World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7932
World Ranking
6713
National Ranking
101

Johanna Tamminen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna Tamminen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 226 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Johanna Tamminen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna Tamminen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johanna Tamminen is affiliated with the Finnish Meteorological Institute in Finland, where their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with specific attention to Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, notably Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional contributions to Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics covered in Tamminen's research encompass Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, as well as Atmospheric aerosols and clouds. They have also contributed to studies in Cryospheric observations, Air Quality and Health Impacts, and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena.

Tamminen's publications appear frequently in several scientific venues, reflecting an emphasis on atmospheric measurement and remote sensing. Key journals where they have published multiple papers include Atmospheric measurement techniques, Remote Sensing, and Atmospheric chemistry and physics. They have also contributed to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society and Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

Some recent papers by Tamminen include:

  • Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic, 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Toward an Operational Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions Monitoring and Verification Support Capacity, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Measurement report: regional trends of stratospheric ozone evaluated using the MErged GRIdded Dataset of Ozone Profiles (MEGRIDOP), 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Validation of the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) surface UV radiation product, 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Analyzing Local Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Space Using the Divergence Method: An Application to the Synthetic SMARTCARB Dataset, 2022, Frontiers in Remote Sensing

Throughout their career, Tamminen has collaborated frequently with several scholars in their field. Notable frequent coauthors include Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Janne Hakkarainen, Tomi Karppinen, Dominik Brunner, and Antti Arola.

Best Publications

  • Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic

    Unknown

  • Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument

    P.F. Levelt;E. Hilsenrath;G.W. Leppelmeier;G.H.J. van den Oord

  • The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space

    Pieternel F. Levelt;Joanna Joiner;Johanna Tamminen;J. Pepijn Veefkind

  • The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes

    A. Eldering;P. O. Wennberg;D. Crisp;D. Schimel

  • Componentwise adaptation for high dimensional MCMC

    Heikki Haario;Eero Saksman;Johanna Tamminen

  • Direct space-based observations of anthropogenic CO2 emission areas from OCO-2

    J. Hakkarainen;I. Ialongo;J. Tamminen

  • Impact of different energies of precipitating particles on NOx generation in the middle and upper atmosphere during geomagnetic storms

    Esa Turunen;Pekka T. Verronen;Annika Seppälä;Craig J. Rodger

  • Validation of daily erythemal doses from Ozone Monitoring Instrument with ground‐based UV measurement data

    Aapo Tanskanen;Anders Lindfors;Anu Määttä;Nickolay Krotkov

  • Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends

    Neil R. P Harris;B Hassler;B Hassler;F Tummon;G E Bodeker

  • Toward an operational anthropogenic CO2 emissions monitoring and verification support capacity

    G. Janssens-Maenhout;B. Pinty;M. Dowell;H. Zunker

  • GOMOS on Envisat: an overview

    E. Kyrölä;J. Tamminen;G.W. Leppelmeier;V. Sofieva

  • Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for high dimensional inversion in remote sensing

    H. Haario;M. Laine;M. Lehtinen;E. Saksman

  • Arctic and Antarctic polar winter NOx and energetic particle precipitation in 2002–2006

    Annika Seppälä;Pekka T. Verronen;Mark A. Clilverd;Cora E. Randall

  • Efficient MCMC for Climate Model Parameter Estimation: Parallel Adaptive Chains and Early Rejection

    Antti Solonen;Pirkka Ollinaho;Marko Laine;Heikki Haario

  • Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone

    E. Kyrölä;M. Laine;V. Sofieva;J. Tamminen

  • Absorption cross-sections of Ozone in the ultraviolet and visible spectral regions – Status report 2015

    Johannes Orphal;Johannes Staehelin;Johanna Tamminen;Geir Braathen

  • Global ozone monitoring by occultation of stars: an overview of GOMOS measurements on ENVISAT

    Jean-Loup Bertaux;E. Kyrölä;D. Fussen;Alain Hauchecorne

  • Retrieval of atmospheric parameters from GOMOS data

    E. Kyrölä;J. Tamminen;V. Sofieva;J. L. Bertaux

  • Production of odd hydrogen in the mesosphere during the January 2005 solar proton event

    Pekka T. Verronen;Annika Seppälä;Erkki Kyrölä;Johanna Tamminen

  • Destruction of the tertiary ozone maximum during a solar proton event

    A. Seppälä;P. T. Verronen;V. F. Sofieva;J. Tamminen

  • A new approach to correct for absorbing aerosols in OMI UV

    A. Arola;S. Kazadzis;A. Lindfors;A. Lindfors;N. Krotkov

  • Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 1: Measurement techniques, uncertainties and availability

    B. Hassler;B. Hassler;I. Petropavlovskikh;I. Petropavlovskikh;J. Staehelin;T. August

Frequent Co-Authors

Erkki Kyrölä
Erkki Kyrölä Finnish Meteorological Institute
Alain Hauchecorne
Alain Hauchecorne University of Paris-Saclay
Pekka T. Verronen
Pekka T. Verronen Finnish Meteorological Institute
Annika Seppälä
Annika Seppälä University of Otago
Jean-Loup Bertaux
Jean-Loup Bertaux Atmospheres Laboratory Environments, Observations Spatiales
Kaley A. Walker
Kaley A. Walker University of Toronto
Nickolay A. Krotkov
Nickolay A. Krotkov Goddard Space Flight Center
Heikki Haario
Heikki Haario Lappeenranta University of Technology
Mark Weber
Mark Weber University of Bremen
Adam Bourassa
Adam Bourassa University of Saskatchewan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career options, many of which intersect with other dynamic fields. For instance, a gis degree equips students with essential skills in spatial data analysis, crucial for environmental planning and natural resource management.

For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy or public administration, exploring 1 year mpa programs can be a strategic move. These programs offer accelerated learning paths to develop expertise in managing public sector projects related to sustainability and environmental regulation.

Complementing environmental studies, an online bachelors in sociology provides valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts, which are critical for designing effective community-based environmental initiatives.

For professionals aiming for advanced credentials without the time commitment of a dissertation, there are doctoral programs online no dissertation that focus on applied research and practical outcomes, aligning well with career growth in environmental education and policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Johanna Tamminen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles