World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
23517
World Ranking
8559
National Ranking
3658

William E. Hart publications per year

1964: 1 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 1 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications
1964 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

William E. Hart publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Hart sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 175 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William E. Hart D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Hart sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Hart is affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a focus on computing, psychology, and epidemiology as reflected in their publication record and topics of study.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Exascale applications: skin in the game, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Effect of specific non-pharmaceutical intervention policies on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the counties of the United States, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Linear model decision trees as surrogates in optimization of engineering applications, 2023, Computers & Chemical Engineering
  • A survey of software implementations used by application codes in the Exascale Computing Project, 2021, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • Effect of specific non-pharmaceutical intervention policies on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the counties of the United States, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors of William E. Hart include:

  • Carl D. Laird
  • Bethany L. Nicholson
  • John D. Siirola
  • Jean-Paul Watson
  • Michael Bynum

The scientist has contributed multiple publications to a range of venues, often publishing repeatedly in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computing in Science & Engineering
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Their research interests cover several subfields, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Main topics addressed in their work consist of:

  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry

William E. Hart is also an author of the book Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python 3rd Ed., published in 2022 by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Best Publications

  • Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function

    Garrett M. Morris;David S. Goodsell;Robert S. Halliday;Ruth Huey

  • Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python

    William E. Hart;Carl Laird;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python

    William E. Hart;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • The battle of the water sensor networks (BWSN): A design challenge for engineers and algorithms

    Avi Ostfeld;James G. Uber;Elad Salomons;Jonathan W. Berry

  • Adaptive global optimization with local search

    William Eugene Hart

  • Sensor Placement in Municipal Water Networks

    Jonathan W. Berry;Jonathan W. Berry;Lisa Fleischer;Lisa Fleischer;William E. Hart;William E. Hart;Cynthia A. Phillips;Cynthia A. Phillips

  • Measurement and classification of retinal vascular tortuosity.

    William E. Hart;Michael H. Goldbaum;Brad Côté;Paul Kube

  • Sensor Placement in Municipal Water Networks with Temporal Integer Programming Models

    Jonathan Berry;William E. Hart;Cynthia A. Phillips;James G. Uber

  • Recent advances in memetic algorithms

    William E. Hart;N. Krasnogor;J. E. Smith

  • DAKOTA, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis Version 3.0 Reference Manual

    Michael S. Eldred;Anthony A. Giunta;Bart G. Van Bloemen Waanders;Steven F. Wojtkiewicz Jr.

  • Review of Sensor Placement Strategies for Contamination Warning Systems in Drinking Water Distribution Systems

    William E. Hart;William E. Hart;Regan Murray;Regan Murray

  • Fast protein folding in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic model within three-eighths of optimal

    William E. Hart;Sorin C. Istrail

  • Robust proofs of NP-hardness for protein folding: general lattices and energy potentials.

    William E. Hart;Sorin Istrail

  • Opportunities for Combinatorial Optimization in Computational Biology

    Harvey J. Greenberg;William E. Hart;Giuseppe Lancia

  • Protein structure prediction with evolutionary algorithms

    Natalio Krasnogor;William E. Hart;Jim Smith;David A. Pelta

  • PySP: modeling and solving stochastic programs in Python

    Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff;William E. Hart

  • Memetic Evolutionary Algorithms

    W. E. Hart;N. Krasnogor;J. E. Smith

  • A Multiple-Objective Analysis of Sensor Placement Optimization in Water Networks

    Jean-Paul Watson;Harvey J. Greenberg;William E. Hart

  • Pico: An Object-Oriented Framework for Parallel Branch and Bound *

    Jonathan Eckstein;Cynthia A. Phillips;William E. Hart

  • Optimising an Arbitrary Function is Hard for the Genetic Algorithm.

    William E. Hart;Richard K. Belew

  • Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints

    William E. Hart;Carl D. Laird;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Paul Watson
Jean-Paul Watson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Cynthia A. Phillips
Cynthia A. Phillips Sandia National Laboratories
David L. Woodruff
David L. Woodruff University of California, Davis
Sorin Istrail
Sorin Istrail Brown University
Harvey J. Greenberg
Harvey J. Greenberg University of Colorado Denver
Jonathan Eckstein
Jonathan Eckstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Natalio Krasnogor
Natalio Krasnogor Newcastle University
Richard K. Belew
Richard K. Belew University of California, San Diego
Derek A. T. Cummings
Derek A. T. Cummings University of Florida
Timothy C. Germann
Timothy C. Germann Los Alamos National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the tech industry continues to grow, many students are now seeking flexible options to advance their computer science education. For those interested in building foundational skills or making a career change, earning an associate degree online can be a practical starting point. This pathway allows individuals to enter the workforce quickly or smoothly transition into a bachelor’s program.

If affordability is a key concern, you can find high-quality programs among the cheap online colleges listed on Research.com. These institutions offer reputable computer science degrees without heavy tuition fees, making education more accessible.

Don’t let your academic history hold you back. There are excellent online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, so even those with a less-than-perfect record can pursue a computer science career.

For professionals seeking advancement, explore the masters degrees that are worth it in computer science. These highly demanded programs can open doors to leadership and specialized roles, making your investment in education pay off.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Hart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles