World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 58 3622 3520 62 61 222 13848

George Drettakis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George Drettakis between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George Drettakis published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 14 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 8 publications
1987 2025

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George Drettakis: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 6
1996 4
1997 10
1998 7
1999 7
2000 5
2001 4
2002 15
2003 9
2004 10
2005 7
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 9
2010 17
2011 16
2012 7
2013 15
2014 7
2015 7
2016 7
2017 5
2018 7
2019 4
2020 5
2021 5
2022 5
2023 6
2024 6
2025 8
Total 249
Download as CSV

George Drettakis publications per year - data summary

  • George Drettakis, a Computer Science scholar from French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA, has 249 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1988, 1990, 1991 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 39 years in the span carries no publications at all (1989).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.6 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 30 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 42 publications (3.2 per year); 2000-2012: 120 publications (9.2 per year); 2013-2025: 87 publications (6.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

George Drettakis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Drettakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 222–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 222 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437 222
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

George Drettakis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • George Drettakis, a Computer Science scholar from French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA, records 222 publications - the 54th percentile of the discipline.
  • 54% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than George Drettakis, and about 46% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and George Drettakis ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

George Drettakis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Drettakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400 58
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

George Drettakis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • George Drettakis, a Computer Science scholar from French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA, records 58 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than George Drettakis, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and George Drettakis ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award

Overview

George Drettakis is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant emphasis on computer vision and pattern recognition as well as computer graphics and computer-aided design.

The scientist's work spans various specialized topics including:

  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

Frequent coauthors collaborating with George Drettakis include Thomas Leimkühler, Georgios Kopanas, Bernhard Kerbl, Julien Philip, and Stavros Diolatzis. These collaborations have contributed to a sizable body of research work.

Their publications have appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Selected recent papers include:

  • 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering (2023, ACM Transactions on Graphics)
  • Point-Based Neural Rendering with Per-View Optimization (2021, Computer Graphics Forum)
  • A Hierarchical 3D Gaussian Representation for Real-Time Rendering of Very Large Datasets (2024, ACM Transactions on Graphics)
  • Neural Point Catacaustics for Novel-View Synthesis of Reflections (2022, ACM Transactions on Graphics)
  • Reducing the Memory Footprint of 3D Gaussian Splatting (2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques)

Best Publications

  • Deep blending for free-viewpoint image-based rendering

    Peter Hedman;Julien Philip;True Price;Jan-Michael Frahm

  • Perspective shadow maps

    Marc Stamminger;George Drettakis

  • Depth synthesis and local warps for plausible image-based navigation

    Gaurav Chaurasia;Sylvain Duchene;Olga Sorkine-Hornung;George Drettakis

  • Perceptual audio rendering of complex virtual environments

    Nicolas Tsingos;Emmanuel Gallo;George Drettakis

  • Interactive visualization of complex plant ecosystems

    Oliver Deussen;Carsten Colditz;Marc Stamminger;George Drettakis

  • Volumetric reconstruction and interactive rendering of trees from photographs

    Alex Reche-Martinez;Ignacio Martin;George Drettakis

  • A Feasibility Study with Image-Based Rendered Virtual Reality in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

    Valeria Manera;Emmanuelle Chapoulie;Jérémy Bourgeois;Rachid Guerchouche

  • Single-image SVBRDF capture with a rendering-aware deep network

    Valentin Deschaintre;Miika Aittala;Fredo Durand;George Drettakis

  • Efficient Impostor Manipulation for Real-Time Visualization of Urban Scenery

    François X. Sillion;George Drettakis;Benoit Bodelet

  • Conservative visibility preprocessing using extended projections

    Frédo Durand;George Drettakis;Joëlle Thollot;Claude Puech

  • Interactive rendering using the render cache

    Bruce Walter;George Drettakis;Steven Parker

  • A Survey of Procedural Noise Functions

    Ares Lagae;Sylvain Lefebvre;Robert L. Cook;Tony DeRose

  • The visibility skeleton: a powerful and efficient multi-purpose global visibility tool

    Frédo Durand;George Drettakis;Claude Puech

  • A fast shadow algorithm for area light sources using backprojection

    George Drettakis;Eugene Fiume

  • Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Virtual Environment for Architecture and Urban Planning

    George Drettakis;Maria Roussou;Alex Reche;Nicolas Tsingos

  • Procedural noise using sparse Gabor convolution

    Ares Lagae;Sylvain Lefebvre;George Drettakis;Philip Dutré

  • Interactive sampling and rendering for complex and procedural geometry

    Marc Stamminger;George Drettakis

  • Point-Based Neural Rendering with Per-View Optimization

    Georgios Kopanas;Julien Philip;Thomas Leimkühler;George Drettakis

  • Interactive virtual relighting of real scenes

    C. Loscos;G. Drettakis;L. Robert

  • Is it possible to use highly realistic virtual reality in the elderly? A feasibility study with image-based rendering

    Michel Benoit;Rachid Guerchouche;Pierre-David Petit;Emmanuelle Chapoulie

  • The Visibility Skeleton: A Powerful and Multi-Purpose Global Visibility Tool

    Frédo Durand;George Drettakis;Claude Puech

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvain Lefebvre
Sylvain Lefebvre University of Lorraine
Adrien Bousseau
Adrien Bousseau Université Côte d'Azur
François X. Sillion
François X. Sillion French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Bruce Walter
Bruce Walter Cornell University
Eugene Fiume
Eugene Fiume Simon Fraser University
Hans-Peter Seidel
Hans-Peter Seidel Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Sylvain Paris
Sylvain Paris Adobe Systems (United States)
Carsten Dachsbacher
Carsten Dachsbacher Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Tony DeRose
Tony DeRose University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many educational and career options. Prospective students can browse a variety of college programs to find specializations that best suit their aspirations, from software engineering to data analytics.

For those seeking advanced qualifications with greater flexibility, online degrees are an ideal option. Some of the easiest online masters degree programs in technology fields offer accelerated coursework and streamlined pathways for career advancement.

Doctoral study is also accessible online, helping professionals enhance their expertise without breaking the bank. There are several cheap doctorate degree online offerings that provide value while maintaining academic rigor.

Educators and aspiring leaders in computer science may consider edd online programs for a fast-track route to educational leadership roles.

Whether you’re starting your studies or aiming for the highest level, online degrees provide convenience, affordability, and a wide spectrum of options for career growth in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing George Drettakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles