World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2025
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 66 967 7 180 19392
Computer Science 66 2319 37 163 18119

Henk F. Moed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henk F. Moed between 1985 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henk F. Moed published across 37 years, from 1985 to 2021, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 19 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications
1985 2021

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henk F. Moed: publications per year, 1985 to 2021
Year Publications
1985 4
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 6
1992 0
1993 5
1994 0
1995 5
1996 5
1997 0
1998 6
1999 8
2000 2
2001 4
2002 7
2003 2
2004 4
2005 8
2006 7
2007 5
2008 8
2009 8
2010 6
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 6
2015 8
2016 8
2017 20
2018 9
2019 7
2020 10
2021 9
Total 200
Download as CSV

Henk F. Moed publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk F. Moed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 180 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 180
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Henk F. Moed D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk F. Moed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68 66
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Henk F. Moed was affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spanned various topics primarily within the field of Decision Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work addressed multiple main topics such as:

  • scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Academic Publishing and Open Access

Henk F. Moed published frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • Scientometrics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Informetrics
  • Scholarly Assessment Reports
  • Journal of Data and Information Science

Recent publications by Moed included:

  • "Appropriate Use of Metrics in Research Assessment of Autonomous Academic Institutions," 2020, Scholarly Assessment Reports

Other notable recent papers, authored by Moed's frequent collaborators, focused on topics related to scientometrics and research assessment, for example:

  • "Does corresponding authorship influence scientific impact in collaboration: Brazilian institutions as a case of study," 2020, Scientometrics
  • "The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries," 2021, Journal of Informetrics
  • "National orientation of Ukrainian journals: means-ends decoupling in a semi-peripheral state," 2021, Scientometrics
  • "Studying the heterogeneity of European higher education institutions," 2020, Scientometrics

Prominent co-authors frequently collaborating with Moed included:

  • Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote
  • Félix de Moya Anegón
  • Carmen López-Illescas
  • Myroslava Hladchenko
  • Giuseppe Catalano

Best Publications

  • Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation

    Henk F. Moed

  • Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals

    Henk F. Moed

  • Journal impact measures in bibliometric research

    Wolfgang Glänzel;Henk F. Moed

  • New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications

    Henk F. Moed;R. E. De Bruin;Thed N. van Leeuwen

  • The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance

    H.F. Moed;W.J.M. Burger;J.G. Frankfort;A.F.J. Van Raan

  • Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research

    Henk F. Moed;Wolfgang Glänzel;Ulrich Schmoch

  • Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance

    Thed N. Van Leeuwen;Henk F. Moed;Robert J. W. Tijssen;Martijn S. Visser

  • Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects

    Robert R. Braam;Henk F. Moed;Anthony F. J. van Raan

  • New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation

    Henk F. Moed

  • Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature

    Gali Halevi;Henk F. Moed;Judit Bar-Ilan

  • Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems

    Henk F. Moed;Wolfgang Glänzel;Ulrich Schmoch

  • The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits

    Henk F. Moed

  • Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study

    E. C. M. Noyons;H. F. Moed;M. Luwel

  • Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects

    Robert R. Braam;Henk F. Moed;Anthony F. J. van Raan

  • Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors

    H. F. Moed;Th. N. Van Leeuwen

  • The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence

    Thed N. Van Leeuwen;Martijn S. Visser;Henk F. Moed;T. O. N. J. Nederhof

  • Impact factors can mislead.

    H. F. Moed;Th. N. van Leeuwen

  • Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping

    E. C. M. Noyons;H. F. Moed;A. F. J. Van Raan

  • The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section

    Henk F. Moed

  • UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?

    Henk F. Moed

  • Studying scientific migration in Scopus

    Henk F. Moed;M'Hamed Aisati;Andrew Plume

  • The Use of Bibliometric Data for the Measurement of University Research Performance : Research Policy

    H F Moed;W J M Burger;J G Frankfort;A F J van Raan

Frequent Co-Authors

Cinzia Daraio
Cinzia Daraio Sapienza University of Rome
Thed N. van Leeuwen
Thed N. van Leeuwen Leiden University
Félix de Moya-Anegón
Félix de Moya-Anegón Spanish National Research Council
Jan Reedijk
Jan Reedijk Leiden University
Andrea Bonaccorsi
Andrea Bonaccorsi University of Pisa
Maurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini Sapienza University of Rome
Judit Bar-Ilan
Judit Bar-Ilan Bar-Ilan University
Anthony F. J. van Raan
Anthony F. J. van Raan Leiden University
Giancarlo Ruocco
Giancarlo Ruocco Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a world of possibilities, especially for those seeking flexibility or affordability. Whether your interests lie in psychology, counseling, or social work, a variety of online programs can match your career aspirations and timeline.

If budget is a concern, consider looking into the cheapest online degree in psychology, which can make entry into this important field more accessible. For those drawn to mental health counseling, there are lmft programs that can be completed efficiently, opening doors to roles as licensed marriage and family therapists.

Social work is another impactful pathway. You can find online msw options that are less competitive, providing broader access to those passionate about making a difference in communities. For students eager to pursue advanced clinical roles, there are numerous psyd online programs designed to prepare graduates for licensing and practice as professional psychologists.

Choosing the right online program depends on your goals, budget, and desired career outcomes. Explore these flexible options to find the best pathway for your future in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Henk F. Moed

Recently Published Articles