World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martyn P. Chipperfield

Martyn P. Chipperfield

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
96
Citations
32057
World Ranking
465
National Ranking
33

Martyn P. Chipperfield publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martyn P. Chipperfield sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 612 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Martyn P. Chipperfield D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martyn P. Chipperfield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2020 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Martyn P. Chipperfield is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on atmospheric and climate sciences. The main subfields of study include Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oceanography, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Their work covers several key topics, including Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Climate Variability and Models, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics.

Chipperfield has contributed extensively to scientific literature, often collaborating with researchers such as Wuhu Feng, Sandip Dhomse, Richard J. Pope, Chris Wilson, and Richard Siddans. The frequency of their coauthored works reflects sustained research partnerships.

They have published a substantial number of papers in various scientific journals and venues. The most frequent publication venues are Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Nature, and Geophysical Research Letters.

Recent notable papers include:

  • A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks, 2020, Nature
  • Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere-troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, 2020, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion, 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • A decline in global CFC-11 emissions during 2018−2019, 2021, Nature
  • Renewed and emerging concerns over the production and emission of ozone-depleting substances, 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

Martyn P. Chipperfield was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks

    Hanquin Tian;Rongting Xu;Josep G. Canadell;Rona L. Thompson

  • Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model

    G. W. Mann;K. S. Carslaw;D. V. Spracklen;D. A. Ridley

  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

    V. Eyring;N. Butchart;D. W. Waugh;H. Akiyoshi

  • Multiannual simulations with a three‐dimensional chemical transport model

    M. P. Chipperfield

  • New version of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT off‐line chemical transport model: Intercomparison of stratospheric tracer experiments

    M. P. Chipperfield

  • Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations

    Dominick V. Spracklen;Kenneth S. Carslaw;Markku Kulmala;Veli-Matti Kerminen

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Acceleration of global N2O emissions seen from two decades of atmospheric inversion

    R. L. Thompson;L. Lassaletta;P. K. Patra;C. Wilson

  • Arctic ozone loss and climate change

    M. Rex;R. J. Salawitch;P. von der Gathen;N. R. P. Harris

  • Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

    V. Eyring;D. W. Waugh;G. E. Bodeker;Eugene C. Cordero

  • Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

    S.-W. Son.;E. P. Gerber;J. Perlwitz;J. Perlwitz;L. M. Polvani

  • Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002

    S. A. Montzka;P. J. Fraser;J. H. Butler;D. M. Cunnold

  • Chemistry-Climate Model Simulations of Twenty- First Century Stratospheric Climate and Circulation Changes

    Neal Butchart;I. Cionni;V. Eyring;T. G. Shepherd

  • Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using 222Rn and other short-lived tracers

    Daniel James Jacob;Michael J. Prather;Philip J. Rasch;Run-Lie Shia

  • TransCom model simulations of CH4 and related species: linking transport, surface flux and chemical loss with CH4 variability in the troposphere and lower stratosphere

    P. K. Patra;S. Houweling;Maarten Krol;Maarten Krol;P. Bousquet

  • Persistent shift of the Arctic polar vortex towards the Eurasian continent in recent decades

    Jiankai Zhang;Wenshou Tian;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Fei Xie

  • Prolonged stratospheric ozone loss in the 1995–96 Arctic winter

    Markus Rex;Neil R. P. Harris;Peter von der Gathen;Ralph Lehmann

  • A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: I. Model development and prediction of aerosol properties

    D. V. Spracklen;K. J. Pringle;K. S. Carslaw;M. P. Chipperfield

  • Detecting recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer

    Martyn P. Chipperfield;Slimane Bekki;Sandip Dhomse;Neil R. P. Harris

  • Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1

    Alexander T. Archibald;Fiona M. O'Connor;Nathan Luke Abraham;Scott Archer-Nicholls

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

Frequent Co-Authors

Wuhu Feng
Wuhu Feng University of Leeds
Sandip Dhomse
Sandip Dhomse University of Leeds
John A. Pyle
John A. Pyle University of Cambridge
Ryan Hossaini
Ryan Hossaini Lancaster University
Slimane Bekki
Slimane Bekki Sorbonne University
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Klaus Pfeilsticker
Klaus Pfeilsticker Heidelberg University
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Florence Goutail
Florence Goutail Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various related online degree programs offer versatile career opportunities. For example, exploring online dsw programs can help professionals delve into social work, enhancing community involvement and policy development related to environmental justice.

Students seeking cost-effective options should consider pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This flexible pathway allows learners to tailor their education toward environmental topics alongside other disciplines, creating a personalized academic experience without high expenses.

For those unsure about their specific focus, investigating what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get could provide insight into degree programs that balance workload with value, helping students make informed decisions while maintaining academic success.

In addition, specializing in earth sciences through online geology programs offers a direct route to careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation, all of which align closely with environmental science principles.

These related pathways emphasize the importance of flexibility, affordability, and relevance, helping students navigate the diverse professional landscapes connected to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Martyn P. Chipperfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles