World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
3037
World Ranking
7727
National Ranking
28

Michał Bogdziewicz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michał Bogdziewicz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 81 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michał Bogdziewicz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michał Bogdziewicz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michał Bogdziewicz is affiliated with Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań in Poland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing extensively to the understanding of ecological processes and plant-animal interactions.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, Bogdziewicz concentrates on several subfields such as:

  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Insect Science
  • Global and Planetary Change

The research also covers key topics including:

  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Michał Bogdziewicz has published in various scientific venues with frequent appearances in:

  • Ecology Letters
  • New Phytologist
  • Nature Communications
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Global Change Biology

The following are selected recent papers authored by Bogdziewicz or connected through relevant research domains:

  • Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech, 2020, Nature Plants
  • Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Seed size predicts global effects of small mammal seed predation on plant recruitment, 2020, Ecology Letters
  • Global patterns in the predator satiation effect of masting: A meta-analysis, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors associated with Bogdziewicz include:

  • Andrew Hacket-Pain
  • Jakub Szymkowiak
  • Valentin Journé
  • Magdalena Żywiec
  • Michael A. Steele

Best Publications

  • How do vertebrates respond to mast seeding

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Michał Bogdziewicz;Rafał Zwolak;Elizabeth E. Crone;Elizabeth E. Crone

  • Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech.

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Dave Kelly;Peter A Thomas;Jonathan G A Lageard

  • Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis

    Rafał Zwolak;Michał Bogdziewicz;Aleksandra Wróbel;Elizabeth E. Crone;Elizabeth E. Crone

  • Responses of small mammals to clear-cutting in temperate and boreal forests of Europe: a meta-analysis and review

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Rafał Zwolak

  • Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects.

    James S. Clark;James S. Clark;Robert Andrus;Melaine Aubry-Kientz;Yves Bergeron

  • Correlated seed failure as an environmental veto to synchronize reproduction of masting plants.

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Michael A. Steele;Shealyn Marino;Elizabeth E. Crone

  • Masting in wind-pollinated trees: system-specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Jakub Szymkowiak;Idalia Kasprzyk;Łukasz Grewling

  • Seed size predicts global effects of small mammal seed predation on plant recruitment

    Łukasz Dylewski;Łukasz Dylewski;Yvette K. Ortega;Michał Bogdziewicz;Dean E. Pearson;Dean E. Pearson

  • Investigating the relationship between climate, stand age, and temporal trends in masting behavior of European forest trees.

    Mario B. Pesendorfer;Mario B. Pesendorfer;Mario B. Pesendorfer;Michał Bogdziewicz;Jakub Szymkowiak;Zbigniew Borowski

  • Effects of nitrogen deposition on reproduction in a masting tree: benefits of higher seed production are trumped by negative biotic interactions

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Elizabeth E. Crone;Michael A. Steele;Rafał Zwolak

  • From theory to experiments for testing the proximate mechanisms of mast seeding: an agenda for an experimental ecology

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Davide Ascoli;Andrew Hacket‐Pain;Walter D. Koenig

  • Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence

    Tong Qiu;Marie-Claire Aravena;Robert Andrus;Davide Ascoli

  • Climate change and plant reproduction: trends and drivers of mast seeding change.

    Andrew Hacket-Pain;Michał Bogdziewicz;Michał Bogdziewicz

  • MASTREE+: Time‐series of plant reproductive effort from six continents

    Unknown

  • Nutrient scarcity as a selective pressure for mast seeding.

    M. Fernández-Martínez;Ian Pearse;Jordi Sardans;F. Sayol

  • The ecology and evolution of synchronized reproduction in long-lived plants

    Mario B. Pesendorfer;Mario B. Pesendorfer;Davide Ascoli;Michał Bogdziewicz;Michał Bogdziewicz;Andrew Hacket-Pain

  • Diet composition of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in different freshwater habitats of temperate Europe: a review and meta‐analysis

    Agata Joanna Krawczyk;Michał Bogdziewicz;Katarzyna Majkowska;Adam Glazaczow

  • Climate warming causes mast seeding to break down by reducing sensitivity to weather cues.

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Andrew Hacket‐Pain;Dave Kelly;Peter A. Thomas

  • The Moran effect and environmental vetoes: phenological synchrony and drought drive seed production in a Mediterranean oak

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Marcos Fernández-Martínez;Raul Bonal;Jordina Belmonte

  • Flowering synchrony drives reproductive success in a wind-pollinated tree.

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Mario Pesendorfer;Elizabeth E. Crone;Carlos Pérez‐Izquierdo

  • Effectiveness of predator satiation in masting oaks is negatively affected by conspecific density

    Michał Bogdziewicz;Josep Maria Espelta;Alberto Muñoz;José Miguel Aparicio

  • Beech masting modifies the response of rodents to forest management

    Rafał Zwolak;Michał Bogdziewicz;Leszek Rychlik

  • Data from: Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects

    B. Courbaud;William Schlesinger;R. Parmenter;Jennifer Swenson

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth E. Crone
Elizabeth E. Crone Tufts University
Josep Maria Espelta
Josep Maria Espelta Autonomous University of Barcelona
Raúl Bonal
Raúl Bonal University of Extremadura
Walter D. Koenig
Walter D. Koenig University of California, Berkeley
James S. Clark
James S. Clark Duke University
Josep Peñuelas
Josep Peñuelas Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
Krzysztof Zawierucha
Krzysztof Zawierucha Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Dean E. Pearson
Dean E. Pearson United States Department of Agriculture
Andrew J. Tanentzap
Andrew J. Tanentzap University of Cambridge
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers VA Palo Alto Health Care System

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution offers a gateway to diverse career options. Many students combine their studies with flexible online schools for human services programs, which can complement ecological work in conservation, community education, or non-profit organizations.

If you’re considering a shift into a specialized field, it’s worth asking: can a teacher become a speech pathologist? With the right degree, career pathways into science communication, education, and public outreach are accessible—even if your background is in teaching.

Thinking outside the box, some students pair their ecological interests with design skills through online architecture degree programs, focusing on green building, urban planning, or sustainable design. Similarly, strong analytical skills gained from a science background also translate well to related numerate fields.

For those who enjoy research and data analysis, a online math bachelor's degree can unlock roles in environmental modeling, data science, or ecological statistics. The adaptability of online education means you can tailor your studies to match evolving professional goals in the ecology and evolution landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Michał Bogdziewicz

Trending Scientists