World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6138 5699 2937 2676 109 8700

James Frank publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Frank between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Frank published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2017. 10 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2017. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1985 2025

119 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Frank: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 4
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 3
2008 0
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 1
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 4
2017 8
2018 2
2019 5
2020 6
2021 7
2022 5
2023 3
2024 5
2025 5
Total 119
Download as CSV

James Frank publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Frank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 109 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 109
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

James Frank D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Frank sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

James Frank is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research spans various topics within social sciences, business, management, and accounting, with a focus on policing practices and organizational behavior.

Frank's body of work encompasses numerous subfields, including sociology and political science, political science and international relations, organizational behavior and human resource management, general health professions, and social psychology.

The main topics investigated in their research include:

  • Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

James Frank has published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Asian Journal of Criminology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • American Journal of Criminal Justice
  • International Criminology
  • Police Practice and Research

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by James Frank are:

  • Problems spilling over: work-family conflict's and other stressor variables' relationships with job involvement and satisfaction among police officers, 2021, Journal of Policing Intelligence and Counter Terrorism
  • Supporting the Message, Not the Messenger: The Correlates of Attitudes towards Black Lives Matter, 2020, American Journal of Criminal Justice
  • The good life: Exploring the effects job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on the life satisfaction of police officers, 2021, International Journal of Police Science & Management
  • Organizational Trust and Job Stress: a Preliminary Study Among Police Officers, 2021, Asian Journal of Criminology
  • Testing the Job Demands-Job Resources Model for Police Officer Job Burnout in a Sample of Indian Police Officers, 2022, International Criminology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Hanif Qureshi
  • Eric G. Lambert
  • Omeed S. Ilchi
  • Mia A. Holbrook
  • Charles F. Klahm

Best Publications

  • The Social Rejection of Former Mental Patients: Understanding Why Labels Matter'

    Bruce G. Link;Francis T. Cullen;James Frank;John F. Wozniak

  • The social dimensions of correctional officer stress

    Francis T. Cullen;Bruce G. Link;Nancy T. Wolfe;James Frank

  • RACE, COMMUNITY CONTEXT AND CONFIDENCE IN THE POLICE

    Liqun Cao;James Frank;Francis T. Cullen

  • Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship

    Steven G. Brandl;James Frank;Robert E. Worden;Timothy S. Bynum

  • How kids view cops The nature of juvenile attitudes toward the police

    Yolander G. Hurst;James Frank

  • Exploring the Basis of Citizens’ Attitudes Toward the Police:

    James Frank;Brad W. Smith;Kenneth J. Novak

  • Race and Officer Decision Making: Examining Differences in Arrest Outcomes between Black and White Officers

    Robert A. Brown;James Frank

  • Reassessing the impact of race on citizens' attitudes toward the police: A research note

    James Frank;Steven G. Brandl;Francis T. Cullen;Amy Stichman

  • The attitudes of juveniles toward the police

    Yolander G. Hurst;James Frank;Sandra Lee Browning

  • Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor

    Mengyan Dai;James Frank;Ivan Sun

  • Who are the complaint-prone officers?: An examination of the relationship between police officers' attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens' complaints about excessive force

    Steven G Brandl;Meghan S Stroshine;James Frank

  • Is the Impact of Cumulative Disadvantage on Sentencing Greater for Black Defendants

    John Wooldredge;James Frank;Natalie Goulette;Lawrence Travis

  • Revisiting the Decision to Arrest: Comparing Beat and Community Officers

    Kenneth J. Novak;James Frank;Brad W. Smith;Robin Shepard Engel

  • Job Stress, Job Involvement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment and Their Associations with Job Burnout Among Indian Police Officers: a Research Note

    Eric G. Lambert;Hanif Qureshi;James Frank;Charles Klahm

  • "Stop Or I'll Shoot": Racial Differences in Support for Police Use of Deadly Force

    Francist T. Cullen;Liqun Cao;James Frank;Robert H. Langworthy

  • The relationship of work-family conflict with job stress among Indian police officers: a research note

    Eric G. Lambert;Hanif Qureshi;James Frank;Linda D. Keena

  • Identifying variation in police officer behavior between juveniles and adults

    Robert A. Brown;Kenneth J. Novak;James Frank

  • Examining Police Officer Work Stress Using the Job Demands–Resources Model:

    James Frank;Eric G. Lambert;Hanif Qureshi

  • Do Good Recruits Make Good Cops? Problems Predicting and Measuring Academy and Street-Level Success

    Billy Henson;Bradford W. Reyns;Charles F. Klahm;James Frank

  • The content of community policing: a comparison of the daily activities of community and “beat” officers

    James Frank;Steven G. Brandl;R. Cory Watkins

  • Police‐citizen encounters and field citations: Do encounter characteristics influence ticketing?

    Robert A. Brown;James Frank

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric G. Lambert
Eric G. Lambert University of Nevada Reno
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati
John Wooldredge
John Wooldredge University of Cincinnati
Robin S. Engel
Robin S. Engel University of Cincinnati
Nancy L. Hogan
Nancy L. Hogan Ferris State University
Lorraine Mazerolle
Lorraine Mazerolle University of Queensland
John E. Eck
John E. Eck University of Cincinnati
Bruce G. Link
Bruce G. Link University of California, Riverside
John B. Cullen
John B. Cullen Washington State University
Christopher T. Lowenkamp
Christopher T. Lowenkamp University of Missouri–Kansas City

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can open the door to a variety of fulfilling careers focused on helping others and understanding society. Thanks to technological advancements, earning a degree online is now more accessible and flexible than ever before.

Many students are drawn to counseling roles, and accredited options are important for future licensure. Consider pursuing cacrep-accredited online counseling programs for reputable and affordable pathways to becoming a professional counselor.

For those interested in family dynamics and mental wellness, online marriage and family therapy programs offer specialized training to support relationships and community wellbeing.

Psychology remains a popular choice for those interested in human behavior. If cost is a major factor, you may want to explore the cheapest online psychology degree programs for a high-quality but budget-friendly education.

Social work is another vital field for positive change. Programs like the msw online options allow you to make a difference while offering flexible admission criteria.

Best Scientists Citing James Frank

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles