World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas K. Greenfield

Thomas K. Greenfield

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 73 632 552 303 261 290 21171

Thomas K. Greenfield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas K. Greenfield between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas K. Greenfield published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2020. 26 of the 323 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2020. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications
1977 2025

323 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas K. Greenfield: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 3
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 6
1997 3
1998 5
1999 11
2000 10
2001 2
2002 3
2003 6
2004 11
2005 1
2006 12
2007 11
2008 14
2009 14
2010 11
2011 11
2012 10
2013 12
2014 14
2015 10
2016 5
2017 10
2018 16
2019 12
2020 21
2021 17
2022 7
2023 6
2024 12
2025 14
Total 323
Download as CSV

Thomas K. Greenfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 290
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas K. Greenfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas K. Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46 73
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas K. Greenfield is affiliated with the Alcohol Research Group in the United States. Their published work primarily focuses on medicine, with a special emphasis on epidemiology, general health professions, pathology and forensic medicine, physiology, and pharmacology. The majority of their research integrates topics related to substance abuse treatment and outcomes, alcohol consumption and health effects, homelessness and social issues, smoking behavior and cessation, cannabis and cannabinoid research, behavioral health and interventions, and health disparities and outcomes.

Greenfield has contributed extensively to the scientific literature with over a hundred publications centered in medicine. Within their field of study, epidemiology is the most prolific subfield, followed by general health professions and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their recent papers include:

  • Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Testing Alcohol Labels as a Tool to Communicate Cancer Risk to Drinkers: A Real-World Quasi-Experimental Study, 2020, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • The role of alcohol use in the aetiology and progression of liver disease: A narrative review and a quantification, 2021, Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Longitudinal assessment of drinking changes during the pandemic: The 2021 COVID-19 follow-up study to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey, 2022, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Mental health and drinking to cope in the early COVID period: Data from the 2019-2020 US National Alcohol Survey, 2022, Addictive Behaviors

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Katherine J. Karriker-Jaffe (27 collaborations)
  • William C. Kerr (24 collaborations)
  • Deidre Patterson (14 collaborations)
  • Yu Ye (11 collaborations)
  • Nina Mulia (11 collaborations)

Thomas K. Greenfield has published regularly in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (10 publications)
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (6 publications)
  • Addictive Behaviors (6 publications)
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (5 publications)
  • Addiction (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

    Martin G. Sanda;Rodney L. Dunn;Jeff Michalski;Howard M. Sandler

  • Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: cross‐cultural patterns

    R W Wilsnack;N D Vogeltanz;S C Wilsnack;T R Harris

  • Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI.

    Jane M. Zich;C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • The more you drink, the harder you fall: A systematic review and meta-analysis of how acute alcohol consumption and injury or collision risk increase together

    Bruce Taylor;H. M. Irving;Fotis Kanteres;Robin Room;Robin Room

  • Disparities in Alcohol-related Problems among White, Black and Hispanic Americans

    Nina Mulia;Yinjiao Ye;Thomas K. Greenfield;Sarah E. Zemore

  • Average Volume of Alcohol Consumption, Patterns of Drinking, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from the US National Alcohol Survey

    Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K. Greenfield;John D. Rogers

  • Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;William C. Kerr

  • The UCSF Client Satisfaction Scales: I. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8.

    C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Alcohol-Attributable Cancer Deaths and Years of Potential Life Lost in the United States

    David E. Nelson;Dwayne W. Jarman;Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: experience with graduated frequencies

    Tom K. Greenfield

  • Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.

    Thomas K. Greenfield;Lorraine T. Midanik;John D. Rogers

  • Social disadvantage, stress, and alcohol use among black, Hispanic, and white Americans: findings from the 2005 U.S. National Alcohol Survey.

    Nina Mulia;Yinjiao Ye;Sarah E. Zemore;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Predictors of Violence in Civilly Committed Acute Psychiatric Patients

    Dale E. McNiel;Renée L. Binder;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and Service Satisfaction Scale-30.

    C. Clifford Attkisson;Thomas K. Greenfield

  • Are Lifetime Abstainers the Best Control Group in Alcohol Epidemiology? On the Stability and Validity of Reported Lifetime Abstention

    Jürgen T. Rehm;Hyacinth Irving;Yinjiao Ye;William C. Kerr

  • Risk functions for alcohol-related problems in a 1988 US national sample

    Lorraine T. Midanik;Tammy W. Tam;Thomas K. Greenfield;Raul Caetano

  • Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: results from the National Alcohol Survey.

    Laura A. Schmidt;Yu Ye;Thomas K. Greenfield;Jason Bond

  • Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications.

    T K Greenfield;J D Rogers

  • Assessment methods for alcohol consumption, prevalence of high risk drinking and harm: a sensitivity analysis.

    Jürgen Rehm;Thomas K Greenfield;Gordon Walsh;Xiaodi Xie

  • A 10-year national trend study of alcohol consumption, 1984-1995: is the period of declining drinking over?

    T K Greenfield;L T Midanik;J D Rogers

  • Unequal treatment: racial and ethnic disparities in alcoholism treatment services.

    Laura Schmidt;Thomas Greenfield;Nina Mulia

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason Bond
Jason Bond Alcohol Research Group
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Lorraine T. Midanik
Lorraine T. Midanik University of California, Berkeley
Sharon C. Wilsnack
Sharon C. Wilsnack University of North Dakota
Norman Giesbrecht
Norman Giesbrecht Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lee Ann Kaskutas
Lee Ann Kaskutas University of California, Berkeley
Tim Stockwell
Tim Stockwell University of Victoria
Christopher J. Ruhm
Christopher J. Ruhm University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online degrees. Many students are exploring online bachelor's degree programs as a pathway to start their academic journey or switch careers affordably and efficiently.

For those seeking advancement, online master programs offer specialized study options, many of which can be completed in as little as one year. Cost is a common concern; you can discover how much does a masters in psychology cost to plan your budget more effectively.

If your goal is leadership in education or administration, you might also consider 1 year edd programs online. These accelerated doctorates allow for rapid career progression without sacrificing quality.

Overall, online Social Sciences and Humanities degrees provide flexible, accessible, and affordable routes into meaningful careers in teaching, research, policy, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas K. Greenfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles