World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas K. Greenfield

Thomas K. Greenfield

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
73
Citations
21171
World Ranking
632
National Ranking
303

Thomas K. Greenfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas K. Greenfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas K. Greenfield is affiliated with the Alcohol Research Group in the United States. Their published work primarily focuses on medicine, with a special emphasis on epidemiology, general health professions, pathology and forensic medicine, physiology, and pharmacology. The majority of their research integrates topics related to substance abuse treatment and outcomes, alcohol consumption and health effects, homelessness and social issues, smoking behavior and cessation, cannabis and cannabinoid research, behavioral health and interventions, and health disparities and outcomes.

Greenfield has contributed extensively to the scientific literature with over a hundred publications centered in medicine. Within their field of study, epidemiology is the most prolific subfield, followed by general health professions and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their recent papers include:

  • Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Testing Alcohol Labels as a Tool to Communicate Cancer Risk to Drinkers: A Real-World Quasi-Experimental Study, 2020, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • The role of alcohol use in the aetiology and progression of liver disease: A narrative review and a quantification, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Longitudinal assessment of drinking changes during the pandemic: The 2021 COVID-19 follow-up study to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey, 2022, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Mental health and drinking to cope in the early COVID period: Data from the 2019-2020 US National Alcohol Survey, 2022, Addictive Behaviors

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Katherine J. Karriker-Jaffe (27 collaborations)
  • William C. Kerr (24 collaborations)
  • Deidre Patterson (14 collaborations)
  • Yu Ye (11 collaborations)
  • Nina Mulia (11 collaborations)

Thomas K. Greenfield has published regularly in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (10 publications)
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (6 publications)
  • Addictive Behaviors (6 publications)
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (5 publications)
  • Addiction (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

    Martin G. Sanda;Rodney L. Dunn;Jeff Michalski;Howard M. Sandler

  • Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: cross‐cultural patterns

    R W Wilsnack;N D Vogeltanz;S C Wilsnack;T R Harris

  • Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI.

    Jane M. Zich;C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • The more you drink, the harder you fall: A systematic review and meta-analysis of how acute alcohol consumption and injury or collision risk increase together

    Bruce Taylor;H. M. Irving;Fotis Kanteres;Robin Room;Robin Room

  • Disparities in Alcohol-related Problems among White, Black and Hispanic Americans

    Nina Mulia;Yinjiao Ye;Thomas K. Greenfield;Sarah E. Zemore

  • Average Volume of Alcohol Consumption, Patterns of Drinking, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from the US National Alcohol Survey

    Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K. Greenfield;John D. Rogers

  • Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;William C. Kerr

  • The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8.

    C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Alcohol-Attributable Cancer Deaths and Years of Potential Life Lost in the United States

    David E. Nelson;Dwayne W. Jarman;Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: experience with graduated frequencies

    Tom K. Greenfield

  • Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Lorraine T. Midanik;John D. Rogers

  • Social disadvantage, stress, and alcohol use among black, Hispanic, and white Americans: findings from the 2005 U.S. National Alcohol Survey.

    Nina Mulia;Yinjiao Ye;Sarah E. Zemore;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Predictors of Violence in Civilly Committed Acute Psychiatric Patients

    Dale E. McNiel;Renée L. Binder;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and Service Satisfaction Scale-30.

    C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Are Lifetime Abstainers the Best Control Group in Alcohol Epidemiology? On the Stability and Validity of Reported Lifetime Abstention

    Jürgen T. Rehm;Hyacinth Irving;Yinjiao Ye;William C. Kerr

  • Risk functions for alcohol-related problems in a 1988 US national sample

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Tammy W. Tam;Thomas K. Greenfield;Raul Caetano

  • Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: results from the National Alcohol Survey.

    Laura A. Schmidt;Yu Ye;Thomas K. Greenfield;Jason Bond

  • Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications.

    T K Greenfield;J D Rogers

  • Assessment methods for alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis.

    Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K Greenfield;Gordon Walsh;Xiaodi Xie

  • A 10-year national trend study of alcohol consumption, 1984-1995: is the period of declining drinking over?

    T K Greenfield;L T Midanik;J D Rogers

  • Unequal treatment: racial and ethnic disparities in alcoholism treatment services.

    Laura Schmidt;Thomas Greenfield;Nina Mulia

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason Bond
Jason Bond Alcohol Research Group
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Lorraine T. Midanik
Lorraine T. Midanik University of California, Berkeley
Sharon C. Wilsnack
Sharon C. Wilsnack University of North Dakota
Norman Giesbrecht
Norman Giesbrecht Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lee Ann Kaskutas
Lee Ann Kaskutas University of California, Berkeley
Tim Stockwell
Tim Stockwell University of Victoria
Christopher J. Ruhm
Christopher J. Ruhm University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online degrees. Many students are exploring online bachelor's degree programs as a pathway to start their academic journey or switch careers affordably and efficiently.

For those seeking advancement, online master programs offer specialized study options, many of which can be completed in as little as one year. Cost is a common concern; you can discover how much does a masters in psychology cost to plan your budget more effectively.

If your goal is leadership in education or administration, you might also consider 1 year edd programs online. These accelerated doctorates allow for rapid career progression without sacrificing quality.

Overall, online Social Sciences and Humanities degrees provide flexible, accessible, and affordable routes into meaningful careers in teaching, research, policy, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas K. Greenfield

Trending Scientists