World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 907 904 49 49 106 9263
Psychology 32 10716 10033 616 601 81 10072

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne between 2014 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne published across 12 years, from 2014 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 20 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2014 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 2014: 1 publication 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 15 publications
2014 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne: publications per year, 2014 to 2025
Year Publications
2014 1
2015 5
2016 11
2017 14
2018 11
2019 16
2020 12
2021 15
2022 10
2023 8
2024 5
2025 15
Total 123
Download as CSV

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans several interconnected fields and topics within medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive processes, genetic influences, and neuroimaging methods. The main fields of study include Medicine and Neuroscience, supported by subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their scientific contributions cover a range of main topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne has coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators, including:

  • Ian B. Hickie
  • Naomi R. Wray
  • Sarah E. Medland
  • Mark J. Adams
  • Olivier Colliot

Their work has appeared in various scientific venues, with multiple publications in the following journals and repositories:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Nature Communications

Recent significant papers authored or coauthored by Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne include:

  • "The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex," 2020, Science
  • "Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer's disease implies an oligogenic architecture," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing," 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • "Genome-wide gene-environment analyses of major depressive disorder and reported lifetime traumatic experiences in UK Biobank," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression

    Naomi R. Wray;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Manuel Mattheisen;MacIej Trzaskowski

  • Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group.

    L Schmaal;D P Hibar;P G Sämann;G B Hall

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Laura K.M. Han;Richard Dinga;Richard Dinga;Tim Hahn;Christopher R.K. Ching

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder: findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    L. Schmaal;D.J. Veltman;T.G.M. van Erp;P.G. Sämann

  • A direct test of the diathesis-stress model for depression.

    L Colodro-conde;L Colodro-conde;B Couvy-duchesne;B Couvy-duchesne;Gu Zhu;W L Coventry

  • Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease implies an oligogenic architecture

    Qian Zhang;Julia Sidorenko;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Riccardo E. Marioni

  • Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 neuroticism-associated loci

    Daniel J. Smith;Valentina Escott-Price;Gail Davies;Mark E. S. Bailey

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • A Comparison of Ten Polygenic Score Methods for Psychiatric Disorders Applied Across Multiple Cohorts

    Guiyan Ni;Jian Zeng;Joana A. Revez;Ying Wang

  • The Genetics of the Mood Disorder Spectrum: Genome-wide Association Analyses of More Than 185,000 Cases and 439,000 Controls

    Jonathan R I Coleman;Héléna A Gaspar;Julien Bryois

  • Identifying the Common Genetic Basis of Antidepressant Response

    Oliver Pain;Karen Hodgson;Vassily Trubetskoy;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide study of depression identifies 697 associations implicating cell types and pharmacotherapies

    Unknown

  • Integrated analysis of environmental and genetic influences on cord blood DNA methylation in new-borns

    Darina Czamara;Gökçen Eraslan;Christian M Page;Christian M Page;Jari Lahti

  • Does Childhood Trauma Moderate Polygenic Risk for Depression? A Meta-analysis of 5765 Subjects From the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

    Peyrot Wj;Van der Auwera S;Milaneschi Y;Dolan Cv

  • Genetic Complexity of Cortical Structure: Differences in Genetic and Environmental Factors Influencing Cortical Surface Area and Thickness.

    Lachlan T Strike;Narelle K Hansell;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Paul M Thompson

  • Genetic effects influencing risk for major depressive disorder in China and Europe

    T B Bigdeli;S Ripke;R E Peterson;M Trzaskowski

  • Subcortical brain structure and suicidal behaviour in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis from the ENIGMA-MDD working group.

    M E Rentería;M E Rentería;L Schmaal;D P Hibar;B Couvy-Duchesne;B Couvy-Duchesne

  • Association Between Population Density and Genetic Risk for Schizophrenia.

    Lucía Colodro-Conde;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;John B Whitfield;Fabian Streit

  • Head Motion and Inattention/Hyperactivity Share Common Genetic Influences: Implications for fMRI Studies of ADHD

    Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Jane L. Ebejer;Nathan A. Gillespie;David L. Duffy

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology
Andrew M. McIntosh
Andrew M. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
Nathan A. Gillespie
Nathan A. Gillespie Virginia Commonwealth University
Lucía Colodro-Conde
Lucía Colodro-Conde QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Jian Yang
Jian Yang University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degrees and career paths, especially in mental health and social services. Many areas of study closely overlap; for instance, there are notable sociology and psychology similarities that can influence your academic focus and career choice. Understanding these connections can help students choose the right degree for their personal interests and long-term goals.

Counseling is a popular pathway for psychology graduates seeking to make a direct impact. Both online and campus-based programs are available, offering flexibility for busy students. Those looking for top options in specific areas might consider the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore or explore the top counseling degree programs in Boston.

California also boasts a strong selection of programs, which you can review in the best counseling program rankings in California. With an array of specialties and flexible online options, students can find pathways tailored to careers as counselors, social workers, researchers, or educators within the broad field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles