World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
6978
World Ranking
4835
National Ranking
208

Florence Goutail publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Goutail sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 274 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Florence Goutail D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Goutail sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Florence Goutail is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily spans across Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focused expertise in Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Additional subfields include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, as well as Environmental Engineering.

The principal research topics covered by Goutail involve Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, as well as the impact of COVID-19 on air quality and related Air Quality and Health Impacts. The scope also includes Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Frequent coauthors in Goutail's research network include Andréa Pazmiño, Georg Hansen, Boyan Petkov, Tove Svendby, and Alkiviadis Bais, representing collaboration across multiple studies and publications.

Key venues for publishing Goutail's scientific work include Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Atmospheric measurement techniques, and Geophysical Research Letters.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Florence Goutail are:

  • Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO 2 measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks, 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Antarctic Ozone Enhancement During the 2019 Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV NO 2 climate data records with ground-based DOAS networks: the role of measurement and comparison uncertainties, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Unprecedented Spring 2020 Ozone Depletion in the Context of 20 Years of Measurements at Eureka, Canada, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic related to lockdown measures on tropospheric NO 2 columns over Île-de-France, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5p TROPOMI NO 2 measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks

    Tijl Verhoelst;Steven Compernolle;Gaia Pinardi;Jean-Christopher Lambert

  • O3 and NO2 ground‐based measurements by visible spectrometry during Arctic winter and spring 1988

    Jean Pierre Pommereau;Florence Goutail

  • Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

    E.A. Celarier;E.J. Brinksma;J.F. Gleason;J.P. Veefkind

  • Validation of SAGE II ozone measurements

    D. M. Cunnold;J. M. Zawodny;W. P. Chu;J. P. Pommereau

  • Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

    E. Dupuy;K.A. Walker;K.A. Walker;J. Kar;C.D. Boone

  • TROPOMI/S5P total ozone column data: global ground-based validation and consistency with other satellite missions

    Katerina Garane;Maria-Elissavet Koukouli;Tijl Verhoelst;Christophe Lerot

  • Slant column measurements of O3 and NO2 during the NDSC intercomparison of zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers in June 1996

    H. K. Roscoe;P. V. Johnston;M. Van Roozendael;A. Richter

  • The Cabauw Intercomparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI): design, execution, and early results

    A. J. M. Piters;K. F. Boersma;M. Kroon;J. C. Hains

  • NDACC/SAOZ UV-visible total ozone measurements: improved retrieval and comparison with correlative ground-based and satellite observations

    F. Hendrick;Jean-Pierre Pommereau;Florence Goutail;R. D. Evans

  • Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO 2 and O 4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers

    HK Roscoe;Van M Roozendael;C Fayt;du A Piesanie

  • Retrieval of stratospheric O3 and NO2 profiles from Odin Optical Spectrograph and Infrared Imager System (OSIRIS) limb‐scattered sunlight measurements

    Craig S. Haley;Samuel M. Brohede;Christopher E. Sioris;Christopher E. Sioris;Erik Griffioen;Erik Griffioen

  • An intercomparison campaign of ground-based UV-visible measurements of NO2, BrO, and OClO slant columns: Methods of analysis and results for NO2

    A.-C. Vandaele;C. Fayt;F. Hendrick;C. Hermans

  • Intercomparison of UV/visible spectrometers for measurements of stratospheric NO2 for the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change

    David Hofmann;Paolo Bonasoni;Martine De Maziere;Franco Evangelisti

  • Latitudinal and vertical distribution of bromine monoxide in the lower stratosphere from Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography limb scattering measurements

    C.E. Sioris;C.E. Sioris;L.J. Kovalenko;C.A. Mclinden;R.J. Salawitch

  • Comparison of empirically derived ozone losses in the Arctic vortex

    N. R. P. Harris;M. Rex;F. Goutail;B. M. Knudsen

  • Year‐round record of surface ozone at coastal (Dumont d'Urville) and inland (Concordia) sites in East Antarctica

    Michel Legrand;S. Preunkert;Benjamin Jourdain;H. Gallée

  • Validation of ground-based visible measurements of total ozone by comparison with Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers

    M. Van Roozendael;P. Peeters;H. K. Roscoe;H. De Backer

  • Retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO columns from multi-axis DOAS measurements at Reunion Island (21 S, 56 E)

    N. Theys;M. van Roozendael;F. Hendrick;C. Fayt

  • Depletion of Column ozone in the Arctic during the winters of 1993-94 and 1994-95

    F. Goutail;J.-P. Pommereau;C. Phillips;C. Deniel

  • Stratospheric O3 and NO2 observations at the southern polar circle in summer and fall 1988

    Jean Pierre Pommereau;Florence Goutail

  • Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements

    Anne Boynard;Daniel Hurtmans;Katerina Garane;Florence Goutail

  • Antarctic Ozone Enhancement During the 2019 Sudden Stratospheric Warming Event

    Sarah Safieddine;Marie Bouillon;Ana‐claudia Paracho;Julien Jumelet

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Pierre Pommereau
Jean-Pierre Pommereau Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
M. Van Roozendael
M. Van Roozendael Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Jean-Christopher Lambert
Jean-Christopher Lambert Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy
Martyn P. Chipperfield
Martyn P. Chipperfield University of Leeds
Esko Kyrö
Esko Kyrö Finnish Meteorological Institute
Howard K. Roscoe
Howard K. Roscoe British Antarctic Survey
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
Wuhu Feng
Wuhu Feng University of Leeds
Klaus Pfeilsticker
Klaus Pfeilsticker Heidelberg University
Kimberly Strong
Kimberly Strong University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary understanding. For instance, a bachelors degree in sociology online can complement environmental studies by providing insights into human behavior, societal impacts, and environmental justice issues.

Graduate-level options also offer flexibility for working professionals. Many aspiring leaders in environmental policy or education opt for doctoral programs online no dissertation, which allow a faster path to advanced credentials without the traditional dissertation requirement.

If your interest lies in educational leadership within environmental fields, the best online eds to edd programs offer a range of options designed for educators seeking to impact environmental curriculum development and policy.

Finally, for those aiming to support communities affected by environmental challenges, pursuing a online dsw programs can provide advanced social work expertise to address complex social and environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Florence Goutail

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles