World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5773
World Ranking
12988
National Ranking
245

Mateu Sbert publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mateu Sbert sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 304 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mateu Sbert D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mateu Sbert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mateu Sbert is a researcher affiliated with the University of Girona in Spain. Their work primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics covered in their research involve Data Visualization and Analytics, Statistical Mechanics and Entropy, Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques, Visual Attention and Saliency Detection, Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design, Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods, and Probability and Risk Models.

Mateu Sbert has contributed to multiple scientific publications, with key recent papers including:

  • Generalizing the Balance Heuristic Estimator in Multiple Importance Sampling, 2022, Entropy
  • Robust Multiple Importance Sampling with Tsallis φ-Divergences, 2022, Entropy
  • Histogram Ordering, 2021, IEEE Access

Other works appearing alongside frequent coauthors, though not authored by Sbert, include papers by Min Chen published in Entropy exploring measures for estimating the benefit of visualization.

Frequent collaborators of Mateu Sbert include:

  • Min Chen
  • Miquel Feixas
  • Jordi Poch
  • Màrius Vila
  • Qiaohong Hao

Mateu Sbert's research has been predominantly disseminated through publication venues such as:

  • Entropy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Access
  • 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
  • Virtual Reality

Their contributions to Computer Vision and related statistical methods have been cited across various articles, reflecting an active engagement in topics related to entropy, visualization techniques, and importance sampling.

Best Publications

  • Viewpoint Selection using Viewpoint Entropy

    Pere-Pau Vázquez;Miquel Feixas;Mateu Sbert;Wolfgang Heidrich

  • Serious games for health

    Voravika Wattanasoontorn;Imma Boada;Rubén Jesús García;Mateu Sbert

  • Importance-Driven Focus of Attention

    I. Viola;M. Feixas;M. Sbert;M.E. Groller

  • Dense-Haze: A Benchmark for Image Dehazing with Dense-Haze and Haze-Free Images

    Codruta O. Ancuti;Cosmin Ancuti;Mateu Sbert;Radu Timofte

  • Automatic View Selection Using Viewpoint Entropy and its Application to Image-Based Modelling

    Pere-Pau Vázquez;Miquel Feixas;Mateu Sbert;Wolfgang Heidrich

  • A unified information-theoretic framework for viewpoint selection and mesh saliency

    Miquel Feixas;Mateu Sbert;Francisco González

  • Informational Aesthetics Measures

    J. Rigau;M. Feixas;M. Sbert

  • Color Channel Compensation (3C): A Fundamental Pre-Processing Step for Image Enhancement

    Codruta O. Ancuti;Cosmin Ancuti;Christophe De Vleeschouwer;Mateu Sbert

  • Using a serious game to complement CPR instruction in a nurse faculty

    Imma Boada;Antonio Rodriguez-Benitez;Juan Manuel Garcia-Gonzalez;Josep Olivet

  • Fast, realistic lighting for video games

    A. Iones;A. Krupkin;M. Sbert;S. Zhukov

  • Automatic Transfer Functions Based on Informational Divergence

    M. Ruiz;A. Bardera;I. Boada;I. Viola

  • An information theory framework for the analysis of scene complexity

    Miquel Feixas;Esteve del Acebo;Philippe Bekaert;Mateu Sbert

  • Viewpoint quality: measures and applications

    Mateu Sbert;Dimitri Plemenos;Miquel Feixas;Francisco González

  • Computational Aesthetics 2008: Categorizing art: Comparing humans and computers

    Christian Wallraven;Roland Fleming;Douglas Cunningham;Jaume Rigau

  • Multimodal Data Fusion Based on Mutual Information

    R. Bramon;I. Boada;A. Bardera;J. Rodriguez

  • An Integral Geometry Based Method for Fast Form‐Factor Computation

    Mateu Sbert

  • Image Segmentation Using Information Bottleneck Method

    A. Bardera;J. Rigau;I. Boada;M. Feixas

  • An information-theoretic framework for image complexity

    J. Rigau;M. Feixas;M. Sbert

  • Hierarchical Monte Carlo Radiosity

    Philippe Bekaert;László Neumann;Attila Neumann;Mateu Sbert

  • Conceptualizing Birkhoff's aesthetic measure using Shannon entropy and Kolmogorov complexity

    Jaume Rigau;Miquel Feixas;Mateu Sbert

  • Medical Image Segmentation Based on Mutual Information Maximization

    Jaume Rigau;Miquel Feixas;Mateu Sbert;Anton Bardera

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan Viola
Ivan Viola King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Min Chen
Min Chen University of Oxford
Christian Wallraven
Christian Wallraven Korea University
Han-Wei Shen
Han-Wei Shen The Ohio State University
Wolfgang Heidrich
Wolfgang Heidrich King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Xiaopeng Zhang
Xiaopeng Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Radu Timofte
Radu Timofte University of Wurzburg
Deborah Silver
Deborah Silver Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christophe De Vleeschouwer
Christophe De Vleeschouwer Université Catholique de Louvain
John A. Howell
John A. Howell University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and diverse career paths. Many students are now turning to flexible online programs to accelerate their education and reduce costs. For those seeking expedient options, consider the fastest computer science degree programs, which allow you to earn your qualification in less time while building essential tech skills.

If you are interested in the intersection of technology and environmental sustainability, pursuing an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can help you combine computing with real-world impact. Engineering paths are also increasingly affordable—explore the mechanical engineering degree cost at a range of accredited institutions to see how you can broaden your opportunities without breaking the bank.

For those drawn to scientific theory and analytical problem-solving, an online theoretical physics degree can complement a computing background and lead to research or technical roles. With these online degrees, you can tailor your education to your career goals while enjoying flexibility in timing, location, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Mateu Sbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles