World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
64
Citations
14147
World Ranking
1665
National Ranking
36

Genserik Reniers publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genserik Reniers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 494 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Genserik Reniers D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genserik Reniers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Genserik Reniers is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on safety and risk management within engineering and health-related disciplines. Their work is distributed across several interconnected fields including Decision Sciences, Engineering, and Health Professions, with substantial publication counts reflecting active engagement in these areas.

The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Radiological and Ultrasound Technology; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality; Aerospace Engineering; and Chemical Health and Safety. These diverse areas underscore a broad competence in both theoretical and applied aspects of safety and risk analysis.

The main research topics explored by Genserik Reniers include:

  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Chemical Safety and Risk Management
  • Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Genserik Reniers has published a number of papers in key journals relevant to safety science and process industries. Recent notable publications include:

  • Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS (2020) - Journal of Cleaner Production
  • An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework (2020) - Safety Science
  • A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries (2020) - Safety Science
  • Chemical industry in China: The current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development (2020) - Safety Science
  • Predicting and analyzing injury severity: A machine learning-based approach using class-imbalanced proactive and reactive data (2020) - Safety Science

Their frequent co-authors include Ming Yang, Chao Chen, Nima Khakzad, Floris Goerlandt, and Shuaiqi Yuan, highlighting sustained collaborative networks in the field.

Publication venues where the scientist has consistently contributed research are:

  • Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Safety Science
  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Genserik Reniers has also contributed to book literature, with works published in the Springer series in reliability engineering. One such book is titled Integrating Safety and Security Management to Protect Chemical Industrial Areas from Domino Effects, published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research

    Karolien van Nunen;Jie Li;Jie Li;Jie Li;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Koen Ponnet

  • Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment

    Nicola Paltrinieri;Louise Comfort;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers

  • A review of optimisation models for pedestrian evacuation and design problems

    Hendrik Vermuyten;Jeroen Beliën;Liesje De Boeck;Genserik Reniers

  • Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation : A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS

    Chao Chen;Chao Chen;Changjun Li;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Fuqiang Yang;Fuqiang Yang

  • Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN)

    Esmaeil Zarei;Nima Khakzad;Valerio Cozzani;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework

    Jie Li;Jie Li;Floris Goerlandt;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management

    Faisal Khan;Seyed Javad Hashemi;Nicola Paltrinieri;Paul Amyotte

  • Domino effects in the process industries : modelling, prevention and managing

    Genserik Reniers;Valerio Cozzani

  • Process safety indicators, a review of literature

    Paul Swuste;Jos Theunissen;Peter Schmitz;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Statistical analysis the characteristics of extraordinarily severe coal mine accidents (ESCMAs) in China from 1950 to 2018

    Jinjia Zhang;Kaili Xu;Genserik Reniers;Greg You

  • Development of a CSR model for practice : connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business

    Stefan Maas;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim

    Genserik L L Reniers;W. Dullaert;B. J.M. Ale;K. Soudan

  • How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting

    Terje Aven;Genserik L. L. Reniers;Genserik L. L. Reniers

  • Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis: A review

    Floris Goerlandt;Floris Goerlandt;Nima Khakzad;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams

    Floris Goerlandt;Floris Goerlandt;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects

    Nima Khakzad;Gabriele Landucci;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Using graph theory to analyze the vulnerability of process plants in the context of cascading effects

    Nima Khakzad;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Integrating safety and security resources to protect chemical industrial parks from man-made domino effects: A dynamic graph approach

    Chao Chen;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Nima Khakzad

  • A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries

    Chao Chen;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Nima Khakzad

  • Chemical industry in China : The current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development

    Chao Chen;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP)

    Hans Pasman;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Work safety in China’s Thirteenth Five-Year plan period (2016–2020): Current status, new challenges and future tasks

    Bing Wang;Chao Wu;Liangguo Kang;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

Frequent Co-Authors

Nima Khakzad
Nima Khakzad Toronto Metropolitan University
Valerio Cozzani
Valerio Cozzani University of Bologna
Wout Dullaert
Wout Dullaert Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Koen Ponnet
Koen Ponnet Ghent University
Gabriele Landucci
Gabriele Landucci University of Pisa
Floris Goerlandt
Floris Goerlandt Dalhousie University
Kenneth Sörensen
Kenneth Sörensen University of Antwerp
Faisal Khan
Faisal Khan Texas A&M University
Paul Amyotte
Paul Amyotte Dalhousie University
Frank Witlox
Frank Witlox Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Genserik Reniers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles