World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
39860
World Ranking
10340
National Ranking
5317

Diana L. Miglioretti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana L. Miglioretti sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 390 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Diana L. Miglioretti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana L. Miglioretti sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Diana L. Miglioretti is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields including Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cancer Research.

The main topics of their research work encompass:

  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging

Among their frequent co-authors are Karla Kerlikowske, Brian L. Sprague, Louise M. Henderson, Anna N.A. Tosteson, and Tracy Onega, indicating collaborations on a variety of research projects within their areas of study.

Miglioretti has published extensively in several venues, including:

  • UNC Libraries
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Radiology
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology

Some recent papers authored by Miglioretti include:

  • "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Mortality in the US: Estimates From Collaborative Simulation Modeling" (2021) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • "Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density" (2020) in JAMA Network Open
  • "Projected Lifetime Cancer Risks From Current Computed Tomography Imaging" (2025) in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Changes in Mammography Use by Women's Characteristics During the First 5 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • "Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for Women With ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants" (2022) in JAMA Oncology

Diana L. Miglioretti was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Jafi Lipson;Ralph Marcus;Kwang Pyo Kim

  • Association Between Obesity and Psychiatric Disorders in the US Adult Population

    Gregory E. Simon;Michael Von Korff;Kathleen Saunders;Diana L. Miglioretti;Diana L. Miglioretti

  • Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

    Patricia A. Carney;Diana L. Miglioretti;Bonnie C. Yankaskas;Karla Kerlikowske

  • The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk

    Diana L. Miglioretti;Diana L. Miglioretti;Eric Johnson;Andrew Williams;Robert T. Greenlee

  • Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. II. Event-related synchronization in the gamma band.

    Nathan E. Crone;Diana L. Miglioretti;Barry Gordon;Ronald P. Lesser

  • Use of Diagnostic Imaging Studies and Associated Radiation Exposure for Patients Enrolled in Large Integrated Health Care Systems, 1996-2010

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Diana L. Miglioretti;Eric Johnson;Choonsik Lee

  • Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. I. Alpha and beta event-related desynchronization.

    Nathan E. Crone;Diana L. Miglioretti;Barry Gordon;Jeffrey M. Sieracki

  • Chronic spinal pain and physical-mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication.

    Michael Von Korff;Paul Crane;Michael Lane;Diana L. Miglioretti

  • Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Karen J. Sherman;Daniel C. Cherkin;Janet Erro;Diana L. Miglioretti

  • Rising Use Of Diagnostic Medical Imaging In A Large Integrated Health System

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Diana L. Miglioretti;Eric B. Larson

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection

    Constance D. Lehman;Robert D. Wellman;Diana S. M. Buist;Karla Kerlikowske

  • Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis

    R. Smith-Bindman;Chandra Aubin;J. Bailitz;R. N. Bengiamin

  • Risk Factors for Breast Cancer for Women Aged 40 to 49 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Heidi D. Nelson;Bernadette Zakher;Amy Cantor;Rongwei Fu

  • Latent Variable Regression for Multiple Discrete Outcomes

    Karen Bandeen-roche;Diana L. Miglioretti;Scott L. Zeger;Paul J. Rathouz

  • Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: A cohort study

    Rebecca A. Hubbard;Karla Kerlikowske;Chris I. Flowers;Bonnie C. Yankaskas

  • National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

    Constance D. Lehman;Robert F. Arao;Brian L. Sprague;Janie M. Lee

  • Trends in Use of Medical Imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Marilyn L Kwan;Emily C Marlow;Mary Kay Theis

  • Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Diana L Miglioretti;Nicole Lurie;Linn Abraham

  • Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States

    Brian L. Sprague;Ronald E. Gangnon;Veronica Burt;Amy Trentham-Dietz

  • Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Philip W. Chu;Diana L. Miglioretti;Edward A. Sickles

Frequent Co-Authors

Karla Kerlikowske
Karla Kerlikowske University of California, San Francisco
Diana S. M. Buist
Diana S. M. Buist Kaiser Permanente
Edward A. Sickles
Edward A. Sickles University of California, San Francisco
Joann G. Elmore
Joann G. Elmore University of California, Los Angeles
Robert D. Rosenberg
Robert D. Rosenberg Technical University of Munich
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University
Stephen H. Taplin
Stephen H. Taplin National Institutes of Health
Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Rachel Ballard-Barbash National Institutes of Health
Carolyn M. Rutter
Carolyn M. Rutter RAND Corporation
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens new doors for those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medicine. Many students are considering dnp programs to quickly advance in nursing leadership roles or clinical specialties.

If you’re interested in starting your career sooner, fast track medical options, such as accelerated LPN programs, can help you enter the workforce in less time than conventional pathways.

There’s also growing demand for mental health professionals. The fastest psych np program pathways prepare nurses for specialized roles supporting mental and emotional well-being, often through flexible online study.

For those leaning toward healthcare administration, the best online mha programs offer affordability and convenience, equipping graduates to manage and lead healthcare organizations. These online options provide accessible routes into rewarding healthcare careers, catering to a wide range of interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Diana L. Miglioretti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles