World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin J. Yaffe

Martin J. Yaffe

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
41696
World Ranking
11120
National Ranking
446

Martin J. Yaffe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Yaffe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 479 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin J. Yaffe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Yaffe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Yaffe is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, contributing extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research encompasses multiple subfields, particularly focusing on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their work spans a variety of key cancer-related topics including Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, AI in cancer detection, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Cancer Risks and Factors.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations are James G. Mainprize, Etta D. Pisano, Alison Cheung, Jean M. Seely, and John M.S. Bartlett.

The scientist has published in several venues, with repeated contributions in:

  • Cancer Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Current Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Journal of Breast Imaging

Notable recent publications include:

  • "The impact of episodic screening interruption: COVID-19 and population-based cancer screening in Canada" (2020, Journal of Medical Screening)
  • "Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for Women With ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 Pathogenic Variants" (2022, JAMA Oncology)
  • "Identification of 31 loci for mammographic density phenotypes and their associations with breast cancer risk" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy" (2023, Abdominal Radiology)
  • "The randomized trial of mammography screening that was not-A cautionary tale" (2021, Journal of Medical Screening)

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

    Debbie Saslow;Carla Boetes;Wylie Burke;Steven Harms

  • Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer

    Norman F. Boyd;Helen Guo;Lisa J. Martin;Limei Sun

  • Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening

    Etta D. Pisano;Constantine Gatsonis;Edward Hendrick;Martin Yaffe

  • Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

    Ellen Warner;Donald B. Plewes;Kimberley A. Hill;Petrina A. Causer

  • Quantitative Classification of Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk: Results From the Canadian National Breast Screening Study

    N. F. Boyd;J. W. Byng;R. A. Jong;E. K. Fishell

  • Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.

    Norman F. Boyd;Gina A. Lockwood;Jeff W. Byng;David L. Tritchler

  • X-ray detectors for digital radiography

    M J Yaffe;J A Rowlands

  • Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

    Norman F Boyd;Gillian S Dite;Jennifer Stone;Anoma Gunasekara

  • The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities

    J W Byng;N F Boyd;E Fishell;R A Jong

  • Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer

    Norman F Boyd;Johanna M Rommens;Kelly Vogt;Vivian Lee

  • Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening

    Etta D. Pisano;Constantine Gatsonis;Edward Hendrick;Martin Yaffe

  • X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues.

    P C Johns;M J Yaffe

  • Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects

    Norman F Boyd;Norman F Boyd;Lisa J Martin;Lisa J Martin;Martin J Yaffe;Salomon Minkin

  • Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

    Etta D. Pisano;R. Edward Hendrick;Martin J. Yaffe;Janet K. Baum

  • Comparison of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, and Ultrasound for Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer

    E. Warner;D. B. Plewes;R. S. Shumak;G. C. Catzavelos

  • Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer

    Norman F. Boyd;Lisa J. Martin;Michael Bronskill;Martin J. Yaffe

  • Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis.

    Anthony B. Miller;Geoffrey R. Howe;Gregory J. Sherman;Joan P. Lindsay

  • Risk of Radiation-induced Breast Cancer from Mammographic Screening

    Martin J. Yaffe;James G. Mainprize

  • Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

    Curtis B. Caldwell;Sandra J. Stapleton;David W. Holdsworth;Roberta Jong

  • Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging

    Ellen Warner;Kimberley Hill;Petrina Causer;Donald Plewes

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman F. Boyd
Norman F. Boyd Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Lisa J. Martin
Lisa J. Martin Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Steven A. Narod
Steven A. Narod University of Toronto
Aaron Fenster
Aaron Fenster University of Western Ontario
Constantine Gatsonis
Constantine Gatsonis Brown University
Robert M. Nishikawa
Robert M. Nishikawa University of Pittsburgh
John L. Hopper
John L. Hopper University of Melbourne
Gina Lockwood
Gina Lockwood Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
Giske Ursin
Giske Ursin University of Oslo
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and health-focused career paths. For those interested in direct patient care but seeking a flexible admission process, there are nursing school that don't require teas, making it easier to enter the nursing field without standardized testing barriers.

If you’re looking to move quickly into healthcare leadership, you can fast-track your career with accelerated healthcare programs available online. These programs are designed for busy professionals and can help you earn your degree in less time.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement can benefit from adn to fnp bridge programs, creating a direct pathway from Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner—often with flexible online study options.

For those passionate about preventive care and wellness, an online nutritionist degree can lead to rewarding careers in community health, sports nutrition, or clinical environments.

No matter your background or interests, these educational pathways can help you build a meaningful healthcare career with the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Yaffe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles