World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
85
Citations
41245
World Ranking
1162
National Ranking
720

Lester Luborsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lester Luborsky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 297 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lester Luborsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lester Luborsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research

Overview

Lester Luborsky was affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. They contributed to the academic community through their professional work, which was recognized by an award from the American Psychological Association.

In 1995, Luborsky received the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research. This award acknowledges significant applied research efforts in psychology.

No records of specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields of study are available for Lester Luborsky. Likewise, there is no detailed information on the precise main or subfields of study or specific topics of research work documented.

The available data indicates that Luborsky's career was primarily grounded in an applied research context within psychology, reflecting a professional focus that earned formal recognition.

Their academic legacy remains tied to the University of Pennsylvania as the primary institution of affiliation during their career.

Best Publications

  • An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index.

    A T McLellan;L Luborsky;G E Woody;C P O'Brien

  • New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

    A. McLELLAN;Lester Luborsky;John Cacciola;Jeffrey Griffith

  • Comparative Studies of Psychotherapies: Is It True That Everyone Has Won and All Must Have Prizes?

    Lester Luborsky;Barton Singer;Lise Luborsky

  • Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph

  • The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.

    Adam O. Horvath;Lester Luborsky

  • Predicting Response to Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatments: Role of Psychiatric Severity

    A T McLellan;L Luborsky;G E Woody;C P O'Brien

  • The relationship of depression and stressors to immunological assays: a meta-analytic review.

    Eric P. Zorrilla;Lester Luborsky;James R. McKay;Robert Rosenthal

  • Therapist Success and Its Determinants

    Lester Luborsky;A. Thomas McLellan;George E. Woody;Charles P. O'Brien

  • Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research.

    Lester Luborsky;Arthur H. Auerbach;Michael Chandler;Jacob Cohen

  • Principles Of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: A Manual For Supportive-expressive Treatment

    Lester Luborsky

  • Who will benefit from psychotherapy? : predicting therapeutic outcomes

    Lester Luborsky

  • Meta‐Analysis of Therapist Effects in Psychotherapy Outcome Studies

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Kathryn Baranackie;Julie S. Kurcias;Aaron T. Beck

  • Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

    Paul Crits-Christoph;Lynne Siqueland;Jack Blaine;Arlene Frank

  • The Researcher's Own Therapy Allegiances: A "Wild Card" in Comparisons of Treatment Efficacy

    Lester Luborsky;Louis Diguer;David A. Seligman;Robert Rosenthal

  • The Dodo Bird Verdict Is Alive and Well—Mostly

    Lester Luborsky;Robert Rosenthal;Louis Diguer;Tomasz P. Andrusyna

  • The Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II) : Psychometric Properties.

    Lester Luborsky;Jacques P. Barber;Lynne Siqueland;Suzanne Johnson

  • Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy. A counting signs vs. a global rating method.

    Lester Luborsky;Paul Crits-Christoph;Leslie Alexander;Miriam Margolis

  • Clinicians' Judgments of Mental Health: A Proposed Scale

    Lester Luborsky

  • Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: Role of treatment services.

    A. Thomas McLellan;Arthur I. Alterman;David S. Metzger;Grant R. Grissom

  • Psychotherapy for Opiate Addicts: Does It Help?

    Woody Ge;Luborsky L;McLellan At;O'Brien Cp

Frequent Co-Authors

George E. Woody
George E. Woody University of Pennsylvania
Paul Crits-Christoph
Paul Crits-Christoph University of Pennsylvania
Jacques P. Barber
Jacques P. Barber Adelphi University
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
Roger D. Weiss
Roger D. Weiss Harvard University
A. Thomas McLellan
A. Thomas McLellan University of Pennsylvania
Margaret L. Griffin
Margaret L. Griffin Harvard University
Lisa M. Najavits
Lisa M. Najavits University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania
Jack Blaine
Jack Blaine National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up multiple career paths beyond traditional counseling or research roles. For example, many graduates consider becoming a speech-language pathologist, a profession that merges communication sciences and health care. To begin this journey, each state has specific education, certification, and licensure requirements.

If you’re interested in becoming a speech therapist in Virginia, you’ll need a master’s degree in Speech-Language Pathology, pass a national exam, and complete required clinical hours. Similarly, the process of how to become a speech language pathologist in Washington involves postgraduate education, supervised clinical work, and state licensure.

It’s important to note that requirements differ significantly; for example, those interested in West Virginia slp certification requirements must meet both educational standards and pass specific exams. If you’re looking at becoming a speech therapist in Wisconsin, check for unique state guidelines regarding internships and licensing.

With the flexibility of online programs, pursuing these specialized pathways is now more accessible than ever for psychology students across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Lester Luborsky

Recently Published Articles