World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
33
Citations
5427
World Ranking
9373
National Ranking
459

Hamid R. Jamali publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid R. Jamali sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Hamid R. Jamali D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hamid R. Jamali sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hamid R. Jamali is affiliated with Charles Sturt University in Australia. Their research contributes primarily to the field of Social Sciences, with notable subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems and Management.

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Web and Library Services
  • Research Data Management Practices

Hamid R. Jamali has published extensively across multiple journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Learned Publishing
  • Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
  • El Profesional de la Informacion
  • Scientometrics
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Recent papers by Jamali include:

  • "The pandemic and changes in early career researchers' career prospects, research and publishing practices," 2023, PLoS ONE
  • "Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate?" 2021, System
  • "'Steady Ships' in the COVID-19 Crisis: Australian Public Library Responses to the Pandemic," 2021, Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
  • "Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks," 2020, Computers & Education
  • "A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers," 2020, Learned Publishing

Jamali has collaborated frequently with a group of co-authors, including:

  • David Nicholas
  • Eti Herman
  • Abdullah Abrizah
  • Blanca Rodríguez Bravo
  • Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri

Best Publications

  • The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future

    Ian Rowlands;David Nicholas;Peter Williams;Paul Huntington

  • Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations

    Hamid R. Jamali;Mahsa Nikzad

  • What do faculty and students really think about e‐books?

    Ian Rowlands;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali;Paul Huntington

  • Peer review: still king in the digital age

    David Nicholas;Anthony Watkinson;Hamid R. Jamali;Eti Herman

  • Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles

    Hamid R. Jamali

  • UK scholarly e‐book usage: a landmark survey

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;David J. Clark;Paul Huntington

  • Using ICT with people with special education needs: what the literature tells us

    Peter Williams;Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks

    Delneshin Danaei;Hamid R. Jamali;Yazdan Mansourian;Hassan Rastegarpour

  • E-textbook use, information seeking behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Anthony Watkinson

  • Student digital information‐seeking behaviour in context

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Ian Rowlands

  • The use and users of scholarly e‐journals: a review of log analysis studies

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas;Paul Huntington

  • Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment: The full‐text download and what can be read into it

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Ian Rowlands

  • Researchers' e-journal use and information seeking behaviour

    David Nicholas;Peter Williams;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas;Eti Herman

  • Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields

    Hamid R. Jamali;Majid Nabavi

  • Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire

    Carol Tenopir;Kenneth Levine;Suzie Allard;Lisa Christian

  • Information‐seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Evaluating information seeking and use in the changing virtual world: the emerging role of Google Analytics

    David J. Clark;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Spotlight on the 'bouncer'

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Tom Dobrowolski

  • Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists

    Hamid R. Jamali;David Nicholas

  • Finding Information in (Very Large) Digital Libraries: A Deep Log Approach to Determining Differences in Use According to Method of Access

    David Nicholas;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali;Carol Tenopir

  • Online use and information seeking behaviour

    David Nicholas;David Clark;Ian Rowlands;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Diversity in the e‐journal use and information‐seeking behaviour of UK researchers

    David Nicholas;Ian Rowlands;Paul Huntington;Hamid R. Jamali

  • Article decay in the digital environment: An analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods

    Paul Huntington;David Nicholas;Hamid R. Jamali;Carol Tenopir

  • Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust

    Anthony Watkinson;David Nicholas;Clare Thornley;Eti Herman

Frequent Co-Authors

David Nicholas
David Nicholas CIBER Research
Paul Huntington
Paul Huntington University College London
Ian Rowlands
Ian Rowlands University College London
Carol Tenopir
Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jie Xu
Jie Xu Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Barrie Gunter
Barrie Gunter University of Leicester
Lutz Bornmann
Lutz Bornmann Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
Xiaofang Zhou
Xiaofang Zhou Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of engineering and technology in the USA is rapidly evolving, offering students a range of exciting online degrees and career pathways. As digital transformation intensifies, professionals with up-to-date skills are highly sought after by employers across industries.

For those interested in user-focused technology, a ui ux design bachelor's degree online stands out as a flexible option for students looking to master digital design and user experience. Meanwhile, those who excel at leading teams and managing complex projects may wonder, is project management a good degree? The answer is yes, as project managers play a critical role in technology-driven environments.

Emerging technologies are also shaping new career paths. Obtaining a degree in cryptocurrency can prepare students for opportunities in blockchain, fintech, and secure online transactions—fields that are only projected to expand. Finally, students interested in the business and management side of athletics can fast-track their education with a sports management degree online, entering an industry that intersects technology, analytics, and event coordination.

Best Scientists Citing Hamid R. Jamali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles