World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
11930
World Ranking
3278
National Ranking
221

Mark Weber publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Weber sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 288 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mark Weber D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Weber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Weber is affiliated with the University of Bremen in Germany and specializes in research within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work predominantly focuses on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, supported by contributions in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The primary research topics explored by Mark Weber include Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Advanced Neural Network Applications, Calibration and Measurement Techniques, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Mark Weber's publications appear frequently in a number of scientific venues, with notable counts including:

  • Atmospheric measurement techniques (9 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (8 publications)
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics (7 publications)
  • Journal of Crohn s and Colitis (4 publications)
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (3 publications)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Weber showcase a range of interdisciplinary topics spanning atmospheric and chemical sciences:

  • Global total ozone recovery trends attributed to ozone-depleting substance (ODS) changes derived from five merged ozone datasets, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Arctic Ozone Depletion in 2019/20: Roles of Chemistry, Dynamics and the Montreal Protocol, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • On the Financing Benefits of Supply Chain Transparency and Blockchain Adoption, 2020, Management Science
  • DynamicEarthNet: Daily Multi-Spectral Satellite Dataset for Semantic Change Segmentation, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Mechanically robust and stretchable organic solar cells plasticized by small-molecule acceptors, 2025, Science

Co-author collaborations form a significant component of Mark Weber's scientific work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alexei Rozanov
  • Carlo Arosio
  • John P. Burrows
  • Sandip Dhomse
  • Wuhu Feng

Apart from research articles, Mark Weber has contributed to book publications, including a title published by New York University Press eBooks titled Disability Harassment in 2022.

Best Publications

  • The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results

    John P. Burrows;Mark Weber;Michael Buchwitz;Vladimir Rozanov

  • High spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections - Part 2: Temperature dependence

    A. Serdyuchenko;V. Gorshelev;M. Weber;W. Chehade

  • Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling

    I. Ermolli;K. Matthes;T. Dudok de Wit;N. A. Krivova

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • The 1997 spectroscopic GEISA databank

    N. Jacquinet-Husson;E. Arié;J. Ballard;A. Barbe

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Detecting recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer

    Martyn P. Chipperfield;Slimane Bekki;Sandip Dhomse;Neil R. P. Harris

  • The Mg II index: A proxy for solar EUV

    Rodney Viereck;Lawrence Puga;Donald McMullin;Darrell Judge

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • High spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections – Part 1: Measurements, data analysis and comparison with previous measurements around 293 K

    V. Gorshelev;A. Serdyuchenko;M. Weber;W. Chehade

  • The Brewer-Dobson circulation and total ozone from seasonal to decadal time scales

    Mark Weber;S. Dikty;J.P. Burrows;Hella Garny

  • Total ozone trends from 1979 to 2016 derived from five merged observational datasets - the emergence into ozone recovery

    Mark Weber;Melanie Coldewey-Egbers;Vitali E. Fioletov;Stacey M. Frith

  • An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016

    Wolfgang Steinbrecht;Lucien Froidevaux;Ryan Fuller;Ray Wang

  • On the Cause of Recent Variations in Lower Stratospheric Ozone

    Martyn P. Chipperfield;Sandip Dhomse;Ryan Hossaini;Wuhu Feng

  • Comparison of Models Used for UV Index Calculations

    Peter Koepke;Alkiviadis Bais;Dimitrios Balis;Michael Buchwitz

  • Ozone trends at northern mid- and high latitudes - a European perspective

    N. R. P. Harris;E. Kyrö;J. Staehelin;Dennis Brunner

  • A composite Mg II index spanning from 1978 to 2003

    Rodney A. Viereck;Linton E. Floyd;Patrick C. Crane;Thomas N. Woods

  • Dynamical control of NH and SH winter/spring total ozone from GOME observations in 1995-2002

    M. Weber;S. Dhomse;F. Wittrock;A. Richter

  • Total ozone retrieval from GOME UV spectral data using the weighting function DOAS approach

    M. Coldewey-Egbers;M. Weber;L. N. Lamsal;R. de Beek

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (Gome) : Mission, instrument concept, and first scientific results

    J. P. Burrows;M. Buchwitz;V. Rozanov;M. Weber

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
Sandip Dhomse
Sandip Dhomse University of Leeds
Vladimir V. Rozanov
Vladimir V. Rozanov University of Bremen
Astrid Bracher
Astrid Bracher University of Bremen
Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Wolfgang Steinbrecht German Meteorological Service
Andreas Richter
Andreas Richter University of Bremen
Lucien Froidevaux
Lucien Froidevaux California Institute of Technology
Diego Loyola
Diego Loyola German Aerospace Center
Johanna Tamminen
Johanna Tamminen Finnish Meteorological Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various specialized fields and career paths. For students seeking a manageable academic workload, exploring the easy bachelor's degree options can provide a great starting point, allowing them to balance study with other commitments.

Those interested in Earth's physical structure and processes may find online geology programs appealing. The online geology programs featured offer flexible learning and access to expert knowledge without relocating.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis and planning. Many professionals enhance their skills through advanced degrees. For example, the top GIS masters programs focus on practical and technical expertise, boosting career prospects in this growing sector.

Leadership in environmental policy and management often requires public administration skills. The easiest online mpa programs offer accelerated paths to gain these competencies, enabling professionals to contribute effectively to sustainable development and governance.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles