World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 64 1665 1581 36 33 494 14147

Genserik Reniers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Genserik Reniers between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Genserik Reniers published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 27.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2018. 29 of the 637 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2018. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 58 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 63 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 58 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 9 publications
2003 2025

637 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Genserik Reniers: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 6
2006 5
2007 12
2008 11
2009 21
2010 36
2011 15
2012 19
2013 58
2014 18
2015 25
2016 35
2017 55
2018 63
2019 44
2020 58
2021 56
2022 50
2023 18
2024 20
2025 9
Total 637
Download as CSV

Genserik Reniers publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genserik Reniers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 488–497 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 494 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29 494
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Genserik Reniers D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Genserik Reniers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118 64
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Genserik Reniers is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on safety and risk management within engineering and health-related disciplines. Their work is distributed across several interconnected fields including Decision Sciences, Engineering, and Health Professions, with substantial publication counts reflecting active engagement in these areas.

The scientist has contributed extensively to subfields such as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Radiological and Ultrasound Technology; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality; Aerospace Engineering; and Chemical Health and Safety. These diverse areas underscore a broad competence in both theoretical and applied aspects of safety and risk analysis.

The main research topics explored by Genserik Reniers include:

  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Chemical Safety and Risk Management
  • Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Genserik Reniers has published a number of papers in key journals relevant to safety science and process industries. Recent notable publications include:

  • Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS (2020) - Journal of Cleaner Production
  • An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework (2020) - Safety Science
  • A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries (2020) - Safety Science
  • Chemical industry in China: The current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development (2020) - Safety Science
  • Predicting and analyzing injury severity: A machine learning-based approach using class-imbalanced proactive and reactive data (2020) - Safety Science

Their frequent co-authors include Ming Yang, Chao Chen, Nima Khakzad, Floris Goerlandt, and Shuaiqi Yuan, highlighting sustained collaborative networks in the field.

Publication venues where the scientist has consistently contributed research are:

  • Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Safety Science
  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Genserik Reniers has also contributed to book literature, with works published in the Springer series in reliability engineering. One such book is titled Integrating Safety and Security Management to Protect Chemical Industrial Areas from Domino Effects, published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research

    Karolien van Nunen;Jie Li;Jie Li;Jie Li;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Koen Ponnet

  • Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment

    Nicola Paltrinieri;Louise Comfort;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers;G.L.L.M.E. Reniers

  • A review of optimisation models for pedestrian evacuation and design problems

    Hendrik Vermuyten;Jeroen Beliën;Liesje De Boeck;Genserik Reniers

  • Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation : A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS

    Chao Chen;Chao Chen;Changjun Li;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Fuqiang Yang;Fuqiang Yang

  • Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN)

    Esmaeil Zarei;Nima Khakzad;Valerio Cozzani;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: Methods, tools, and framework

    Jie Li;Jie Li;Floris Goerlandt;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management

    Faisal Khan;Seyed Javad Hashemi;Nicola Paltrinieri;Paul Amyotte

  • Domino effects in the process industries : modelling, prevention and managing

    Genserik Reniers;Valerio Cozzani

  • Process safety indicators, a review of literature

    Paul Swuste;Jos Theunissen;Peter Schmitz;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Development of a CSR model for practice : connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business

    Stefan Maas;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim

    Genserik L L Reniers;W. Dullaert;B. J.M. Ale;K. Soudan

  • How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting

    Terje Aven;Genserik L. L. Reniers;Genserik L. L. Reniers

  • Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis: A review

    Floris Goerlandt;Floris Goerlandt;Nima Khakzad;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams

    Floris Goerlandt;Floris Goerlandt;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects

    Nima Khakzad;Gabriele Landucci;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Using graph theory to analyze the vulnerability of process plants in the context of cascading effects

    Nima Khakzad;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Integrating safety and security resources to protect chemical industrial parks from man-made domino effects: A dynamic graph approach

    Chao Chen;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Nima Khakzad

  • Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP)

    Hans Pasman;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Work safety in China’s Thirteenth Five-Year plan period (2016–2020): Current status, new challenges and future tasks

    Bing Wang;Chao Wu;Liangguo Kang;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

Frequent Co-Authors

Nima Khakzad
Nima Khakzad Toronto Metropolitan University
Valerio Cozzani
Valerio Cozzani University of Bologna
Wout Dullaert
Wout Dullaert Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Koen Ponnet
Koen Ponnet Ghent University
Gabriele Landucci
Gabriele Landucci University of Pisa
Floris Goerlandt
Floris Goerlandt Dalhousie University
Kenneth Sörensen
Kenneth Sörensen University of Antwerp
Faisal Khan
Faisal Khan Texas A&M University
Paul Amyotte
Paul Amyotte Dalhousie University
Frank Witlox
Frank Witlox Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Genserik Reniers

Trending Scientists