Her primary areas of investigation include Breast cancer, Radiology, Mammography, Cancer and Biopsy. Her Breast cancer research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Carcinoma in situ, Oncology and Receiver operating characteristic. Her Radiology research incorporates elements of Malignancy, Nuclear medicine and Breast MRI.
The concepts of her Mammography study are interwoven with issues in Prospective cohort study, Cohort study and Mass screening. Her Cancer research includes themes of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Surgery, Disease and Primary breast cancer.
Constance D. Lehman mainly investigates Breast cancer, Radiology, Mammography, Biopsy and Breast MRI. Constance D. Lehman interconnects Gynecology and Oncology in the investigation of issues within Breast cancer. Her research in Radiology is mostly concerned with Magnetic resonance imaging.
Constance D. Lehman combines subjects such as Medical physics, Family medicine and Obstetrics with her study of Mammography. Constance D. Lehman works mostly in the field of Biopsy, limiting it down to topics relating to Breast biopsy and, in certain cases, Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Her Cancer research incorporates themes from Disease and Mass screening.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Breast cancer, Mammography, Radiology, Cancer and Breast MRI. The various areas that Constance D. Lehman examines in her Breast cancer study include Obstetrics, Logistic regression, Odds ratio and Confidence interval. Her Mammography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cross-sectional study and Family medicine.
Her primary area of study in Radiology is in the field of Biopsy. The study incorporates disciplines such as Stage and Medical diagnosis in addition to Cancer. Her work is dedicated to discovering how Breast MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging are connected with Mastectomy and other disciplines.
Her primary areas of study are Breast cancer, Radiology, Breast MRI, Mammography and Retrospective cohort study. Her Breast cancer research is under the purview of Cancer. Her Radiology research integrates issues from Ductal carcinoma, Cancer detection, Breast-conserving surgery and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Her study in Breast MRI is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Magnetic resonance imaging and Cancer risk. Her studies examine the connections between Mammography and genetics, as well as such issues in Family medicine, with regards to Screening mammography and Mammography screening. She combines subjects such as Biopsy, Nuclear medicine, Cohort and Confidence interval with her study of Retrospective cohort study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography
Debbie Saslow;Carla Boetes;Wylie Burke;Steven Harms.
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (2007)
Screening for Breast Cancer
Joann G. Elmore;Katrina Armstrong;Constance D. Lehman;Suzanne W. Fletcher.
JAMA (2005)
MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer
Constance D. Lehman;Constantine Gatsonis;Christiane K. Kuhl;R. Edward Hendrick.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2007)
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study
Mitchell D. Schnall;Jeffrey Blume;David A. Bluemke;Gia A. DeAngelis.
Radiology (2006)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
David A. Bluemke;Constantine A. Gatsonis;Mei Hsiu Chen;Gia A. DeAngelis.
JAMA (2004)
Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Constance D. Lehman;Jeffrey D. Blume;Paul Weatherall;David Thickman.
Cancer (2005)
Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.
Constance D. Lehman;Claudine Isaacs;Mitchell D. Schnall;Etta D. Pisano.
Radiology (2007)
Pathologic Complete Response Predicts Recurrence-Free Survival More Effectively by Cancer Subset: Results From the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657
Laura J. Esserman;Donald A. Berry;Angela DeMichele;Lisa Carey.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (2012)
Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.
Robert D. Rosenberg;Bonnie C. Yankaskas;Linn A. Abraham;Edward A. Sickles.
Radiology (2006)
Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years
Diana S. M. Buist;Peggy L. Porter;Constance Lehman;Stephen H. Taplin.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2004)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
University of Pennsylvania
University of California, San Francisco
University of California, Davis
Brown University
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
University of Pennsylvania
MIT
University of California, San Francisco
National Institutes of Health
Dartmouth College
University of Chicago
University of Auckland
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
University of California, Davis
Kyoto University
Spanish National Research Council
Chang Gung University
South Dakota State University
Cranfield University
Seoul National University
University of Birmingham
University of California, San Francisco
University of Manchester
University of Cape Town
Wake Forest University
University of Virginia