World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
43664
World Ranking
5782
National Ranking
3105

Lee W. Jones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee W. Jones sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 436 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lee W. Jones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee W. Jones sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lee W. Jones is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily centers on medicine, with a significant focus on oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, physiology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as cancer survivorship and care, chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation, quality of life for childhood cancer survivors, nutrition and health in aging, cardiovascular and exercise physiology, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, and cancer risks and factors.

Frequently published in several venues, Lee W. Jones has contributed notably to:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (9 publications)
  • Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (3 publications)
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (3 publications)
  • Cancer Research (3 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (3 publications)

Some recent papers by Lee W. Jones include:

  • "Myocardial infarction accelerates breast cancer via innate immune reprogramming," 2020, Nature Medicine
  • "Prophylactic and long-lasting efficacy of senolytic CAR T cells against age-related metabolic dysfunction," 2024, Nature Aging
  • "Exercise reduces immune suppression and breast cancer progression in a preclinical model," 2020, Oncotarget
  • "Performance Status in Cancer: Not Broken, But Time for an Upgrade?" 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Association of post-diagnosis cardiorespiratory fitness with cause-specific mortality in cancer," 2020, European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Collaborating frequently with other researchers, their common coauthors include:

  • Jessica M. Scott (23 collaborations)
  • Chaya S. Moskowitz (18 collaborations)
  • Meghan Michalski (15 collaborations)
  • Jessica A. Lavery (13 collaborations)
  • Paul C. Boutros (13 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancer

    E. E. Calle;C. W. Heath;R. J. Coates;J. M. Liff

  • Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives : collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53.297 women with breast cancer and 100.239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies

    E. E. Calle;C. W. Heath;H. L. Miracle-McMahill;R. J. Coates

  • Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline

    Saro H. Armenian;Saro H. Armenian;Christina Lacchetti;Ana Barac;Joseph Carver

  • Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer - Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58 515 women with breast cancer and 95 067 women without the disease

    N Hamajima;K Hirose;K Tajima;T Rohan

  • Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise Training in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors: Cardiopulmonary and Quality of Life Outcomes

    Kerry S. Courneya;John R. Mackey;Gordon J. Bell;Lee W. Jones

  • Resistance Exercise in Men Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

    Roanne J. Segal;Robert D. Reid;Kerry S. Courneya;Shawn C. Malone

  • Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function.

    C.K. Willie;F.L. Colino;D.M. Bailey;Y.C. Tzeng

  • American society of clinical oncology position statement on obesity and cancer

    Jennifer A. Ligibel;Catherine M. Alfano;Kerry S. Courneya;Wendy Demark-Wahnefried

  • A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed.

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Yuanyuan Liang;David Pechter;Lee W. Jones

  • Early Breast Cancer Therapy and Cardiovascular Injury

    Lee W. Jones;Mark J. Haykowsky;Jonas J. Swartz;Pamela S. Douglas

  • Cardiopulmonary Function and Age-Related Decline Across the Breast Cancer Survivorship Continuum

    Lee W. Jones;Kerry S. Courneya;John R. Mackey;Hyman B. Muss

  • The Effects of Source Credibility and Message Framing on Exercise Intentions, Behaviors, and Attitudes: An Integration of the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Prospect Theory1

    Lee W. Jones;Robert C. Sinclair;Kerry S. Courneya

  • A randomized trial of exercise and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors.

    K. S. Courneya;C. M. Friedenreich;H. A. Quinney;A. L. A. Fields

  • Effects of an oncologist's recommendation to exercise on self-reported exercise behavior in newly diagnosed breast cancer survivors: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

    Lee W. Jones;Kerry S. Courneya;Adrian S. Fairey;John R. Mackey

  • Effects of presurgical exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness among patients undergoing thoracic surgery for malignant lung lesions.

    Lee W. Jones;Carolyn J. Peddle;Neil D. Eves;Mark J. Haykowsky

  • Exercise intolerance in cancer and the role of exercise therapy to reverse dysfunction

    Lee W Jones;Neil D Eves;Mark Haykowsky;Stephen J Freedland

  • Randomized controlled trial of exercise and blood immune function in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

    Adrian S. Fairey;Kerry S. Courneya;Catherine J. Field;Gordon J. Bell

  • Exercise Counseling and Programming Preferences of Cancer Survivors

    Lee W. Jones;Kerry S. Courneya

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerry S. Courneya
Kerry S. Courneya University of Alberta
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried University of Alabama at Birmingham
John R. Mackey
John R. Mackey University of Alberta
James E. Herndon
James E. Herndon Duke University
Mark J. Haykowsky
Mark J. Haykowsky University of Alberta
Javid Moslehi
Javid Moslehi University of California, San Francisco
Mark W. Dewhirst
Mark W. Dewhirst Duke University
Jose G. Montoya
Jose G. Montoya Stanford University
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, there are several related online degrees and alternative career pathways that can broaden your opportunities in healthcare. For those interested in healthcare management rather than direct patient care, pursuing a degree in healthcare administration can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals and medical organizations.

Nurses looking to expand their scope of practice may want to explore adn to fnp bridge programs. These accelerated pathways allow registered nurses to become Family Nurse Practitioners and provide a greater degree of autonomy in clinical settings.

The field of nutrition and wellness is also growing rapidly. Those interested in combining health promotion with science might consider enrolling in an online bs in nutrition program, which can lead to roles in clinical nutrition, community health, or research.

For working adults balancing professional and personal commitments, identifying whats the best online mha program for working adults can help advance your career in healthcare administration without pausing your current job.

Best Scientists Citing Lee W. Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles