World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
8139
World Ranking
2443
National Ranking
1025

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
9969
World Ranking
7172
National Ranking
1952

David L. Woodruff publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Woodruff sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 130 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David L. Woodruff D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Woodruff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Woodruff is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Engineering, with a focus on Management Science and Operations Research, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, Control and Systems Engineering, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

Their contributions span several interconnected topics including:

  • Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Economic theories and models
  • Electric Power System Optimization
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Woodruff include:

  • Cell2Fire: A Cell-Based Forest Fire Growth Model to Support Strategic Landscape Management Planning (2021), published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • CONWIP Redux: reflections on 30 years of development and implementation (2021), published in International Journal of Production Research
  • Catastrophe insurance and flexible planning for supply chain disruption management: a stochastic simulation case study (2023), published in International Journal of Production Research
  • Assessment of wind power scenario creation methods for stochastic power systems operations (2020), published in Applied Energy
  • A parallel hub-and-spoke system for large-scale scenario-based optimization under uncertainty (2023), published in Mathematical Programming Computation

Woodruff has frequently collaborated with a number of other researchers, including:

  • Jean-Paul Watson
  • John D. Siirola
  • Carl D. Laird
  • Bethany L. Nicholson
  • William E. Hart

Publication venues where Woodruff has multiple contributions include:

  • International Journal of Production Research
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Mathematical Programming Computation
  • Applied Energy

In addition to research articles, Woodruff has authored books in the field of optimization modeling:

  • Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python (2021), published by Springer International Publishing
  • Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python 3rd Ed. (2022), published by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Best Publications

  • CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban

    Mark L. Spearman;David L. Woodruff;Wallace J. Hopp

  • Pyomo - Optimization Modeling in Python

    William E. Hart;Carl Laird;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python

    William E. Hart;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • Identification of Outliers in Multivariate Data

    David M. Rocke;David L. Woodruff

  • Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems

    Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • A class of stochastic programs withdecision dependent random elements

    Tore W. Jonsbråten;Roger J.-B. Wets;David L. Woodruff

  • Progressive hedging and tabu search applied to mixed integer (0,1) multistage stochastic programming

    Arne Løkketangen;David L. Woodruff

  • Introduction to Computational Optimization Models for Production Planning in a Supply Chain

    Stefan Voß;David L. Woodruff

  • Obtaining lower bounds from the progressive hedging algorithm for stochastic mixed-integer programs

    Dinakar Gade;Gabriel Hackebeil;Sarah M. Ryan;Jean-Paul Watson

  • Hashing vectors for tabu search

    David L. Woodruff;Eitan Zemel

  • Computable Robust Estimation of Multivariate Location and Shape in High Dimension Using Compound Estimators

    David L. Woodruff;David M. Rocke

  • PySP: modeling and solving stochastic programs in Python

    Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff;William E. Hart

  • The stochastic vehicle routing problem, a literature review, part I: models

    Jorge Oyola;Halvard Arntzen;David L. Woodruff

  • Modeling and solving a large-scale generation expansion planning problem under uncertainty

    Shan Jin;Sarah M. Ryan;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

  • Solving the medium newspaper production/distribution problem

    Michael G. Van Buer;David L. Woodruff;Rick T. Olson

  • Production planning with load dependent lead times

    Julia Pahl;Stefan Voß;David L. Woodruff

  • Production planning with load dependent lead times: an update of research

    Julia Pahl;Stefan Voß;David L. Woodruff

  • Toward scalable, parallel progressive hedging for stochastic unit commitment

    Sarah M. Ryan;Roger J.-B Wets;David L. Woodruff;Cesar Silva-Monroy

  • Discrimination models using variance-stabilizing transformation of metabolomic NMR data.

    Parul V. Purohit;David M. Rocke;Mark R. Viant;David L. Woodruff

  • Optimization software class libraries

    Stefan Voß;David L. Woodruff

  • Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints

    William E. Hart;Carl D. Laird;Jean-Paul Watson;David L. Woodruff

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Paul Watson
Jean-Paul Watson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
William E. Hart
William E. Hart Sandia National Laboratories
Stefan Voß
Stefan Voß Universität Hamburg
Roger J.-B. Wets
Roger J.-B. Wets University of California, Davis
Teodor Gabriel Crainic
Teodor Gabriel Crainic University of Quebec at Montreal
David L. Martell
David L. Martell University of Toronto
Guido Perboli
Guido Perboli Polytechnic University of Turin
Andrés Weintraub
Andrés Weintraub University of Chile
Carlito B. Lebrilla
Carlito B. Lebrilla University of California, Davis
James D. McCalley
James D. McCalley Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. Many students explore advanced business roles by pursuing an cheapest aacsb online dba, which combines analytical skills with leadership training. This option is ideal for those aiming to blend quantitative expertise with strategic decision-making.

For individuals interested in finance, the best online masters in finance programs provide insights into risk management, investment strategies, and financial modeling—key areas where strong mathematical foundations are crucial.

Entrepreneurs and business professionals often turn to the fastest online mba programs to gain essential management skills quickly. These programs offer flexibility and accelerated paths, helping math graduates apply their analytical skills in business contexts fast.

Additionally, pursuing a master's degree in marketing can be a smart choice for those interested in data-driven marketing strategies, leveraging statistical analysis and consumer behavior insights to drive business growth.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Woodruff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles