World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
28160
World Ranking
15019
National Ranking
7595

Joann G. Elmore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joann G. Elmore sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 399 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joann G. Elmore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joann G. Elmore sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Joann G. Elmore is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable subfields including Oncology, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics, reflecting a broad engagement with medical and technological challenges. These include:

  • AI in cancer detection
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Radiology practices and education

Joann G. Elmore has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues, including:

  • UNC Libraries
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • PLoS ONE
  • JAMA Dermatology

The scientist has collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, among them:

  • Michael Gottlieb
  • Kathleen F. Kerr
  • Erica S. Spatz
  • Arjun K. Venkatesh
  • Stevan R. Knezevich

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Joann G. Elmore include:

  • Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Words Matter: What Do Patients Find Judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient Notes?, 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Severe Fatigue and Persistent Symptoms at 3 Months Following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infections During the Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Time Periods: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study, 2023, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Revision of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis Classification Schema for Melanocytic Lesions, 2023, JAMA Network Open

Joann G. Elmore holds membership in professional organizations, including being a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Release from Prison — A High Risk of Death for Former Inmates

    Ingrid A. Binswanger;Marc F. Stern;Richard A. Deyo;Patrick J. Heagerty

  • Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

    Joann G. Elmore;Mary B. Barton;Victoria M. Moceri;Sarah Polk

  • Screening for Breast Cancer

    Joann G. Elmore;Katrina Armstrong;Constance D. Lehman;Suzanne W. Fletcher

  • Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead

    Tom Delbanco;Jan Walker;Sigall K. Bell;Jonathan D. Darer

  • Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of Mammograms

    Joann G. Elmore;Carolyn K. Wells;Carol H. Lee;Debra H. Howard

  • Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

    Joshua J. Fenton;Stephen H. Taplin;Patricia A. Carney;Linn Abraham

  • Diagnostic Concordance Among Pathologists Interpreting Breast Biopsy Specimens

    Joann G. Elmore;Gary M. Longton;Patricia A. Carney;Berta M. Geller

  • Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer

    Suzanne W. Fletcher;Joann G. Elmore

  • Pathologists’ diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study

    Joann G Elmore;Raymond L Barnhill;David E Elder;Gary M Longton

  • Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use

    Tarak K. Trivedi;Tarak K. Trivedi;Charles Liu;Anna Liza M. Antonio;Natasha Wheaton

  • Gender differences in chronic medical, psychiatric, and substance-dependence disorders among jail inmates.

    Ingrid A. Binswanger;Joseph O. Merrill;Patrick M. Krueger;Mary C. White

  • The Efficacy of Silver Alloy-Coated Urinary Catheters in Preventing Urinary Tract Infection: A Meta-Analysis

    S. Saint;J.G. Elmore;S.D. Sullivan;S.S. Emerson

  • Epidemiologia, bioestatística e medicina preventiva

    James F Jekel;David L Katz;Joann G Elmore

  • Efficacy of Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Cancer Research Network Project

    Lisa J. Herrinton;William E. Barlow;Onchee Yu;Ann M. Geiger

  • Hormone Replacement Therapy After a Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Relation to Recurrence and Mortality

    Ellen S. O’Meara;Mary Anne Rossing;Janet R. Daling;Joann G. Elmore

  • Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

    William E. Barlow;Chen Chi;Patricia A. Carney;Stephen H. Taplin

  • Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists’ Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

    Joann G. Elmore;Sara L. Jackson;Linn Abraham;Diana L. Miglioretti;Diana L. Miglioretti

  • Open notes: doctors and patients signing on.

    Tom Delbanco;Jan Walker;Jonathan D. Darer;Joann G. Elmore

  • Predicting the Cumulative Risk of False-Positive Mammograms

    Cindy L. Christiansen;Fei Wang;Mary B. Barton;William Kreuter

  • Urological Survey: Abstracts: Urinary Tract InfectionThe Efficacy of Silver Alloy-Coated Urinary Catheters in Preventing Urinary Tract Infection: A Meta-Analysis

    S. Saint;J.G. Elmore;S.D. Sullivan;S.S. Emerson

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana L. Miglioretti
Diana L. Miglioretti University of California, Davis
David E. Elder
David E. Elder Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University
Stephen H. Taplin
Stephen H. Taplin National Institutes of Health
Linda G. Shapiro
Linda G. Shapiro University of Washington
Suzanne G. Leveille
Suzanne G. Leveille University of Massachusetts Boston
William E. Barlow
William E. Barlow Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Anna N. A. Tosteson
Anna N. A. Tosteson Dartmouth College
Edward A. Sickles
Edward A. Sickles University of California, San Francisco
Diana S. M. Buist
Diana S. M. Buist Kaiser Permanente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or healthcare careers in the USA, online programs offer increased flexibility and several accelerated options. Those who already hold a nursing degree may consider accelerated dnp programs online to quickly advance into leadership roles or specialized practice areas. These programs are ideal for working professionals aiming to become Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) holders in the shortest time possible.

Affordability is also a key factor to consider. If cost is a primary concern, finding the cheapest dnp program can significantly reduce the financial burden of advancing your nursing education. Entry-level students may want to start with lpn online programs, which are designed to help you become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time than traditional pathways.

For those with a master’s degree in nursing who want to specialize further, the fastest post master's pmhnp programs prepare you for roles in psychiatric and mental health—an area with growing need. Exploring these online pathways can help you find the right fit for your career goals, timeline, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Joann G. Elmore

Trending Scientists