D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Social Sciences and Humanities
Italy
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Computer Science D-index 50 Citations 12,554 87 World Ranking 2825 National Ranking 57
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 53 Citations 11,777 111 World Ranking 999 National Ranking 7

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Italy Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

His primary areas of study are Bibliometrics, Citation analysis, Citation, Citation impact and Library science. His Bibliometrics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Field, Information retrieval, Data science and Operations research. His Data science research incorporates elements of Science policy and Data collection.

His work deals with themes such as Quality and Scientific method, which intersect with Citation analysis. His Citation impact research includes themes of Accounting and Field. In general Library science study, his work on Journal Impact Factors often relates to the realm of Empirical data and Macro, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His most cited work include:

  • Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (1022 citations)
  • Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (463 citations)
  • New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (418 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Citation, Citation analysis, Bibliometrics, Data science and Citation impact. In his study, Management science is strongly linked to Operations research, which falls under the umbrella field of Citation. His Citation analysis research includes elements of Quality, Scientific method, Data collection and Journal Impact Factors.

His Bibliometrics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Social science, Scientometrics, Science Citation Index and Regional science. His studies deal with areas such as Ontology, Field, Data management and Process as well as Data science. Henk F. Moed performs multidisciplinary studies into Citation impact and Scopus in his work.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Citation (26.38%)
  • Citation analysis (25.77%)
  • Bibliometrics (22.70%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Informetrics (8.59%)
  • Research assessment (5.52%)
  • Citation (26.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Informetrics, Research assessment, Citation, Library science and Scopus. The various areas that Henk F. Moed examines in his Informetrics study include Engineering ethics, Mathematical economics, Citation analysis, Scholarship and Value. Henk F. Moed interconnects Science studies, Bibliometrics, Openness to experience and Competence in the investigation of issues within Citation analysis.

Henk F. Moed has researched Bibliometrics in several fields, including Social science, Scientific productivity and Demographic economics. His studies in Citation integrate themes in fields like Discipline and Unit of analysis. His work on Scientometrics as part of general Library science study is frequently linked to Index and Global model, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (109 citations)
  • A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings (68 citations)
  • Applied Evaluative Informetrics (45 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

Henk F. Moed focuses on Web of science, Informetrics, Information retrieval, Discipline and Citation. His study in Informetrics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Value and Mathematical economics. His Information retrieval study combines topics in areas such as Reliability and Scope.

As part of his studies on Scope, Henk F. Moed often connects relevant subjects like Quality. His Quality research includes elements of Bibliometrics, Search engine indexing, Knowledge management and Altmetrics. Henk F. Moed combines subjects such as Scientific communication, Unit of analysis and Identification with his study of Discipline.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation

Henk F. Moed.
(1899)

2053 Citations

Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals

Henk F. Moed.
Journal of Informetrics (2010)

720 Citations

Journal impact measures in bibliometric research

Wolfgang Glänzel;Henk F. Moed.
Scientometrics (2002)

644 Citations

New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications

Henk F. Moed;R. E. De Bruin;Thed N. van Leeuwen.
Scientometrics (1995)

629 Citations

The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance

H.F. Moed;W.J.M. Burger;J.G. Frankfort;A.F.J. Van Raan.
Research Policy (1985)

575 Citations

Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects

Robert R. Braam;Henk F. Moed;Anthony F. J. van Raan.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (1991)

507 Citations

Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance

Thed N. Van Leeuwen;Henk F. Moed;Robert J. W. Tijssen;Martijn S. Visser.
Scientometrics (2001)

504 Citations

Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems

Henk F. Moed;Wolfgang Glänzel;Ulrich Schmoch.
(2004)

415 Citations

The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits

Henk F. Moed.
Nature (2002)

414 Citations

Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research

Henk F. Moed;Wolfgang Glänzel;Ulrich Schmoch.
(2005)

386 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Henk F. Moed

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 166

Lutz Bornmann

Lutz Bornmann

Max Planck Society

Publications: 143

Giovanni Abramo

Giovanni Abramo

National Research Council (CNR)

Publications: 131

Mike Thelwall

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton

Publications: 125

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

University of Rome Tor Vergata

Publications: 110

Wolfgang Glänzel

Wolfgang Glänzel

KU Leuven

Publications: 101

Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

University of Montreal

Publications: 100

Rodrigo Costas

Rodrigo Costas

Leiden University

Publications: 65

Thed N. van Leeuwen

Thed N. van Leeuwen

Leiden University

Publications: 63

Félix de Moya-Anegón

Félix de Moya-Anegón

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 60

Ronald Rousseau

Ronald Rousseau

KU Leuven

Publications: 60

Ludo Waltman

Ludo Waltman

Leiden University

Publications: 52

Anthony F. J. van Raan

Anthony F. J. van Raan

Leiden University

Publications: 42

Nees Jan van Eck

Nees Jan van Eck

Leiden University

Publications: 41

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Indiana University

Publications: 36

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans-Dieter Daniel

ETH Zurich

Publications: 36

Trending Scientists

John C. Crittenden

John C. Crittenden

Georgia Institute of Technology

Qin Xin

Qin Xin

Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics

Bernard-Pierre Roques

Bernard-Pierre Roques

Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale

Michael R. Knowles

Michael R. Knowles

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Ken W. Krauss

Ken W. Krauss

United States Geological Survey

Pål Axel Olsson

Pål Axel Olsson

Lund University

Alan Peterkofsky

Alan Peterkofsky

National Institutes of Health

Federico V. Pallardó

Federico V. Pallardó

University of Valencia

Jan G. Hengstler

Jan G. Hengstler

TU Dortmund University

Michel Magnin

Michel Magnin

Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale

Robert F. Asarnow

Robert F. Asarnow

University of California, Los Angeles

Rolf W. Günther

Rolf W. Günther

Charité - University Medicine Berlin

Giuseppe Argenziano

Giuseppe Argenziano

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

Andrew C. Wicks

Andrew C. Wicks

University of Virginia

Something went wrong. Please try again later.