World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 33 9373 9014 459 451 95 5427

Hamid R. Jamali publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hamid R. Jamali between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hamid R. Jamali published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 24 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications
2001 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hamid R. Jamali: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 6
2007 13
2008 11
2009 4
2010 9
2011 7
2012 1
2013 4
2014 6
2015 14
2016 6
2017 3
2018 6
2019 2
2020 12
2021 6
2022 17
2023 15
2024 10
2025 14
Total 171
Download as CSV

Hamid R. Jamali publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid R. Jamali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259 95
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Hamid R. Jamali D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid R. Jamali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189 33
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Hamid R. Jamali is affiliated with Charles Sturt University in Australia. Their research contributes primarily to the field of Social Sciences, with notable subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems and Management.

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Web and Library Services
  • Research Data Management Practices

Hamid R. Jamali has published extensively across multiple journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Learned Publishing
  • Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
  • El Profesional de la Informacion
  • Scientometrics
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Recent papers by Jamali include:

  • "The pandemic and changes in early career researchers' career prospects, research and publishing practices," 2023, PLoS ONE
  • "Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate?" 2021, System
  • "'Steady Ships' in the COVID-19 Crisis: Australian Public Library Responses to the Pandemic," 2021, Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
  • "Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks," 2020, Computers & Education
  • "A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers," 2020, Learned Publishing

Jamali has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • David Nicholas
  • Eti Herman
  • Abdullah Abrizah
  • Blanca Rodríguez Bravo
  • Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri

Best Publications

  • The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future

    Ian Rowlands;David Nicholas;Peter Williams;Paul Huntington

  • Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations

    Hamid R. Jamali;Mahsa Nikzad

  • What do faculty and students really think about e‐books?

    Ian Rowlands;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali;Paul Huntington

  • Peer review: still king in the digital age

    David Nicholas;Anthony Watkinson;Hamid R. Jamali;Eti Herman

  • Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles

    Hamid R. Jamali

  • UK scholarly e‐book usage: a landmark survey

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;David J. Clark;Paul Huntington

  • Using ICT with people with special education needs: what the literature tells us

    Peter Williams;Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks

    Delneshin Danaei;Hamid R. Jamali;Yazdan Mansourian;Hassan Rastegarpour

  • E-textbook use, information seeking behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Anthony Watkinson

  • Student digital information‐seeking behaviour in context

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Ian Rowlands

  • The use and users of scholarly e‐journals: a review of log analysis studies

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas;Paul Huntington

  • Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment: The full‐text download and what can be read into it

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Ian Rowlands

  • Researchers' e-journal use and information seeking behaviour

    David Nicholas;Peter Williams;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas;Eti Herman

  • Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields

    Hamid R. Jamali;Majid Nabavi

  • Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire

    Carol Tenopir;Kenneth Levine;Suzie Allard;Lisa Christian

  • Information‐seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Evaluating information seeking and use in the changing virtual world: the emerging role of Google Analytics

    David J. Clark;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Spotlight on the 'bouncer'

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Tom Dobrowolski

  • Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Finding Information in (Very Large) Digital Libraries: A Deep Log Approach to Determining Differences in Use According to Method of Access

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Carol Tenopir

  • Online use and information seeking behaviour

    David Nicholas;David Clark;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Diversity in the e‐journal use and information‐seeking behaviour of UK researchers

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Article decay in the digital environment: An analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods

    Paul Huntington;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali;Carol Tenopir

  • Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust

    Anthony Watkinson;David Nicholas;Clare Thornley;Eti Herman

Frequent Co-Authors

David Nicholas
David Nicholas CIBER Research
Paul Huntington
Paul Huntington University College London
Ian Rowlands
Ian Rowlands University College London
Carol Tenopir
Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jie Xu
Jie Xu Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Barrie Gunter
Barrie Gunter University of Leicester
Lutz Bornmann
Lutz Bornmann Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Xiaofang Zhou
Xiaofang Zhou Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of engineering and technology in the USA is rapidly evolving, offering students a range of exciting online degrees and career pathways. As digital transformation intensifies, professionals with up-to-date skills are highly sought after by employers across industries.

For those interested in user-focused technology, a ui ux design bachelor's degree online stands out as a flexible option for students looking to master digital design and user experience. Meanwhile, those who excel at leading teams and managing complex projects may wonder, is project management a good degree? The answer is yes, as project managers play a critical role in technology-driven environments.

Emerging technologies are also shaping new career paths. Obtaining a degree in cryptocurrency can prepare students for opportunities in blockchain, fintech, and secure online transactions—fields that are only projected to expand. Finally, students interested in the business and management side of athletics can fast-track their education with a sports management degree online, entering an industry that intersects technology, analytics, and event coordination.

Best Scientists Citing Hamid R. Jamali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles