World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Valerio Cozzani

Valerio Cozzani

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
77
Citations
18479
World Ranking
674
National Ranking
13

Valerio Cozzani publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerio Cozzani sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 530 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Valerio Cozzani D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerio Cozzani sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Valerio Cozzani is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Decision Sciences, with extensive contributions in various subfields such as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Aerospace Engineering; Radiological and Ultrasound Technology; Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality; and Control and Systems Engineering.

Their scientific work covers several main topics including:

  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Fire Dynamics and Safety Research
  • Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Key recent publications by Valerio Cozzani include:

  • "Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: Comparison among LNG and diesel technologies," 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "A comprehensive analysis of the occurrence of Natech events in the process industry," 2021, Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • "Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning," 2020, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • "Wireless Sensor Networks for Detection and Localization of Subsea Oil Leakages," 2021, IEEE Sensors Journal
  • "Analysis of Cybersecurity-related Incidents in the Process Industry," 2021, Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Valerio Cozzani frequently publishes in high-impact venues, including:

  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Pisa)
  • Journal of Cleaner Production

Collaborations form a significant part of Cozzani's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Alessandro Tugnoli
  • Giordano Emrys Scarponi
  • Alessio Misuri
  • Matteo Iaiani
  • Gabriele Landucci

Best Publications

  • The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis.

    Valerio Cozzani;Gianfilippo Gubinelli;Giacomo Antonioni;Gigliola Spadoni

  • Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events

    Valerio Cozzani;Gianfilippo Gubinelli;Ernesto Salzano

  • Heat of wood pyrolysis

    Johannes Rath;Martin Wolfinger;Gerhard Steiner;Gernot Krammer

  • The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire

    Gabriele Landucci;Gianfilippo Gubinelli;Giacomo Antonioni;Valerio Cozzani

  • Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry

    Valeria Villa;Nicola Paltrinieri;Nicola Paltrinieri;Faisal Khan;Valerio Cozzani

  • The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models.

    Valerio Cozzani;Ernesto Salzano

  • Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks.

    Nima Khakzad;Faisal Khan;Paul Amyotte;Valerio Cozzani

  • Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: Analysis of past accidents

    Valerio Cozzani;Michela Campedel;Elisabetta Renni;Elisabetta Renni;Elisabeth Krausmann

  • Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN)

    Esmaeil Zarei;Nima Khakzad;Valerio Cozzani;Genserik Reniers;Genserik Reniers

  • Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis

    Elisabeth Krausmann;Elisabetta Renni;Elisabetta Renni;Michela Campedel;Valerio Cozzani

  • Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire

    Gabriele Landucci;Francesca Argenti;Alessandro Tugnoli;Valerio Cozzani

  • A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events.

    Giacomo Antonioni;Gigliola Spadoni;Valerio Cozzani

  • Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas

    Valerio Cozzani;Giacomo Antonioni;Gabriele Landucci;Alessandro Tugnoli

  • Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management

    Faisal Khan;Seyed Javad Hashemi;Nicola Paltrinieri;Paul Amyotte

  • Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area

    Giacomo Antonioni;Gigliola Spadoni;Valerio Cozzani

  • Domino effects in the process industries : modelling, prevention and managing

    Genserik Reniers;Valerio Cozzani

  • Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool

    Valerio Cozzani;Giacomo Antonioni;Gigliola Spadoni

  • Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design.

    Valerio Cozzani;Alessandro Tugnoli;Ernesto Salzano

  • Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events

    Giacomo Antonioni;Sarah Bonvicini;Gigliola Spadoni;Valerio Cozzani

  • Devolatilization and pyrolysis of refuse derived fuels: characterization and kinetic modelling by a thermogravimetric and calorimetric approach

    Valerio Cozzani;Luigi Petarca;Leonardo Tognotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Landucci
Gabriele Landucci University of Pisa
Genserik Reniers
Genserik Reniers Delft University of Technology
Ernesto Salzano
Ernesto Salzano University of Bologna
Faisal Khan
Faisal Khan Texas A&M University
Nima Khakzad
Nima Khakzad Toronto Metropolitan University
Paul Amyotte
Paul Amyotte Dalhousie University
Carlo Alberto Nucci
Carlo Alberto Nucci University of Bologna
Alberto Borghetti
Alberto Borghetti University of Bologna
Ibrahim Dincer
Ibrahim Dincer University of Ontario Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA offers various flexible pathways, especially for those balancing studies with other responsibilities. Many students, including parents, are considering best degrees for moms going back to school to help manage family and professional goals while advancing their education.

Online degrees provide opportunities for faster graduation and convenience. If you’re aiming to earn your degree quickly, some schools provide college classes online that can be completed in as little as six weeks, allowing for accelerated learning without sacrificing quality.

For those interested in related fields, there are options such as the accelerated finance degree and advanced programs like an accelerated mba programs usa. These programs are designed for busy learners who want to enhance their career prospects in less time.

Flexible online pathways make it easier than ever to upskill and move into engineering, technology, or related business roles, no matter your lifestyle or schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Valerio Cozzani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles