World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
78
Citations
20508
World Ranking
1084
National Ranking
472

Ross J. Salawitch publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ross J. Salawitch sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 349 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Ross J. Salawitch D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ross J. Salawitch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Ross J. Salawitch is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant emphasis on atmospheric science and related subfields.

The scientist's work covers multiple areas within their main fields of study. Key research topics include atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, climate variability and models, vehicle emissions and performance, as well as ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics.

Salawitch has published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include Atmospheric Environment, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Nature Communications.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response, 2020, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion, 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections, 2021, Earth's Future
  • Climate change favours large seasonal loss of Arctic ozone, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Measurement report: Aircraft observations of ozone, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds over Hebei Province, China, 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include T. Canty, Russell R. Dickerson, Laura A. McBride, Xinrong Ren, and A. Hope.

Ross J. Salawitch was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Reductions of Antarctic ozone due to synergistic interactions of chlorine and bromine

    Michael B. McElroy;Ross J. Salawitch;Steven C. Wofsy;Jennifer A. Logan

  • The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission

    D Crisp;RM Atlas;FM Breon;LR Brown

  • Precision Requirements for Space-based XCO2 Data

    C. E. Miller;D. Crisp;P. L. DeCola;S. C. Olsen

  • Removal of Stratospheric O3 by Radicals: In Situ Measurements of OH, HO2, NO, NO2, ClO, and BrO

    P. O. Wennberg;R. C. Cohen;R. M. Stimpfle;J. P. Koplow

  • Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability

    David G. Streets;Timothy Canty;Gregory R. Carmichael;Benjamin de Foy

  • Hydrogen Radicals, Nitrogen Radicals, and the Production of O3 in the Upper Troposphere

    P. O. Wennberg;T. F. Hanisco;L. Jaeglé;D. J. Jacob

  • Arctic ozone loss and climate change

    M. Rex;R. J. Salawitch;P. von der Gathen;N. R. P. Harris

  • Observed relationships of ozone air pollution with temperature and emissions

    Bryan J. Bloomer;Bryan J. Bloomer;Jeffrey W. Stehr;Charles A. Piety;Ross J. Salawitch

  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion

    D. W. Fahey;S. R. Kawa;E. L. Woodbridge;P. Tin

  • The detection of large HNO3-containing particles in the winter Arctic stratosphere.

    D. W. Fahey;R. S. Gao;K. S. Carslaw;J. Kettleborough

  • The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes

    Simone Tilmes;Rolf Müller;Ross Salawitch

  • The ACOS CO 2 retrieval algorithm – Part II: Global X CO 2 data characterization

    D. Crisp;B. M. Fisher;C. O'Dell;C. Frankenberg

  • Sensitivity of Ozone to Bromine in the Lower Stratosphere

    R. J. Salawitch;D. K. Weisenstein;L. J. Kovalenko;C. E. Sioris

  • Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments

    Veronika Eyring;Jean-François Lamarque;Peter Hess;Florian Arfeuille

  • A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space

    D. Wunch;P. O. Wennberg;G. C. Toon;B. J. Connor

  • Glacial-to-interglacial variations in the carbon isotopic composition of atmospheric CO 2

    Bruno D. Marino;Michael B. McElroy;Ross J. Salawitch;W. G. Spaulding

  • The Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) Experiment: Deployment on the ATLAS Space Shuttle Missions

    Michael R. Gunson;M. M. Abbas;M. C. Abrams;M. Allen

  • Changing composition of the global stratosphere.

    Michael B. McElroy;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Absorption of solar radiation by O2 - Implications for O3 and lifetimes of N2O, CFCl3, and CF2Cl2

    K. Minschwaner;R. J. Salawitch;M. B. McElroy

  • Emission Measurements of the Concorde Supersonic Aircraft in the Lower Stratosphere

    D. W. Fahey;E. R. Keim;K. A. Boering;C. A. Brock

  • Agricultural Green Revolution as a driver of increasing atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplitude

    Ning Zeng;Fang Zhao;George J. Collatz;Eugenia Kalnay

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Russell R. Dickerson
Russell R. Dickerson University of Maryland, College Park
Paul O. Wennberg
Paul O. Wennberg California Institute of Technology
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Thomas F. Hanisco
Thomas F. Hanisco Goddard Space Flight Center
Ru-Shan Gao
Ru-Shan Gao National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Max Loewenstein
Max Loewenstein Ames Research Center
Markus Rex
Markus Rex Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Elliot L Atlas
Elliot L Atlas University of Miami
M. J. Newchurch
M. J. Newchurch University of Alabama in Huntsville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge. For students interested in understanding human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology can provide valuable insights. This helps bridge the gap between environmental science and social systems.

For educators aiming to specialize in environmental education or policy, advanced degrees like an online EdD no dissertation offer flexible options to enhance leadership skills without the heavy research commitments of traditional programs. Furthermore, students may explore seamless transitions with online EdS to EdD programs, which support continued professional growth in fields related to sustainability and environmental advocacy.

Additionally, professionals seeking higher clinical or community impact roles can consider online DSW programs, which blend social work practice and environmental justice perspectives. These pathways highlight the interconnectedness of environment, society, and education, providing well-rounded career opportunities for graduates in this evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Ross J. Salawitch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles