World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jose M. Framinan

Jose M. Framinan

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
49
Citations
7463
World Ranking
1164
National Ranking
16

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
53
Citations
8643
World Ranking
3481
National Ranking
73

Jose M. Framinan publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose M. Framinan sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 131 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jose M. Framinan D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose M. Framinan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jose M. Framinan is affiliated with the University of Seville in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Business, Management and Accounting, with a strong focus on subfields such as Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Control and Systems Engineering, and Business and International Management.

The main topics addressed by Framinan include:

  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

Jose M. Framinan has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems, 2023, European Journal of Operational Research
  • Solving the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with limited human resource constraint, 2020, Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains: The interplay of information transparencies, return rates, and lead times, 2020, International Journal of Production Economics
  • Remanufacturing configuration in complex supply chains, 2020, Omega
  • Design of a testbed for hybrid flow shop scheduling with identical machines, 2020, Computers & Industrial Engineering

Their frequent coauthors include Salvatore Cannella, Victor Fernández-Viagas, Roberto Domínguez, António Costa, and Rebecca Fussone. These collaborations suggest a consistent engagement with scholars working in related fields of industrial engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain management.

Framinan's publications have appeared mainly in the following venues:

  • Computers & Industrial Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • International Journal of Production Research
  • International Journal of Production Economics

Best Publications

  • Review: Review and classification of hybrid flow shop scheduling problems from a production system and a solutions procedure perspective

    Imma Ribas;Rainer Leisten;Jose M. Framiñan

  • A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective

    Jose M. Framiñan;Jatinder N. D. Gupta;Rainer Leisten

  • An efficient constructive heuristic for flowtime minimisation in permutation flow shops

    J.M. Framinan;R. Leisten

  • The CONWIP production control system: Review and research issues

    Jose M. Framinan;Pedro L. González;Rafael Ruiz-Usano

  • A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation

    Victor Fernandez-Viagas;Rubén Ruiz;Jose M. Framinan

  • A bounded-search iterated greedy algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem

    Victor Fernandez-Viagas;Jose M. Framinan

  • Different initial sequences for the heuristic of Nawaz, Enscore and Ham to minimize makespan, idletime or flowtime in the static permutation flowshop sequencing problem

    J. M. Framinan;R. Leisten;C. Rajendran

  • Approximative procedures for no-wait job shop scheduling

    Christoph J Schuster;Jose M Framinan

  • New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan

    Eva Vallada;Rubén Ruiz;Jose M. Framinan

  • Manufacturing Scheduling Systems

    Jose M. Framinan;Rainer Leisten;Rubén Ruiz García

  • A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems

    Paz Perez-Gonzalez;Jose M. Framinan

  • Comparison of heuristics for flowtime minimisation in permutation flowshops

    Jose M. Framinan;Rainer Leisten;Rafael Ruiz-Usano

  • The distributed permutation flow shop to minimise the total flowtime

    Victor Fernandez-Viagas;Paz Perez-Gonzalez;Jose M. Framinan

  • On insertion tie-breaking rules in heuristics for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem

    Victor Fernandez-Viagas;Jose M. Framinan

  • Closed-loop supply chains: What reverse logistics factors influence performance?

    Salvatore Cannella;Manfredi Bruccoleri;Jose M. Framinan

  • Efficient heuristics for flowshop sequencing with the objectives of makespan and flowtime minimisation

    Jose M Framinan;Rainer Leisten;Rafael Ruiz-Usano

  • Effective constructive heuristics and meta-heuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem

    Quan-Ke Pan;Quan-Ke Pan;Liang Gao;Li Xin-Yu;Framinan M. Jose

  • Deterministic assembly scheduling problems: A review and classification of concurrent-type scheduling models and solution procedures

    Jose M. Framinan;Paz Perez-Gonzalez;Victor Fernandez-Viagas

  • On the Bullwhip Avoidance Phase: The Synchronised Supply Chain

    Elena Ciancimino;Salvatore Cannella;Manfredi Bruccoleri;Jose M. Framinan

  • Architecture of manufacturing scheduling systems: Literature review and an integrated proposal

    Jose M. Framinan;Rubén Ruiz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana Paula Barbosa-Póvoa
Ana Paula Barbosa-Póvoa Instituto Superior Técnico
Rubén Ruiz
Rubén Ruiz Universitat Politècnica de València
Stephen Michael Disney
Stephen Michael Disney University of Exeter
Angel A. Juan
Angel A. Juan Universitat Politècnica de València
Matthias Holweg
Matthias Holweg University of Oxford
Chandrasekharan Rajendran
Chandrasekharan Rajendran Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Jatinder N. D. Gupta
Jatinder N. D. Gupta University of Alabama in Huntsville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, pursuing a related advanced degree can open diverse career opportunities. Many students opt for affordable graduate programs that align with their goals. For example, exploring a cheap masters in finance offers a pathway into analytical roles within banking, investment, and corporate finance sectors.

Alternatively, professionals aiming to enhance leadership and management skills often seek flexible programs. The quickest online mba degrees provide accelerated routes to advanced business knowledge, suitable for working individuals.

Marketing is another promising field, combining quantitative analysis with creativity. Prospective students might find value in pursuing a masters degree in marketing, balancing affordability with strong salary potential in digital marketing, brand management, and market research.

For those interested in a concise and intensive curriculum, several institutions offer a one year mba program, designed to fast-track leadership development and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Jose M. Framinan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles