxford
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Stephen Jan
Stephen Jan George Institute for Global Health
Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Cliona Ni Mhurchu University of Auckland
Vlado Perkovic
Vlado Perkovic George Institute for Global Health
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Giuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online programs can open diverse career opportunities in healthcare beyond becoming a physician. One in-demand field is medical administration, and many students look for medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid to help make their training more affordable. These programs offer flexible online learning and prepare graduates for essential roles in healthcare offices.

For those aiming for a nursing career, there are nursing schools that don’t require teas test, lowering barriers for students looking to begin their journey in nursing without additional standardized exams.

If your interests align with healthcare leadership, consider the range of healthcare administration programs available online. These fast-track degrees help prepare students for management and administrative roles in medical settings.

Registered nurses aiming to advance can benefit from asn to nurse practitioner programs, which allow students to bridge their qualification to graduate-level practice. These options make it possible to find the educational pathway that matches your aspirations and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Rodgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles