World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5343 5119 1953 1806 98 7403

James E. Dye publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Dye between 1972 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Dye published across 48 years, from 1972 to 2019, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1997. 2 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1997. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
1972 2019

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Dye: publications per year, 1972 to 2019
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 3
1975 0
1976 3
1977 0
1978 2
1979 5
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 5
1990 5
1991 3
1992 5
1993 6
1994 5
1995 3
1996 6
1997 7
1998 2
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
Total 98
Download as CSV

James E. Dye publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Dye sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 98
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

James E. Dye D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Dye sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Optics
  • Atmosphere of Earth

His primary scientific interests are in Environmental science, Meteorology, Troposphere, Atmospheric sciences and Forward scatter. His work in the fields of Meteorology, such as Thunderstorm, Cirrus and Precipitation, overlaps with other areas such as Cloud base and Cloud top. His work focuses on many connections between Troposphere and other disciplines, such as Lightning, that overlap with his field of interest in Altitude.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Flow, Sulfuric acid and Nitric acid in addition to Atmospheric sciences. As part of the same scientific family, James E. Dye usually focuses on Forward scatter, concentrating on Spectrometer and intersecting with Remote sensing and Dead time. His Remote sensing course of study focuses on Instrumentation and Stratosphere.

His most cited work include:

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns (253 citations)
  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion (235 citations)
  • Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation (230 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James E. Dye mainly focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Meteorology, Environmental science, Stratosphere and Aerosol. His research integrates issues of Climatology, Particle-size distribution, Ozone and Analytical chemistry in his study of Atmospheric sciences. His study in the field of Thunderstorm, Lightning, Storm and Convection is also linked to topics like Cloud physics.

His Stratosphere study combines topics in areas such as Atmospheric chemistry, Spectrometer, Mixing ratio and Particle size. His Spectrometer research focuses on Remote sensing and how it relates to Calibration. His research in Aerosol intersects with topics in Environmental chemistry, Mineralogy and Ozone depletion.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (46.59%)
  • Meteorology (38.64%)
  • Environmental science (38.64%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2000-2019)?

  • Meteorology (38.64%)
  • Lightning (18.18%)
  • Environmental science (38.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

James E. Dye mainly focuses on Meteorology, Lightning, Environmental science, Thunderstorm and Convection. His work on Field mill and Mesoscale meteorology as part of general Meteorology research is frequently linked to Cloud physics and Electrification, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. James E. Dye has included themes like Aeronautics and Flash in his Lightning study.

James E. Dye integrates many fields, such as Environmental science and engineering, in his works. His Atmospheric sciences study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Ozone. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Stratosphere and Aerosol.

Between 2000 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns (253 citations)
  • Microphysical Observations of Tropical Clouds (110 citations)
  • Observational‐ and modeling‐based budget of lightning‐produced NOx in a continental thunderstorm (71 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Optics
  • Atmosphere of Earth

James E. Dye mainly investigates Meteorology, Environmental science, Convection, Climatology and Cloud physics. His work in the fields of Meteorology, such as Lightning and Thunderstorm, intersects with other areas such as Cloud top. His study in Thunderstorm is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Storm, Convective storm detection and Aerosol.

Environmental science and Atmospheric sciences are two areas of study in which he engages in interdisciplinary research. In the subject of general Convection, his work in Freezing level is often linked to Liquid water and Materials science, thereby combining diverse domains of study. When carried out as part of a general Climatology research project, his work on Ozone layer and Troposphere is frequently linked to work in Nitrogen oxide, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

Best Publications

  • Observations and Parameterizations of Particle Size Distributions in Deep Tropical Cirrus and Stratiform Precipitating Clouds: Results from In Situ Observations in TRMM Field Campaigns

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Aaron Bansemer;Paul R. Field;Stephen L. Durden

  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion

    D. W. Fahey;S. R. Kawa;E. L. Woodbridge;P. Tin

  • Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation

    James E. Dye;D. Baumgardner;B. W. Gandrud;S. R. Kawa

  • Early electrification and precipitation development in a small, isolated Montana cumulonimbus

    J. E. Dye;J. J. Jones;W. P. Winn;T. A. Cerni

  • Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part I: Electronic and Optical Studies

    James E. Dye;Darrel Baumgardner

  • Evaluation of the forward scattering spectrometer probe. Part II: Corrections for coincidence and dead-time losses

    Darrel Baumgardner;Walter Strapp;James E. Dye

  • A model evaluation of noninductive graupel‐ice charging in the early electrification of a mountain thunderstorm

    Conrad L. Ziegler;Donald R. MacGorman;James E. Dye;Peter S. Ray

  • Interpretation of measurements made by the forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP‐300) during the Airborne Arctic Stratospheric Expedition

    Darrel Baumgardner;James E. Dye;Bruce W. Gandrud;Robert G. Knollenberg

  • The potential of cirrus clouds for heterogeneous chlorine activation

    Stephan Borrmann;Susan Solomon;Susan Solomon;James E. Dye;Beiping Luo

  • Chemical loss of ozone in the Arctic polar vortex in the winter of 1991- 1992

    R. J. Salawitch;S. C. Wofsy;E. W. Gottlieb;L. R. Lait

  • Microphysical Observations of Tropical Clouds

    Jeffrey L. Stith;James E. Dye;Aaron Bansemer;Andrew J. Heymsfield

  • Distributions of NO, NOx, NOy, and O3 to 12 km altitude during the summer monsoon season over New Mexico

    B. A. Ridley;J. G. Walega;J. E. Dye;F. E. Grahek

  • Observations of Moist Adiabatic Ascent in Northeast Colorado Cumulus Congestus Clouds

    Andrew J. Heymsfield;Peter N. Johnson;James E. Dye

  • The Brewer‐Dobson Circulation In the Light of High Altitude In Situ Aircraft Observations

    A. F. Tuck;D. Baumgardner;K. R. Chan;J. E. Dye

  • A cloud‐scale model study of lightning‐generated NO x in an individual thunderstorm during STERAO‐A

    Alex J. DeCaria;Kenneth E. Pickering;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;John R. Scala

  • Anomalously low negative cloud-to-ground lightning flash rates in intense convective storms observed during STERAO-A

    Timothy J. Lang;Steven A. Rutledge;James E. Dye;Martin Venticinque

  • Analysis of the physical state of one Arctic polar stratospheric cloud based on observations

    K. Drdla;A. Tabazadeh;R. P. Turco;M. Z. Jacobson

  • On the production of active nitrogen by thunderstorms over New Mexico

    B. A. Ridley;J. E. Dye;J. G. Walega;J. Zheng

  • Observations within two regions of charge during initial thunderstorm electrification

    J. E. Dye;J. J. Jones;J. J. Jones;A. J. Weinheimer;W. P. Winn;W. P. Winn

  • Performance of a focused cavity aerosol spectrometer for measurements in the stratosphere of particle size in the 0.06-2.0-micrometer-diameter range

    H.H. Jonsson;J.C. Wilson;C.A. Brock;R.G. Knollenberg

  • An overview of the Stratospheric-Tropospheric Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols, and Ozone (STERAO)-Deep Convection experiment with results for the July 10, 1996 storm

    J. E. Dye;B. A. Ridley;W. Skamarock;M. Barth

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Wilson
James C. Wilson University of Denver
Darrel Baumgardner
Darrel Baumgardner National Autonomous University of Mexico
Max Loewenstein
Max Loewenstein Ames Research Center
Haflidi H. Jonsson
Haflidi H. Jonsson Naval Postgraduate School
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
K. K. Kelly
K. K. Kelly National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Brian A. Ridley
Brian A. Ridley National Center for Atmospheric Research
K. R. Chan
K. R. Chan Ames Research Center
Stephan Borrmann
Stephan Borrmann Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Ross J. Salawitch
Ross J. Salawitch University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your skill set through related degrees can open diverse career pathways. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) plays a crucial role in environmental analysis and resource management. Exploring the best gis programs in the us can enhance your ability to collect and interpret spatial data effectively.

Public administration is another complementary field, especially if you aim to influence environmental policies or manage sustainability programs. Many professionals turn to some of the easiest online mpa programs to quickly gain leadership and administrative skills without interrupting their careers.

Understanding societal dynamics is also essential in environmental advocacy and community engagement. Pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online offers valuable perspectives on social behavior, which can inform effective environmental campaigns.

For educators or professionals looking to lead in environmental education and policy, advanced degrees matter. Online options like online edd programs no dissertation provide flexible pathways to higher credentials without the added stress of dissertation requirements.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Dye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles