World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4269
World Ranking
12259
National Ranking
219

Luca Martino publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Martino sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Luca Martino D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Martino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luca Martino is affiliated with King Juan Carlos University in Spain and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, focusing on areas such as artificial intelligence and statistics and probability. Their research spans across related subfields including statistics, probability and uncertainty, signal processing, and global and planetary change.

The scientist's work particularly emphasizes topics such as Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference, probabilistic and robust engineering design, and target tracking and data fusion in sensor networks. Additional research interests include Bayesian methods and mixture models, statistical methods and inference, Markov chains and Monte Carlo methods, as well as statistical methods and Bayesian inference.

Martino has published multiple research papers across various scientific venues. Some of their recent works include:

  • A Joint introduction to Gaussian Processes and Relevance Vector Machines with Connections to Kalman filtering and other Kernel Smoothers, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Survey of Active Learning for Quantifying Vegetation Traits from Terrestrial Earth Observation Data, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Rethinking the Effective Sample Size, 2022, International Statistical Review
  • Marginal Likelihood Computation for Model Selection and Hypothesis Testing: An Extensive Review, 2023, SIAM Review
  • Importance Gaussian Quadrature, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Fernando Llorente, David Delgado-Gómez, Víctor Elvira, Ernesto Curbelo, and Gustau Camps-Valls. These collaborations have resulted in numerous coauthored publications.

Luca Martino's research is published predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Mathematics, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Computational Statistics, and SSRN Electronic Journal. Their work reflects a broad engagement with both theoretical and applied aspects of computer science, with a focus on statistical and probabilistic methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Moving Fast with Software Verification

    Cristiano Calcagno;Dino Distefano;Jérémy Dubreil;Dominik Gabi

  • Adaptive Importance Sampling: The past, the present, and the future

    Monica F. Bugallo;Victor Elvira;Luca Martino;David Luengo

  • Effective sample size for importance sampling based on discrepancy measures

    Luca Martino;Víctor Elvira;Francisco Louzada

  • A survey of Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation

    David Luengo;Luca Martino;Luca Martino;Mónica F. Bugallo;Victor Elvira

  • Cooperative parallel particle filters for online model selection and applications to urban mobility

    Luca Martino;Jesse Read;Jesse Read;Víctor Elvira;Francisco Louzada

  • Efficient monte carlo methods for multi-dimensional learning with classifier chains

    Jesse Read;Luca Martino;David Luengo

  • Independent Doubly Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling Within Gibbs Sampling

    Luca Martino;Jesse Read;David Luengo

  • Generalized Multiple Importance Sampling

    Víctor Elvira;Luca Martino;David Luengo;Mónica F. Bugallo

  • Improving population Monte Carlo

    Víctor Elvira;Luca Martino;David Luengo;Mónica F. Bugallo

  • A Survey of Active Learning for Quantifying Vegetation Traits from Terrestrial Earth Observation Data

    Katja Berger;Juan Pablo Rivera Caicedo;Luca Martino;Matthias Wocher

  • An Adaptive Population Importance Sampler: Learning From Uncertainty

    Luca Martino;Victor Elvira;David Luengo;Jukka Corander

  • Layered adaptive importance sampling

    L. Martino;V. Elvira;D. Luengo;J. Corander

  • Scalable multi-output label prediction

    Jesse Read;Luca Martino;Pablo M. Olmos;David Luengo

  • Physics-aware Gaussian processes in remote sensing

    Gustau Camps-Valls;Luca Martino;Daniel H. Svendsen;Manuel Campos-Taberner

  • Orthogonal parallel MCMC methods for sampling and optimization

    Luca Martino;Víctor Elvira;David Luengo;Jukka Corander

  • Generalized Multiple Importance Sampling

    Víctor Elvira;Luca Martino;David Luengo;Mónica F. Bugallo

  • Marginal likelihood computation for model selection and hypothesis testing: an extensive review.

    Fernando Llorente;Luca Martino;David Delgado;Javier López-Santiago

  • Adaptive importance sampling in signal processing

    Mónica F. Bugallo;Luca Martino;Jukka Corander

  • A Review of Multiple Try MCMC Algorithms for Signal Processing

    Luca Martino;Luca Martino

  • Marginal Likelihood Computation for Model Selection and Hypothesis Testing: an Extensive Review

    F. Llorente;L. Martino;D. Delgado;J. Lopez-Santiago

  • Efficient Multiple Importance Sampling Estimators

    Victor Elvira;Luca Martino;David Luengo;Monica F. Bugallo

  • Group Importance Sampling for particle filtering and MCMC

    Luca Martino;Luca Martino;Víctor Elvira;Gustau Camps-Valls

  • A Joint introduction to Gaussian Processes and Relevance Vector Machines with Connections to Kalman filtering and other Kernel Smoothers

    Luca Martino;Jesse Read

  • Advances in Importance Sampling

    Víctor Elvira;Luca Martino

  • Layered Adaptive Importance Sampling

    L. Martino;V. Elvira;D. Luengo;J. Corander

  • Improving Population Monte Carlo: Alternative Weighting

    Luca Martino;David Luengo;F. Bugallo

Frequent Co-Authors

Jesse Read
Jesse Read École Polytechnique
Francisco Louzada
Francisco Louzada Universidade de São Paulo
Gustau Camps-Valls
Gustau Camps-Valls University of Valencia
Jukka Corander
Jukka Corander University of Oslo
Jordi Muñoz-Marí
Jordi Muñoz-Marí University of Valencia
Jochem Verrelst
Jochem Verrelst University of Valencia
Petar M. Djuric
Petar M. Djuric Stony Brook University
Luis Alonso
Luis Alonso Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Jose Moreno
Jose Moreno University of Valencia
Steven W. Running
Steven W. Running University of Montana

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree options and career pathways. For students interested in applying computational thinking to real-world problems, pursuing an environmental engineering degree online could be a smart choice. This path combines computer skills with environmental problem-solving.

Those passionate about innovation and technology might consider an online degree in mechanical engineering. This field leverages computer modeling and design tools, providing versatile options for technical careers.

For students curious about the fundamental laws of the universe, it’s worthwhile to ask can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—many reputable programs now offer flexible online physics degrees integrating computational methods.

Lastly, with data influencing every industry, a data science degree is a fast-growing option. Data science programs build on computer science foundations and can lead to in-demand roles in analytics, tech, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Luca Martino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles