World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
12304
World Ranking
3771
National Ranking
1320

Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 132 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira is affiliated with the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a substantial body of work spanning 102 publications in this field. Key subfields of study include Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Their scientific contributions address multiple topics, notably Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Forest Ecology and Management, Tree-ring Climate Responses, Plant and Animal Studies, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, and Forest Management and Policy.

Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world, 2020, Science
  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO 2, 2020, New Phytologist
  • Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth, 2020, Nature
  • Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth's ecosystems, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network, 2020, Biological Conservation

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as New Phytologist, Global Change Biology, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, and Ecology Letters. The number of publications at these venues reflects ongoing engagement with prominent journals in ecology and environmental science.

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include Sean M. McMahon, Valentine Herrmann, Norman A. Bourg, James A. Lutz, and William J. McShea, evidencing a network of research partnerships that enhance interdisciplinary approaches in their field.

Best Publications

  • Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world

    Nate G. McDowell;Craig D. Allen;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Brian H. Aukema

  • Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide

    Amy C. Bennett;Amy C. Bennett;Nathan G. McDowell;Craig D. Allen;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2

    Anthony P. Walker;Martin G. De Kauwe;Ana Bastos;Soumaya Belmecheri

  • Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth

    Susan C. Cook-Patton;Susan C. Cook-Patton;Sara M. Leavitt;David Gibbs;Nancy L. Harris

  • Drivers and Mechanisms of Tree Mortality in Moist Tropical Forests

    Nate G. McDowell;Craig D. Allen;Kristina Anderson‐Teixeira;Kristina Anderson‐Teixeira;Paulo M. Brando

  • Global importance of large‐diameter trees

    James A. Lutz;Tucker J. Furniss;Daniel J. Johnson;Stuart J. Davies

  • Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops.

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Sarah C. Davis;Michael D. Masters;Evan H. Delucia

  • Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Adam D. Miller;Jacqueline E. Mohan;Tara W. Hudiburg

  • Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels.

    Sarah C. Davis;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Evan H. DeLucia

  • Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems

    Allie Goldstein;Will R. Turner;Seth A. Spawn;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

  • Climate-regulation services of natural and agricultural ecoregions of the Americas

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Peter K. Snyder;Tracy E. Twine;Santiago V. Cuadra

  • Reduced nitrogen losses after conversion of row crop agriculture to perennial biofuel crops.

    Candice M. Smith;Mark B. David;Mark B. David;Corey A. Mitchell;Corey A. Mitchell;Michael D. Masters

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Differential responses of production and respiration to temperature and moisture drive the carbon balance across a climatic gradient in New Mexico

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;John P. Delong;John P. Delong;Andrew M. Fox;Daniel A. Brese

  • Vulnerability to forest loss through altered postfire recovery dynamics in a warming climate in the Klamath Mountains

    Alan J. Tepley;Jonathan R. Thompson;Howard E. Epstein;Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira

  • Altered belowground carbon cycling following land-use change to perennial bioenergy crops.

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Michael D. Masters;Christopher K. Black;Marcelo Zeri;Marcelo Zeri

  • Influences of fire–vegetation feedbacks and post-fire recovery rates on forest landscape vulnerability to altered fire regimes

    Alan J. Tepley;Enrique Thomann;Thomas T. Veblen;George L. W. Perry

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database

    Rafael Poyatos;Víctor Granda;Víctor Flo;Mark A. Adams;Mark A. Adams

  • Carbon exchange by establishing biofuel crops in Central Illinois

    Marcelo Zeri;Marcelo Zeri;Kristina Anderson-Teixeira;George Hickman;Michael Masters

  • Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC-db).

    Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira;Maria M H Wang;Jennifer C McGarvey;David S LeBauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sean M. McMahon
Sean M. McMahon Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Helene C. Muller-Landau
Helene C. Muller-Landau Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Matteo Detto
Matteo Detto Princeton University
William J. McShea
William J. McShea Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Carl J. Bernacchi
Carl J. Bernacchi University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lawren Sack
Lawren Sack University of California, Los Angeles
David Kenfack
David Kenfack Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Nate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution often leads students to consider flexible and affordable education options. Many accredited institutions now offer specialized programs online, making higher education more accessible to a broader range of learners.

For those interested in blending science with health care, online bsn to msn programs offer a pathway from nursing to advanced practice roles. These hybrid degrees can connect environmental science backgrounds with public health careers.

Students seeking reputable and flexible learning environments should consider nonprofit online colleges. These institutions are known for their academic quality while often being more affordable and mission-driven.

Active duty personnel and veterans may benefit from attending an online college for military, which offers tailored support and resources to help them succeed academically while balancing service commitments.

Additionally, students interested in community or environmental outreach can pursue an online masters in social work. This degree builds skills valued in ecological advocacy, policy, and social programs.

Best Scientists Citing Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles