World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6122 5756 3275 3037 887 60385

Jonathan Myers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Myers between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Myers published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 20.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2021. 29 of the 1,059 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2021. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 44 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 39 publications 2008: 53 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 44 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 45 publications 2019: 55 publications 2020: 53 publications 2021: 64 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 2 publications
1976 2026

1,059 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Myers: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 2
1986 2
1987 3
1988 1
1989 5
1990 8
1991 3
1992 4
1993 8
1994 5
1995 7
1996 44
1997 6
1998 13
1999 9
2000 9
2001 10
2002 16
2003 20
2004 16
2005 20
2006 27
2007 39
2008 53
2009 42
2010 44
2011 32
2012 35
2013 38
2014 53
2015 42
2016 29
2017 55
2018 45
2019 55
2020 53
2021 64
2022 31
2023 40
2024 38
2025 27
2026 2
Total 1,059
Download as CSV

Jonathan Myers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Myers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 887 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 887
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Myers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Myers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Myers is affiliated with the VA Palo Alto Health Care System in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in ophthalmology. The subfields covered in their body of work include ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, molecular biology, neurology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their main areas of study and research topics consist of:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal diseases and treatments
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal imaging and analysis
  • Ophthalmology and eye disorders
  • Intraocular surgery and lenses
  • Ophthalmology and visual impairment studies

Jonathan Myers has frequently published in several specialized journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
  • Journal of Glaucoma
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • JOURNAL OF CURRENT GLAUCOMA PRACTICE
  • Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Recent selected papers authored or co-authored by Myers are:

  • "Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Pathophysiology and management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension related to trauma," 2020, Survey of Ophthalmology
  • "Preliminary Report on a Novel Virtual Reality Perimeter Compared With Standard Automated Perimetry," 2020, Journal of Glaucoma
  • "Characterization of Central Visual Field Loss in End-stage Glaucoma by Unsupervised Artificial Intelligence," 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • "Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension," 2020, Journal of Glaucoma

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Myers include:

  • Reza Razeghinejad
  • Aakriti Garg Shukla
  • Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer
  • Daniel Lee
  • Wesam Shamseldin Shalaby

Best Publications

  • Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.

    Jonathan Myers;Manish Prakash;Victor Froelicher;Dat Do

  • Clinician’s Guide to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Adults A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Gary J. Balady;Ross Arena;Kathy Sietsema;Jonathan Myers

  • Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Robert Ross;Steven N. Blair;Ross Arena;Timothy S. Church

  • Exercise and Heart Failure A Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention

    Ileana L. Piña;Carl S. Apstein;Gary J. Balady;Romualdo Belardinelli

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Antonio Pelliccia;Sanjay Sharma;Sabiha Gati;Maria Bäck

  • Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Iacopo Olivotto;Artur Oreziak;Roberto Barriales-Villa;Theodore P. Abraham

  • Assessment of Functional Capacity in Clinical and Research Settings A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing

    Ross Arena;Jonathan Myers;Mark A. Williams;Martha Gulati

  • Fitness versus physical activity patterns in predicting mortality in men

    Jonathan Myers;Amir Kaykha;Sheela George;Joshua Abella

  • Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness as Major Markers of Cardiovascular Risk: Their Independent and Interwoven Importance to Health Status

    Jonathan Myers;Jonathan Myers;Paul McAuley;Carl J. Lavie;Jean Pierre Despres

  • Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management.

    Jonathan Myers;Matthew Lee;Jenny Kiratli

  • Comparison of the ramp versus standard exercise protocols.

    Jonathan Myers;Nancy Buchanan;Doug Walsh;Mark Kraemer

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Exercise and Cardiovascular Health

    Jonathan Myers

  • Exercise and Physical Activity Clinical Outcomes and Applications

    Peter Kokkinos;Jonathan Myers

  • Peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope in patients with heart failure: a prognostic comparison

    Ross Arena;Jonathan Myers;Syed Salman Aslam;Elsa B Varughese

  • Development of a Ventilatory Classification System in Patients With Heart Failure

    Ross A. Arena;Jonathan Myers;Joshua Abella;Mary Ann Peberdy

  • Reference Standards for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measured With Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Data From the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database.

    Leonard A. Kaminsky;Ross A. Arena;Jonathan Myers

  • Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on All-Cause and Disease-Specific Mortality: Advances Since 2009

    Matthew P. Harber;Leonard A. Kaminsky;Ross A. Arena;Steven N. Blair

  • Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing

    J. Myers;M. Prakash;V. Froelicher;D. Do

  • Psychosocial Interventions for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis

    Richard V. Milani;Jonathan Myers;Andrew L. Ries

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross Arena
Ross Arena University of Illinois at Chicago
Victor F. Froelicher
Victor F. Froelicher Stanford University
Marco Guazzi
Marco Guazzi University of Milan
Euan A. Ashley
Euan A. Ashley Stanford University
Richard V. Milani
Richard V. Milani University of Queensland
Carl J. Lavie
Carl J. Lavie University of Queensland
Daniel E. Forman
Daniel E. Forman University of Pittsburgh
Kyle E. Harms
Kyle E. Harms Louisiana State University
Ronald L. Dalman
Ronald L. Dalman Stanford University
James A. Lutz
James A. Lutz Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online healthcare and allied fields is an excellent way to expand your career options beyond traditional medical degrees. Prospective students often consider flexible and career-oriented programs to suit their lifestyle and current commitments.

For nurses, transitional programs like adn to fnp bridge programs offer a streamlined path to advanced practice roles. If you’re a nurse aiming to advance without extra clinicals, an rn to bsn online with no clinicals can be a convenient option.

Beyond nursing, fields like nutrition are growing rapidly. Earning an online nutrition degree can open doors to careers in health education, wellness coaching, or community health.

For those interested in healthcare administration, choosing whats the best online mha program for working adults can help working professionals move into leadership positions without interrupting their careers.

These online degrees offer flexible, accredited pathways into healthcare—whether you’re seeking clinical, administrative, or nutrition-focused roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles