World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
7403
World Ranking
5341
National Ranking
1953

James E. Dye publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Dye sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James E. Dye D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Dye sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Optics
  • Atmosphere of Earth

His primary scientific interests are in Environmental science, Meteorology, Troposphere, Atmospheric sciences and Forward scatter. His work in the fields of Meteorology, such as Thunderstorm, Cirrus and Precipitation, overlaps with other areas such as Cloud base and Cloud top. His work focuses on many connections between Troposphere and other disciplines, such as Lightning, that overlap with his field of interest in Altitude.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Flow, Sulfuric acid and Nitric acid in addition to Atmospheric sciences. As part of the same scientific family, James E. Dye usually focuses on Forward scatter, concentrating on Spectrometer and intersecting with Remote sensing and Dead time. His Remote sensing course of study focuses on Instrumentation and Stratosphere.

His most cited work include:

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns (253 citations)
  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion (235 citations)
  • Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation (230 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James E. Dye mainly focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Meteorology, Environmental science, Stratosphere and Aerosol. His research integrates issues of Climatology, Particle-size distribution, Ozone and Analytical chemistry in his study of Atmospheric sciences. His study in the field of Thunderstorm, Lightning, Storm and Convection is also linked to topics like Cloud physics.

His Stratosphere study combines topics in areas such as Atmospheric chemistry, Spectrometer, Mixing ratio and Particle size. His Spectrometer research focuses on Remote sensing and how it relates to Calibration. His research in Aerosol intersects with topics in Environmental chemistry, Mineralogy and Ozone depletion.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (46.59%)
  • Meteorology (38.64%)
  • Environmental science (38.64%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2000-2019)?

  • Meteorology (38.64%)
  • Lightning (18.18%)
  • Environmental science (38.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

James E. Dye mainly focuses on Meteorology, Lightning, Environmental science, Thunderstorm and Convection. His work on Field mill and Mesoscale meteorology as part of general Meteorology research is frequently linked to Cloud physics and Electrification, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. James E. Dye has included themes like Aeronautics and Flash in his Lightning study.

James E. Dye integrates many fields, such as Environmental science and engineering, in his works. His Atmospheric sciences study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Ozone. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Stratosphere and Aerosol.

Between 2000 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns (253 citations)
  • Microphysical Observations of Tropical Clouds (110 citations)
  • Observational‐ and modeling‐based budget of lightning‐produced NOx in a continental thunderstorm (71 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Optics
  • Atmosphere of Earth

James E. Dye mainly investigates Meteorology, Environmental science, Convection, Climatology and Cloud physics. His work in the fields of Meteorology, such as Lightning and Thunderstorm, intersects with other areas such as Cloud top. His study in Thunderstorm is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Storm, Convective storm detection and Aerosol.

Environmental science and Atmospheric sciences are two areas of study in which he engages in interdisciplinary research. In the subject of general Convection, his work in Freezing level is often linked to Liquid water and Materials science, thereby combining diverse domains of study. When carried out as part of a general Climatology research project, his work on Ozone layer and Troposphere is frequently linked to work in Nitrogen oxide, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

Best Publications

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer;Paul R. Field;Stephen L. Durden

  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion

    D. W. Fahey;S. R. Kawa;E. L. Woodbridge;P. Tin

  • Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation

    James E. Dye;D. Baumgardner;B. W. Gandrud;S. R. Kawa

  • Early electrification and precipitation development in a small, isolated Montana cumulonimbus

    J. E. Dye;J. J. Jones;W. P. Winn;T. A. Cerni

  • Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part I: Electronic and Optical Studies

    James E. Dye;Darrel Baumgardner

  • Evaluation of the forward scattering spectrometer probe. Part II: Corrections for coincidence and dead-time losses

    Darrel Baumgardner;Walter Strapp;James E. Dye

  • A model evaluation of noninductive graupel‐ice charging in the early electrification of a mountain thunderstorm

    Conrad L. Ziegler;Donald R. MacGorman;James E. Dye;Peter S. Ray

  • Interpretation of measurements made by the forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP‐300) during the Airborne Arctic Stratospheric Expedition

    Darrel Baumgardner;James E. Dye;Bruce W. Gandrud;Robert G. Knollenberg

  • The potential of cirrus clouds for heterogeneous chlorine activation

    Stephan Borrmann;Susan Solomon;Susan Solomon;James E. Dye;Beiping Luo

  • Chemical loss of ozone in the Arctic polar vortex in the winter of 1991- 1992

    R. J. Salawitch;S. C. Wofsy;E. W. Gottlieb;L. R. Lait

  • Microphysical Observations of Tropical Clouds

    Jeffrey L. Stith;James E. Dye;Aaron Bansemer;Andrew J. Heymsfield

  • Distributions of NO, NOx, NOy, and O3 to 12 km altitude during the summer monsoon season over New Mexico

    B. A. Ridley;J. G. Walega;J. E. Dye;F. E. Grahek

  • Observations of Moist Adiabatic Ascent in Northeast Colorado Cumulus Congestus Clouds

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Peter N. Johnson;James E. Dye

  • The Brewer‐Dobson Circulation In the Light of High Altitude In Situ Aircraft Observations

    A. F. Tuck;D. Baumgardner;K. R. Chan;J. E. Dye

  • A cloud‐scale model study of lightning‐generated NO x in an individual thunderstorm during STERAO‐A

    Alex J. DeCaria;Kenneth E. Pickering;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;John R. Scala

  • Anomalously low negative cloud-to-ground lightning flash rates in intense convective storms observed during STERAO-A

    Timothy J. Lang;Steven A. Rutledge;James E. Dye;Martin Venticinque

  • Analysis of the physical state of one Arctic polar stratospheric cloud based on observations

    K. Drdla;A. Tabazadeh;R. P. Turco;M. Z. Jacobson

  • On the production of active nitrogen by thunderstorms over New Mexico

    B. A. Ridley;J. E. Dye;J. G. Walega;J. Zheng

  • Observations within two regions of charge during initial thunderstorm electrification

    J. E. Dye;J. J. Jones;J. J. Jones;A. J. Weinheimer;W. P. Winn;W. P. Winn

  • Performance of a focused cavity aerosol spectrometer for measurements in the stratosphere of particle size in the 0.06-2.0-micrometer-diameter range

    H.H. Jonsson;J.C. Wilson;C.A. Brock;R.G. Knollenberg

  • An overview of the Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment with results for the July 10, 1996 storm

    J. E. Dye;B. A. Ridley;W. Skamarock;M. Barth

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Wilson
James C. Wilson University of Denver
Darrel Baumgardner
Darrel Baumgardner National Autonomous University of Mexico
Max Loewenstein
Max Loewenstein Ames Research Center
Haflidi H. Jonsson
Haflidi H. Jonsson Naval Postgraduate School
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
K. K. Kelly
K. K. Kelly National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Brian A. Ridley
Brian A. Ridley National Center for Atmospheric Research
K. R. Chan
K. R. Chan Ames Research Center
Stephan Borrmann
Stephan Borrmann Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Ross J. Salawitch
Ross J. Salawitch University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your skill set through related degrees can open diverse career pathways. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) plays a crucial role in environmental analysis and resource management. Exploring the best gis programs in the us can enhance your ability to collect and interpret spatial data effectively.

Public administration is another complementary field, especially if you aim to influence environmental policies or manage sustainability programs. Many professionals turn to some of the easiest online mpa programs to quickly gain leadership and administrative skills without interrupting their careers.

Understanding societal dynamics is also essential in environmental advocacy and community engagement. Pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online offers valuable perspectives on social behavior, which can inform effective environmental campaigns.

For educators or professionals looking to lead in environmental education and policy, advanced degrees matter. Online options like online edd programs no dissertation provide flexible pathways to higher credentials without the added stress of dissertation requirements.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Dye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles