World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 147 88 75 49 40 673 72115
Medicine 135 2081 1938 1177 1080 599 61790

Rudolf H. Moos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rudolf H. Moos between 1959 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rudolf H. Moos published across 63 years, from 1959 to 2021, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2006. 4 of the 693 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2006. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 3 publications 1963: 2 publications 1964: 3 publications 1965: 7 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 7 publications 1968: 11 publications 1969: 10 publications 1970: 7 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 12 publications 1973: 8 publications 1974: 10 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 14 publications 1977: 18 publications 1978: 11 publications 1979: 12 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 12 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 18 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 18 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1959 2021

693 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rudolf H. Moos: publications per year, 1959 to 2021
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 3
1963 2
1964 3
1965 7
1966 2
1967 7
1968 11
1969 10
1970 7
1971 0
1972 12
1973 8
1974 10
1975 5
1976 14
1977 18
1978 11
1979 12
1980 11
1981 11
1982 12
1983 13
1984 18
1985 6
1986 13
1987 9
1988 8
1989 8
1990 12
1991 7
1992 9
1993 9
1994 17
1995 18
1996 22
1997 17
1998 16
1999 20
2000 15
2001 14
2002 19
2003 26
2004 13
2005 18
2006 27
2007 19
2008 17
2009 12
2010 23
2011 16
2012 15
2013 11
2014 8
2015 14
2016 3
2017 3
2018 13
2019 4
2020 1
2021 3
Total 693
Download as CSV

Rudolf H. Moos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf H. Moos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 671–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 673 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8 673
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rudolf H. Moos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf H. Moos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98 147
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Rudolf H. Moos is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects, Homelessness and Social Issues, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Rudolf H. Moos include:

  • Binge Drinking and Alcohol Problems Among Moderate Average-Level Drinkers, 2022, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Screen of drug use: Diagnostic accuracy for stimulant use disorder, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • Strong associations among PTSD, pain, and alcohol and drug use disorders in VA primary care patients, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • History of drinking problems diminishes the protective effects of within-guideline drinking on 18-year risk of dementia and CIND, 2021, BMC Public Health
  • Depressive Symptoms, Friend and Partner Relationship Quality, and Posttreatment Abstinence, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent coauthors include Charles J. Holahan, Quyên Q. Tiêt, Carole K. Holahan, Penny L. Brennan, and Kathleen K. Schutte.

Publication venues where Rudolf H. Moos frequently contributes include:

  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • BMC Public Health
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events

    Andrew G. Billings;Rudolf H. Moos

  • Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression

    Andrew G. Billings;Rudolf H. Moos

  • The development of a menstrual distress questionnaire.

    Rudolf H. Moos

  • Depressive Symptoms, Health Behaviors, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

    Mary A. Whooley;Peter de Jonge;Eric Vittinghoff;Christian Otte

  • Personal and contextual determinants of coping strategies.

    Charles J. Holahan;Rudolf H. Moos

  • Coping and adjustment in distressed and healthy adolescents

    Aaron T. Ebata;Rudolf H. Moos

  • Evaluating educational environments

    Rudolf H. Moos

  • Stress generation, avoidance coping, and depressive symptoms: a 10-year model.

    Charles J. Holahan;Rudolf H. Moos;Carole K. Holahan;Penny L. Brennan

  • Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Alcoholism Treatment: Context, Process, and Outcome

    Rudolf H. Moos;John W. Finney;Ruth C. Cronkite

  • Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms.

    Edison J. Trickett;Rudolph H. Moos

  • Conceptualizations of human environments.

    Rudolf H. Moos

  • Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Jeanne A. Schaefer

  • Family environment scale manual : Development,Applications,Research

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S Moos

  • Evaluating treatment environments : a social ecological approach

    Rudolf H. Moos

  • A typology of family social environments.

    Rudolf H. Moos;S P S Bernice Moos

  • Social support and psychological distress: a longitudinal analysis.

    Charles J. Holahan;Rudolf H. Moos

  • Social-environmental factors in unipolar depression: comparisons of depressed patients and nondepressed controls.

    Andrew G. Billings;Ruth C. Cronkite;Rudolf H. Moos

  • Dispositional and contextual perspectives on coping: toward an integrative framework.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Charles J. Holahan

  • Work environment scale manual

    Rudolf H. Moos

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Finney
John W. Finney VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Bernice S. Moos
Bernice S. Moos United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Penny L. Brennan
Penny L. Brennan University of California, San Francisco
Christine Timko
Christine Timko Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Ruth C. Cronkite
Ruth C. Cronkite Stanford University
Charles J. Holahan
Charles J. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys Stanford University
Paige Ouimette
Paige Ouimette Syracuse University
Carole K. Holahan
Carole K. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Alex H. S. Harris
Alex H. S. Harris Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online programs and career opportunities. Many students are drawn to flexible online degrees in psychology, counseling, or related fields, which can accelerate their entry into the workforce or allow them to advance their credentials while working.

The pathway to becoming a counselor varies by state and often includes a combination of education, supervised experience, and licensing exams. If you’re considering a counseling career, do your research to identify regional requirements. Some states offer streamlined or accelerated options, such as the quickest path to becoming a counselor in North Dakota and the fastest way to become a counselor in Ohio. Other regions have their own unique processes, including the fastest way to become a counselor in Oklahoma and specialized Oregon accelerated counseling programs.

With online study options expanding, it’s now possible to balance professional experience with advanced coursework in psychology or counseling—helping you reach your career goals more efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Rudolf H. Moos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles