World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9979
World Ranking
5664
National Ranking
3079

Stuart T. Hauser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart T. Hauser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stuart T. Hauser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart T. Hauser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart T. Hauser is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on health professions, with a particular emphasis on pharmacy and health information management.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Hauser has contributed to academic literature published in venues such as the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. One recent paper authored by Hauser is titled Interest and Experience in Culinary Medicine Training and Careers Among Current Nutrition Professionals, published in 2025.

Frequent collaborators in Hauser's research include:

  • Leslie A. McClure
  • Lauren Schmitt
  • C. McManus
  • Stephanie R. Harris

This list of coauthors reflects a network of collaborative work primarily within nutrition and health-related fields.

Best Publications

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescent-Family Interactions as Predictors of Adolescent Ego Development and Self-Esteem.

    Joseph P. Allen;Stuart T. Hauser;Kathy L. Bell;Thomas G. O'Connor

  • Attachment Theory as a Framework for Understanding Sequelae of Severe Adolescent Psychopathology: An 11-Year Follow-Up Study.

    Joseph P. Allen;Stuart T. Hauser;Emily Borman-Spurrell

  • Autonomy and Relatedness in Family Interactions as Predictors of Expressions of Negative Adolescent Affect

    Joseph P. Allen;Stuart T. Hauser;Charlene Eickholt;Kathy L. Bell

  • Stress, coping, and adaptation.

    Stuart T. Hauser;Mary Kay Bowlds

  • Self-Efficacy in Adolescent Girls and Boys With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

    Hildreth Youkilis Grossman;Stuart Brink;Stuart T Hauser

  • Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of young adults' states of mind regarding attachment

    Joseph P. Allen;Stuart T. Hauser

  • Loevinger's model and measure of ego development: A critical review.

    Stuart T. Hauser

  • Adherence Among Children and Adolescents With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Over a Four-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up: II. Immediate and Long-Term Linkages With the Family Milieu

    Stuart T. Hauser;Alan M. Jacobson;Philip Lavori;Joseph I. Wolfsdorf

  • Family environment and glycemic control: a four-year prospective study of children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

    A M Jacobson;S T Hauser;P Lavori;J B Willett

  • Reading others emotions: The role of intuitive judgments in predicting marital satisfaction, quality, and stability.

    Robert J. Waldinger;Marc S. Schulz;Stuart T. Hauser;Joseph P. Allen

  • Adherence among children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus over a four-year longitudinal follow-up: I. The influence of patient coping and adjustment.

    Alan M. Jacobson;Stuart T. Hauser;Philip Lavori;Joseph I. Wolfsdorf

  • Self-esteem and body satisfaction among late adolescents with acne : Results from a population survey

    Florence Dalgard;Florence Dalgard;Uwe Gieler;Jan Øivind Holm;Espen Bjertness

  • Being close and being social: peer ratings of distinct aspects of young adult social competence.

    Justine J. Larson;Sarah W. Whitton;Stuart T. Hauser;Joseph P. Allen

  • Understanding Resilient Outcomes: Adolescent Lives across Time and Generations.

    Stuart T. Hauser

  • Psychological Adjustment to IDDM: 10-Year Follow-Up of an Onset Cohort of Child and Adolescent Patients

    A M Jacobson;S T Hauser;J B Willett;J I Wolfsdorf

  • Prospective associations from family-of-origin interactions to adult marital interactions and relationship adjustment.

    Sarah W. Whitton;Robert J. Waldinger;Marc S. Schulz;Joseph P. Allen

  • Adolescent-parent relationships and leaving home in young adulthood.

    Thomas G. O'Connor;Joseph P. Allen;Kathy L. Bell;Stuart T. Hauser

  • Consequences of irregular versus continuous medical follow-up in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Alan M. Jacobson;Stuart T. Hauser;John Willett;Joseph I. Wolfsdorf

  • Out of the Woods: Tales of Resilient Teens

    Joseph P. Allen;Stuart T. Hauser;Eve Golden

  • Adolescent mental health.

    Unknown

  • Vulnerability and Resilience in Adolescence: Views from the Family

    Stuart T. Hauser;Marie Anne B. Vieyra;Alan M. Jacobson;Donald Wertlieb

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph P. Allen
Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia
Thomas G. O'Connor
Thomas G. O'Connor University of Rochester
John B. Willett
John B. Willett Harvard University
Philip W. Lavori
Philip W. Lavori Stanford University
Sarah W. Whitton
Sarah W. Whitton University of Cincinnati
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
Patricia K. Kerig
Patricia K. Kerig University of Utah
Robert S. Stern
Robert S. Stern Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a degree in psychology, it’s worthwhile to consider related fields like social work. Social work shares many foundational elements with psychology, such as understanding human behavior and promoting well-being. Many students opt for social work programs due to their practical approach and direct community impact.

For those interested in affordable education options, several cities in the United States offer budget-friendly social work degrees. Pennsylvania features some of the affordable social work degrees in Pennsylvania, while students in the Pacific Northwest can benefit from the cheapest social work programs in Seattle.

The southwest also provides opportunities, with the most affordable social work degree programs in San Antonio offering both online and campus-based options. Those on the West Coast might consider the cheapest social work programs in Portland.

Graduates in psychology or social work can pursue careers in counseling, case management, school support, and community outreach. Affordable online programs make these pathways more accessible, helping you launch a rewarding career while managing tuition costs.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart T. Hauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles