D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Computer Science D-index 47 Citations 26,274 87 World Ranking 3232 National Ranking 35

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning

His primary scientific interests are in Data science, Information retrieval, Citation, Bibliographic coupling and Data mining. Citation network and Text mining is closely connected to Visualization in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Data science. His research on Information retrieval often connects related areas such as Citation analysis.

His work deals with themes such as Social science and Sociology of scientific knowledge, which intersect with Citation. His study focuses on the intersection of Bibliographic coupling and fields such as Construct with connections in the field of Focus and Fractional counting. His Co-citation research incorporates elements of Science mapping and Representation.

His most cited work include:

  • Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. (2494 citations)
  • Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. (2494 citations)
  • Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (781 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Ludo Waltman mostly deals with Citation, Information retrieval, Data science, Citation impact and Data mining. Ludo Waltman interconnects Actuarial science and Cluster analysis in the investigation of issues within Citation. His Information retrieval research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Bibliographic coupling and Similarity.

Ludo Waltman has included themes like Visualization and Scientometrics in his Data science study. In Data mining, Ludo Waltman works on issues like Normalization, which are connected to Fractional counting. His work carried out in the field of Citation analysis brings together such families of science as Bibliometrics and Econometrics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Citation (27.56%)
  • Information retrieval (20.00%)
  • Data science (15.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Citation (27.56%)
  • Information retrieval (20.00%)
  • Skewness (2.67%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ludo Waltman focuses on Citation, Information retrieval, Skewness, Psychology and Relevance. His Citation network study in the realm of Citation connects with subjects such as Tracing, Mathematical properties and Formal description. His Information retrieval research includes elements of Strengths and weaknesses and Pairwise comparison.

His Skewness research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Actuarial science and San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. His work investigates the relationship between San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment and topics such as Value that intersect with problems in Focus and Econometrics. His research on Relevance frequently links to adjacent areas such as Subject.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A scientometric overview of CORD-19 (23 citations)
  • A principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications (14 citations)
  • Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. (12 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning

His primary areas of investigation include Scopus, Web of science, Information retrieval, Citation and Social media. Multidisciplinary approach, Scale, World Wide Web, Scientific literature and Strengths and weaknesses are fields of study that overlap with his Scopus research. His Web of science studies intersect with other subjects such as Pairwise comparison and Document type definition.

His Information retrieval research incorporates themes from Similarity, Bibliographic coupling and Cluster analysis. Much of his study explores Citation relationship to Measure. His studies link Relevance with Social media.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.

Nees Jan van Eck;Nees Jan van Eck;Ludo Waltman;Ludo Waltman.
Scientometrics (2010)

3945 Citations

Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

Diana Hicks;Paul Wouters;Ludo Waltman;Sarah de Rijcke.
Nature (2015)

1547 Citations

The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

Diana Hicks;Paul Wouters;Ludo Waltman;Sarah de Rijcke Ismael Rafols.
Nature (2015)

1438 Citations

Visualizing Bibliometric Networks

Nees Jan van Eck;Ludo Waltman.
(2014)

954 Citations

A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks

Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan van Eck;Ed C.M. Noyons.
Journal of Informetrics (2010)

889 Citations

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

Ludo Waltman.
Journal of Informetrics (2016)

660 Citations

From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities

Vincent Traag;Ludo Waltman;Nees Jan van Eck.
arXiv: Social and Information Networks (2018)

546 Citations

From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities.

V. A. Traag;L. Waltman;N. J. van Eck.
Scientific Reports (2019)

523 Citations

How to normalize cooccurrence dataq An analysis of some well-known similarity measures

Nees Jan van Eck;Ludo Waltman.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2009)

515 Citations

A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS

Nees Jan van Eck;Ludo Waltman;Rommert Dekker;Jan van den Berg.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2010)

465 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Ludo Waltman

Lutz Bornmann

Lutz Bornmann

Max Planck Society

Publications: 257

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 182

Mike Thelwall

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton

Publications: 105

José M. Merigó

José M. Merigó

University of Technology Sydney

Publications: 94

Rodrigo Costas

Rodrigo Costas

Leiden University

Publications: 88

Ismael Rafols

Ismael Rafols

Leiden University

Publications: 65

Ronald Rousseau

Ronald Rousseau

KU Leuven

Publications: 62

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

University of Rome Tor Vergata

Publications: 61

Giovanni Abramo

Giovanni Abramo

National Research Council (CNR)

Publications: 56

Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

University of Montreal

Publications: 50

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Indiana University

Publications: 30

Genserik Reniers

Genserik Reniers

Delft University of Technology

Publications: 28

Alan L. Porter

Alan L. Porter

Georgia Institute of Technology

Publications: 28

Atanas G. Atanasov

Atanas G. Atanasov

Medical University of Vienna

Publications: 27

Thed N. van Leeuwen

Thed N. van Leeuwen

Leiden University

Publications: 26

Enrique Herrera-Viedma

Enrique Herrera-Viedma

University of Granada

Publications: 26

Trending Scientists

Anant Madabhushi

Anant Madabhushi

Case Western Reserve University

Fabio A. González

Fabio A. González

National University of Colombia

Lionel Fontagné

Lionel Fontagné

Université Paris Cité

Robert Y. M. Huang

Robert Y. M. Huang

University of Waterloo

Ana Denicola

Ana Denicola

University of the Republic

Dmitri I. Svergun

Dmitri I. Svergun

European Bioinformatics Institute

Jagdish Narayan

Jagdish Narayan

North Carolina State University

Raman Sukumar

Raman Sukumar

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

George Aggelis

George Aggelis

University of Patras

Christoph Wittmann

Christoph Wittmann

Saarland University

Michael S. Donnenberg

Michael S. Donnenberg

Virginia Commonwealth University

Ole Bennike

Ole Bennike

Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland

Timothy R. Rebbeck

Timothy R. Rebbeck

Harvard University

Howard N. Hodis

Howard N. Hodis

University of Southern California

Karin Haustermans

Karin Haustermans

KU Leuven

Eric Esarey

Eric Esarey

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Something went wrong. Please try again later.