What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social science
- Statistics
- Management
His primary areas of study are Bibliometrics, Citation analysis, Citation, Citation impact and Library science.
His Bibliometrics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Field, Information retrieval, Data science and Operations research.
His Data science research incorporates elements of Science policy and Data collection.
His work deals with themes such as Quality and Scientific method, which intersect with Citation analysis.
His Citation impact research includes themes of Accounting and Field.
In general Library science study, his work on Journal Impact Factors often relates to the realm of Empirical data and Macro, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His most cited work include:
- Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (1022 citations)
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (463 citations)
- New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (418 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Citation, Citation analysis, Bibliometrics, Data science and Citation impact.
In his study, Management science is strongly linked to Operations research, which falls under the umbrella field of Citation.
His Citation analysis research includes elements of Quality, Scientific method, Data collection and Journal Impact Factors.
His Bibliometrics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Social science, Scientometrics, Science Citation Index and Regional science.
His studies deal with areas such as Ontology, Field, Data management and Process as well as Data science.
Henk F. Moed performs multidisciplinary studies into Citation impact and Scopus in his work.
He most often published in these fields:
- Citation (26.38%)
- Citation analysis (25.77%)
- Bibliometrics (22.70%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Informetrics (8.59%)
- Research assessment (5.52%)
- Citation (26.38%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Informetrics, Research assessment, Citation, Library science and Scopus.
The various areas that Henk F. Moed examines in his Informetrics study include Engineering ethics, Mathematical economics, Citation analysis, Scholarship and Value.
Henk F. Moed interconnects Science studies, Bibliometrics, Openness to experience and Competence in the investigation of issues within Citation analysis.
Henk F. Moed has researched Bibliometrics in several fields, including Social science, Scientific productivity and Demographic economics.
His studies in Citation integrate themes in fields like Discipline and Unit of analysis.
His work on Scientometrics as part of general Library science study is frequently linked to Index and Global model, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (109 citations)
- A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings (68 citations)
- Applied Evaluative Informetrics (45 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social science
- Statistics
- Management
Henk F. Moed focuses on Web of science, Informetrics, Information retrieval, Discipline and Citation.
His study in Informetrics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Value and Mathematical economics.
His Information retrieval study combines topics in areas such as Reliability and Scope.
As part of his studies on Scope, Henk F. Moed often connects relevant subjects like Quality.
His Quality research includes elements of Bibliometrics, Search engine indexing, Knowledge management and Altmetrics.
Henk F. Moed combines subjects such as Scientific communication, Unit of analysis and Identification with his study of Discipline.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
