World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7734
World Ranking
6983
National Ranking
3784

Bernice S. Moos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernice S. Moos sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bernice S. Moos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernice S. Moos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernice S. Moos is affiliated with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs in the United States. Their professional focus is situated within this governmental organization, where research and related activities likely intersect with veterans' health and related fields.

Although there are no specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or documented awards associated with Bernice S. Moos, the available information provides a foundational context for their academic and professional identity.

Without detailed data on fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, a comprehensive analysis of research specialization cannot be fully established. However, the current affiliation suggests involvement in areas relevant to veterans' services, healthcare policy, or public administration within a federal context.

Further details about specific contributions, publications, or recognized achievements are not present in the source data, which limits the scope of this profile to an overview of affiliation and professional standing.

Best Publications

  • Rates and predictors of relapse after natural and treated remission from alcohol use disorders

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Family environment scale manual : Development,Applications,Research

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S Moos

  • A typology of family social environments.

    Rudolf H. Moos;S P S Bernice Moos

  • Approach and avoidance coping responses among older problem and nonproblem drinkers.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Penny L. Brennan;Mark R. Fondacaro;Bernice S. Moos

  • Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: a 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Classroom Social Climate and Student Absences and Grades.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • The process of recovery from alcoholism: III. Comparing functioning in families of alcoholics and matched control families.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Long-term influence of duration and frequency of participation in alcoholics anonymous on individuals with alcohol use disorders.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Global assessment of functioning (GAF) ratings: determinants and role as predictors of one-year treatment outcomes.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Lucie McCoy;Bernice S. Moos

  • Protective resources and long-term recovery from alcohol use disorders.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Long-term influence of duration and intensity of treatment on previously untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Family characteristics and the outcome of treatment for alcoholism.

    R H Moos;E Bromet;V Tsu;B Moos

  • Ten-year patterns of alcohol consumption and drinking problems among older women and men.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Kathleen Schutte;Penny Brennan;Bernice S. Moos

  • Outpatient mental health care, self-help groups, and patients' one-year treatment outcomes.

    Rudolf Moos;Jeanne Schaefer;Jill Andrassy;Bernice Moos

  • Older adults' alcohol consumption and late-life drinking problems: a 20-year perspective.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Kathleen K. Schutte;Penny L. Brennan;Bernice S. Moos

  • Global Assessment of Functioning Ratings and the Allocation and Outcomes of Mental Health Services

    Rudolf H. Moos;Aran C. Nichol;Bernice S. Moos

  • Older adults' coping with negative life events: common processes of managing health, interpersonal, and financial/work stressors.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Penny L. Brennan;Kathleen K. Schutte;Bernice S. Moos

  • Long-term treatment careers and outcomes of previously untreated alcoholics.

    C. Timko;R. H. Moos;John W. Finney;B. S. Moos

  • Sixteen-year changes and stable remission among treated and untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos

  • Gender, treatment and self-help in remission from alcohol use disorders.

    Rudolf H. Moos;Bernice S. Moos;Christine Timko

  • High-Risk Alcohol Consumption and Late-Life Alcohol Use Problems

    Rudolf H. Moos;Penny L. Brennan;Kathleen K. Schutte;Bernice S. Moos

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudolf H. Moos
Rudolf H. Moos Stanford University
Penny L. Brennan
Penny L. Brennan University of California, San Francisco
Christine Timko
Christine Timko Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
John W. Finney
John W. Finney VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Daniel M. Blonigen
Daniel M. Blonigen VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Lorrin M. Koran
Lorrin M. Koran Stanford University
Carole K. Holahan
Carole K. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Charles J. Holahan
Charles J. Holahan The University of Texas at Austin
Ruth C. Cronkite
Ruth C. Cronkite Stanford University
Andrew Baum
Andrew Baum University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a variety of rewarding career paths in social work, counseling, and mental health services. An online psychology degree can serve as a versatile foundation for many of these professions. However, becoming a licensed social worker requires specialized training and credentials that vary by state.

For example, the Georgia education requirements for social workers specify a minimum of a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) for entry-level roles, while advanced practice often requires a Master’s degree. Similarly, social worker education requirements in Hawaii outline both degree and fieldwork expectations before becoming licensed.

If you’re considering Idaho, the social worker degree requirements in Idaho distinguish between different levels of licensure based on degree attainment. Meanwhile, the Illinois minimum degree requirement for social workers highlights the importance of accredited programs and specific coursework.

Exploring online degrees related to psychology and social work gives students the flexibility to meet these diverse requirements while preparing for key roles supporting individuals, families, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Bernice S. Moos