World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7275 6784 3934 3576 110 7475

Lee Ann Kaskutas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lee Ann Kaskutas between 1991 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lee Ann Kaskutas published across 33 years, from 1991 to 2023, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1998. 5 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1998. 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications
1991 2023

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lee Ann Kaskutas: publications per year, 1991 to 2023
Year Publications
1991 4
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 4
1997 2
1998 9
1999 4
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 8
2005 5
2006 0
2007 4
2008 8
2009 8
2010 3
2011 2
2012 4
2013 3
2014 5
2015 6
2016 1
2017 1
2018 5
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 2
2023 3
Total 116
Download as CSV

Lee Ann Kaskutas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Ann Kaskutas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lee Ann Kaskutas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee Ann Kaskutas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lee Ann Kaskutas is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Medicine and Health Professions, with a notable concentration in subfields such as Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics addressed in Kaskutas's work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Kaskutas has contributed to several publications, with recent papers covering various aspects of substance use recovery and treatment:

  • Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC), 2023, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Testing a Socioecological Model of Relapse and Recovery from Alcohol Problems, 2020, Substance Abuse Research and Treatment
  • Predictors and outcomes of online mutual-help group attendance in a national survey study, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Understanding the Shared Meaning of Recovery From Substance Use Disorders: New Findings From the What is Recovery? Study, 2023, Substance Abuse Research and Treatment
  • Understanding the Shared Meaning of Recovery from Substance Use Disorders: New Findings from the What is Recovery? Study, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

Kaskutas frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Substance Abuse Research and Treatment
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Kaskutas's research profile, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Sarah E. Zemore
  • Elizabeth A. Bowen
  • Andrew Irish
  • Gregory E. Wilding
  • Charles LaBarre

Best Publications

  • Alcoholics Anonymous Effectiveness: Faith Meets Science

    Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Jason Bond;Keith Humphreys

  • Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: Toward evidence-based practice and policy

    Keith Humphreys;Stephen Wing;Dennis McCarty;John Chappel

  • How important is treatment? One‐year outcomes of treated and untreated alcohol‐dependent individuals

    Constance Weisner;Constance Weisner;Helen Matzger;Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • The persistent influence of social networks and alcoholics anonymous on abstinence.

    Jason Bond;Lee Ann Kaskutas;Constance Weisner

  • Changes in drinking patterns among whites, blacks and Hispanics, 1984-1992

    R. Caetano;Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • Elements that define recovery: the experiential perspective.

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Thomasina J Borkman;Alexandre Laudet;Lois A Ritter

  • The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: Development, Reliability, and Norms for Diverse Treated and Untreated Populations

    Keith Humphreys;Lee Ann Kaskutas;Constance Weisner

  • Effectiveness of Making Alcoholics Anonymous Easier: A group format 12-step facilitation approach

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Meenakshi S. Subbaraman;Jane Witbrodt;Sarah E. Zemore

  • Predictors of help seeking among a longitudinal sample of the general population, 1984-1992.

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Constance Weisner;Raul Caetano

  • In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper.

    Sarah E. Zemore;Lee Ann Kaskutas;Lyndsay N. Ammon

  • Helping, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in recovery.

    Sarah E Zemore;Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • Alcoholics anonymous careers : Patterns of AA involvement five years after treatment entry

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Lyndsay Ammon;Kevin Delucchi;Robin Room

  • What do women get out of self-help? Their reasons for attending Women for Sobriety and Alcoholics Anonymous.

    Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • Twelve-Step affiliation and 3-year substance use outcomes among adolescents: social support and religious service attendance as potential mediators

    Felicia W. Chi;Lee A. Kaskutas;Stacy A. Sterling;Cynthia I. Campbell

  • Long‐term effects of alcohol warning labels: Findings from a comparison of the United States and Ontario, Canada

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Karen L. Graves;Lee A. Kaskutas

  • An alternative to standard drinks as a measure of alcohol consumption.

    Lee Ann Kaskutas;Karen Graves

  • Reasons for drinking less and their relationship to sustained remission from problem drinking.

    Helen Matzger;Lee Ann Kaskutas;Constance Weisner;Constance Weisner

  • USING PROPENSITY SCORES TO ADJUST FOR SELECTION BIAS WHEN ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES

    Yu Ye;Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • Does Diagnosis Matter? Differential Effects of 12-Step Participation and Social Networks on Abstinence

    Jane Witbrodt;Lee Ann Kaskutas

  • A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD.

    Sarah E. Zemore;Camillia K. Lui;Amy A. Mericle;Jordana Hemberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Constance Weisner
Constance Weisner Kaiser Permanente
Thomas K. Greenfield
Thomas K. Greenfield Alcohol Research Group
Jason Bond
Jason Bond Alcohol Research Group
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys Stanford University
Alexandre B. Laudet
Alexandre B. Laudet National Development and Research Institutes
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Raul Caetano
Raul Caetano Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Barbara S. McCrady
Barbara S. McCrady University of New Mexico
Rudolf H. Moos
Rudolf H. Moos Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a range of career opportunities, especially in mental health counseling. Online programs offer flexible pathways for those aiming to become professional counselors. However, it's important to remember that each state—and even city—can have distinct licensing and educational requirements.

Those interested in working in Kentucky can find more details on what it takes to become a mental health counselor in Lexington, including state-specific education and supervised experience guidelines. In Nebraska, students should check the unique Lincoln mental health counselor education requirements to ensure their degree aligns with local standards.

Similarly, California offers diverse opportunities, but requirements may differ by city. If planning to work in Long Beach, it’s helpful to see what’s needed to become a mental health counselor in Long Beach. For those targeting larger metropolitan areas, such as Los Angeles, carefully review the detailed mental health counselor requirements in Los Angeles before enrolling in an online program.

By researching location-specific pathways and accredited online options, students can successfully prepare for a rewarding career in psychology and mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Lee Ann Kaskutas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles