World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 54 4505 4376 2109 2034 555 13746

Carol Tenopir publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carol Tenopir between 1965 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carol Tenopir published across 62 years, from 1965 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2006. 1 of the 668 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2006. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 11 publications 1984: 11 publications 1985: 14 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 16 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 15 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 42 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1965 2026

668 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carol Tenopir: publications per year, 1965 to 2026
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 3
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 5
1983 11
1984 11
1985 14
1986 12
1987 10
1988 16
1989 13
1990 13
1991 15
1992 14
1993 18
1994 12
1995 15
1996 13
1997 17
1998 20
1999 19
2000 19
2001 20
2002 21
2003 22
2004 33
2005 17
2006 42
2007 24
2008 25
2009 19
2010 22
2011 18
2012 13
2013 12
2014 21
2015 19
2016 13
2017 17
2018 3
2019 9
2020 4
2021 5
2022 3
2023 12
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 668
Download as CSV

Carol Tenopir publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol Tenopir sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 552–561 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 555 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38 555
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Carol Tenopir D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol Tenopir sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 54
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Carol Tenopir is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Decision Sciences, with significant contributions in subfields such as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Information Systems; Information Systems and Management; Sociology and Political Science; and General Health Professions.

The main topics of Carol Tenopir's work include:

  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Data Quality and Management
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Conferences and Exhibitions Management

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Carol Tenopir include:

  • "Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide" (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians" (2020), published in PubMed
  • "The pandemic and changes in early career researchers' career prospects, research and publishing practices" (2023), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Attitudes of North American Academics toward Open Access Scholarly Journals" (2020), published in portal Libraries and the Academy
  • "The impact of the pandemic on early career researchers: what we already know from the internationally published literature" (2021), published in El Profesional de la Informacion

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Carol Tenopir are:

  • Suzie Allard
  • David Nicholas
  • Hamid R. Jamali
  • David Sims
  • Eti Herman

They publish frequently in the following venues:

  • El Profesional de la Informacion
  • Learned Publishing
  • PLoS ONE
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • PubMed

Carol Tenopir was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions

    Carol Tenopir;Suzie Allard;Kimberly L Douglass;Arsev Umur Aydinoglu

  • The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future

    Ian Rowlands;David Nicholas;Peter Williams;Paul Huntington

  • Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies

    Carol Tenopir

  • Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide

    Carol Tenopir;Elizabeth D. Dalton;Suzie Allard;Mike Frame

  • Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach

    Peiling Wang;William B. Hawk;Carol Tenopir

  • Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King;Sheri Edwards;Lei Wu

  • Communication Patterns of Engineers

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King

  • Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers,,,,

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King

  • Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians

    Carol Tenopir;Robert J. Sandusky;Suzie Allard;Ben Birch

  • Peer review: still king in the digital age

    David Nicholas;Anthony Watkinson;Hamid R. Jamali;Eti Herman

  • Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide.

    Carol Tenopir;Natalie M. Rice;Suzie Allard;Lynn Baird

  • Academic libraries and research data services: Current practices and plans for the future

    Carol Tenopir;Ben Birch;Suzie Allard

  • Patterns of Journal Use by Scientists Through Three Evolutionary Phases

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King;Peter Boyce;Peter Boyce;Matt Grayson

  • Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists.

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King;Amy Bush

  • Research data services in European academic research libraries

    Carol Tenopir;Sanna Talja;Wolfram Horstmann;Elina Late

  • Participatory design of DataONE—Enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences

    William K. Michener;Suzie Allard;Amber Budden;Robert B. Cook

  • Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database

    Diane Nahl;Carol Tenopir

  • Using and Reading Scholarly Literature.

    Donald W. King;Carol Tenopir

  • Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King;Peter B. Boyce;Matt Grayson

  • Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference?

    Carol Tenopir;Donald W. King;Jesse Spencer;Lei Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

David Nicholas
David Nicholas CIBER Research
Hamid R. Jamali
Hamid R. Jamali Charles Sturt University
Paul Huntington
Paul Huntington University College London
Bo-Christer Björk
Bo-Christer Björk Hanken School of Economics
Eric M. Meyers
Eric M. Meyers University of British Columbia
Andrew Dillon
Andrew Dillon The University of Texas at Austin
Ian Rowlands
Ian Rowlands University College London
Nicolai Czink
Nicolai Czink Stanford University
Robert B. Cook
Robert B. Cook Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Barrie Gunter
Barrie Gunter University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths—and online education is making this field more accessible than ever. If you’re looking to enter the tech industry quickly, an online associates degree program can help you build foundational skills in as little as six months. These fast-track options are ideal for those eager to start working or continue toward a bachelor’s degree.

Many students pursue online degrees from online universities to benefit from maximum flexibility and affordability. For those interested in merging technology with management or entrepreneurship, consider a business degree focused on information systems or analytics.

For hands-on, technical roles in areas like infrastructure or manufacturing, a cheapest online engineering degree can provide specialized training at a lower tuition cost. By exploring these related pathways, students can tailor their education to match career goals and take advantage of the growing job market in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Carol Tenopir

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles