World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Ronald A. Thisted publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald A. Thisted sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronald A. Thisted D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald A. Thisted sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1988 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Ronald A. Thisted is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. The academic profile of this researcher reflects a career closely linked to this institution.

Thisted has been recognized with fellowships in prominent scientific organizations, including the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 1988 and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1992. These distinctions indicate a standing within professional communities focused on statistics and science.

While specific information regarding Thisted's research topics, papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications is not detailed, the affiliations and awards suggest expertise and involvement in statistical science and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

    John T. Cacioppo;Mary Elizabeth Hughes;Linda J. Waite;Louise C. Hawkley

  • Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study.

    John T. Cacioppo;Louise C. Hawkley;Ronald A. Thisted

  • Sleep and Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis

    R M Benca;W H Obermeyer;R A Thisted;J C Gillin

  • Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

    Wendy Levinson;Audiey Kao;Alma Kuby;Ronald A. Thisted

  • Results of Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    Gerald W. Chodak;Ronald A. Thisted;Glenn S. Gerber;Jan-Erik Johansson

  • Exercise Capacity and the Risk of Death in Women The St James Women Take Heart Project

    Martha Gulati;Dilip K. Pandey;Morton F. Arnsdorf;Diane S. Lauderdale

  • Loneliness predicts increased blood pressure: 5-year cross-lagged analyses in middle-aged and older adults.

    Louise C. Hawkley;Ronald A. Thisted;Christopher M. Masi;John T. Cacioppo

  • From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study

    Louise C. Hawkley;Mary Elizabeth Hughes;Linda J. Waite;Christopher M. Masi

  • Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: Cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses.

    Louise C. Hawkley;Ronald A. Thisted;John T. Cacioppo

  • Postoperative maintenance of Crohn's disease remission with 6-mercaptopurine, mesalamine, or placebo: a 2-year trial.

    Stephen B. Hanauer;Burton I. Korelitz;Paul Rutgeerts;Mark A. Peppercorn

  • Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited-English-proficient patients.

    Elizabeth A. Jacobs;Diane S. Lauderdale;David Meltzer;Jeanette M. Shorey

  • The prognostic value of a nomogram for exercise capacity in women.

    Martha Gulati;Henry R. Black;Leslee J. Shaw;Morton F. Arnsdorf

  • Hemodynamic effects of propofol: data from over 25,000 patients.

    Hug Cc;McLeskey Ch;Nahrwold Ml;Roizen Mf

  • A meta-analysis and overview of the literature on treatment options for left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis

    Russell D Cohen;Douglas M Woseth;Ronald A Thisted;Stephen B Hanauer

  • Eye injuries after nonocular surgery. A study of 60,965 anesthetics from 1988 to 1992.

    Steven Roth;Ronald A. Thisted;John P. Erickson;Susan Black

  • Treatment of pseudobulbar affect in ALS with dextromethorphan/quinidine: a randomized trial.

    B. R. Brooks;R. A. Thisted;S. H. Appel;W. G. Bradley

  • Heart Rate Response to Exercise Stress Testing in Asymptomatic Women The St. James Women Take Heart Project

    Martha Gulati;Leslee J. Shaw;Ronald A. Thisted;Henry R. Black

  • Association of preoperative risk factors with postoperative acute renal failure

    Bruce K. Novis;Michael F. Roizen;Solomon Aronson;Ronald A. Thisted

  • Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.

    Srinivas Mantha;Michael F. Roizen;Lee A. Fleisher;Ronald Thisted

  • SPECT perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: A clinical-pathologic study

    W. Jagust;R. Thisted;M.D. Devous;R. Van Heertum

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul F. White
Paul F. White Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Linda J. Waite
Linda J. Waite University of Chicago
John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Louise C. Hawkley
Louise C. Hawkley University of Chicago
Henry R. Black
Henry R. Black New York University School of Medicine
Stephen B. Hanauer
Stephen B. Hanauer Northwestern University
Michael D. Devous
Michael D. Devous Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Wendy Levinson
Wendy Levinson University of Toronto
Edmond I. Eger
Edmond I. Eger University of California, San Francisco
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens up a wide variety of degree options and pathways—many of which can be pursued online for added flexibility. For registered nurses looking to advance quickly, adn to msn bridge programs provide an accelerated route to a master’s degree, allowing nurses to step into higher-level roles without repeating coursework.

Nutrition is another critical area in healthcare. If you're interested in promoting health through nutrition, explore online nutrition degree programs that equip you for roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health settings. Similarly, those aspiring to healthcare management can strengthen their expertise with a program from the only recognized accreditor of healthcare management: cahme accredited online MHA programs ensure your education meets top industry standards.

Additionally, if you’re a registered nurse seeking a bachelor’s degree without an in-person clinical requirement, there are rn to bsn online without clinicals options available. These pathways can help you gain new skills and increase your career mobility, all while studying remotely.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald A. Thisted

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles