World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
10219
World Ranking
9028
National Ranking
530

Lucía Colodro-Conde publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucía Colodro-Conde sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lucía Colodro-Conde D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucía Colodro-Conde sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lucía Colodro-Conde is affiliated with the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily related to genetics, psychology, and medicine, focusing on the interplay between genetic and environmental factors in health and behavior.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Their work also covers important subfields such as:

  • Genetics
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Key research topics addressed by Lucía Colodro-Conde include:

  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

They have contributed to a number of research papers, some of the recent notable publications are:

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex, 2020, Science
  • Genome-wide gene-environment analyses of major depressive disorder and reported lifetime traumatic experiences in UK Biobank, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • The Genetic Architecture of Depression in Individuals of East Asian Ancestry, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment: an individual-based analysis of 28 twin cohorts, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • A phenome-wide association and Mendelian Randomisation study of polygenic risk for depression in UK Biobank, 2020, Nature Communications

Lucía Colodro-Conde frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Behavior Genetics
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Molecular Psychiatry

The scientist has worked extensively with various collaborators, including:

  • Sarah E. Medland
  • Nicholas G. Martin
  • Ian B. Hickie
  • Enda M. Byrne
  • Penelope A. Lind

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression

    Naomi R. Wray;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Manuel Mattheisen;MacIej Trzaskowski

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • A direct test of the diathesis-stress model for depression.

    L Colodro-conde;L Colodro-conde;B Couvy-duchesne;B Couvy-duchesne;Gu Zhu;W L Coventry

  • Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 neuroticism-associated loci

    Daniel J. Smith;Valentina Escott-Price;Gail Davies;Mark E. S. Bailey

  • A Comparison of Ten Polygenic Score Methods for Psychiatric Disorders Applied Across Multiple Cohorts

    Guiyan Ni;Jian Zeng;Joana A. Revez;Ying Wang

  • The Genetics of the Mood Disorder Spectrum: Genome-wide Association Analyses of More Than 185,000 Cases and 439,000 Controls

    Jonathan R I Coleman;Héléna A Gaspar;Julien Bryois

  • Differences in genetic and environmental variation in adult BMI by sex, age, time period, and region: an individual-based pooled analysis of 40 twin cohorts.

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Reijo Sund;Yoshie Yokoyama

  • Identifying the Common Genetic Basis of Antidepressant Response

    Oliver Pain;Karen Hodgson;Vassily Trubetskoy;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide study of depression identifies 697 associations implicating cell types and pharmacotherapies

    Unknown

  • Personality characteristics below facets: A replication and meta-analysis of cross-rater agreement, rank-order stability, heritability and utility of personality nuances

    René Mõttus;Jonah Sinick;Antonio Terracciano;Martina Hřebíčková

  • Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment: an individual-based analysis of 28 twin cohorts.

    Karri Silventoinen;Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Reijo Sund;Antti Latvala

  • Chronic low back pain and the risk of depression or anxiety symptoms: insights from a longitudinal twin study.

    Matt Fernandez;Lucia Colodro-Conde;Lucia Colodro-Conde;Jan Hartvigsen;Manuela L. Ferreira;Manuela L. Ferreira

  • Integrated analysis of environmental and genetic influences on cord blood DNA methylation in new-borns

    Darina Czamara;Gökçen Eraslan;Christian M Page;Christian M Page;Jari Lahti

  • Does Childhood Trauma Moderate Polygenic Risk for Depression? A Meta-analysis of 5765 Subjects From the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

    Peyrot Wj;Van der Auwera S;Milaneschi Y;Dolan Cv

  • Genetic association study of childhood aggression across raters, instruments, and age

    Hill F. Ip;Camiel M. van der Laan;Eva M.L. Krapohl;Isabell Brikell

  • Genetic correlations and genome-wide associations of cortical structure in general population samples of 22,824 adults

    Edith Hofer;Gennady V. Roshchupkin;Hieab H H Adams;Maria J. Knol

  • Association Between Population Density and Genetic Risk for Schizophrenia.

    Lucía Colodro-Conde;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne;John B Whitfield;Fabian Streit

  • Association of polygenic score for major depression with response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder

    Azmeraw T. Amare;Klaus Oliver Schubert;Klaus Oliver Schubert;Liping Hou;Scott R. Clark

  • The CODATwins Project: The Cohort Description of Collaborative Project of Development of Anthropometrical Measures in Twins to Study Macro-Environmental Variation in Genetic and Environmental Effects on Anthropometric Traits

    Karri Silventoinen;Aline Jelenkovic;Reijo Sund;Chika Honda

  • Relationship Between Level of Education and Breastfeeding Duration Depends on Social Context: Breastfeeding Trends Over a 40-Year Period in Spain

    Lucía Colodro-Conde;Juan F. Sánchez-Romera;María J. Tornero-Gómez;Francisco Pérez-Riquelme

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne
Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne University of Queensland
Karri Silventoinen
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Penelope A. Lind
Penelope A. Lind QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Nancy L. Pedersen
Nancy L. Pedersen Karolinska Institute
Meike Bartels
Meike Bartels Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a diverse range of online education and career opportunities in the United States. Many students pursue specialized fields such as substance abuse counseling, given the increasing need for qualified professionals in this area.

To become a counselor, requirements vary by location and state. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Bakersfield include specific educational backgrounds and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, Baltimore substance abuse counselors education requirements may require different certifications or degrees.

If you're interested in pursuing this career in other parts of the country, it's helpful to review resources such as Boise substance abuse counselors education requirements and Boston substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Each region and state may have distinctive pathways, but accredited online programs can help meet these varied prerequisites.

By understanding these differences in requirements across the country, students can better navigate their educational choices and unlock rewarding careers in the field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Lucía Colodro-Conde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles