World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
25142
World Ranking
15618
National Ranking
7864

Overview

Edward A. Sickles is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with an emphasis on Oncology and Radiology.

Their work spans several subfields including:

  • Oncology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Edward A. Sickles' research addresses a range of topics such as:

  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research

Selected recent papers coauthored or associated with Edward A. Sickles include:

  • Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database, 2020, Radiology
  • Performance of screening MRI in high risk patients at initial versus subsequent screen, 2020, Clinical Imaging
  • Prevalent vs Incident Screen: Why Does It Matter?, 2024, Journal of Breast Imaging
  • Establishing a Gold Standard for Test Sets. Variation in Interpretive Agreement of Expert Mammographers, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Contents, 2020, Clinical Imaging

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Berta M. Geller
  • Patricia A. Carney
  • Bonnie C. Yankaskas
  • Diana L. Miglioretti
  • Karla Kerlikowske

Edward A. Sickles has published extensively in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Clinical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Journal of Breast Imaging

Best Publications

  • Breast Cancer Screening With Imaging: Recommendations From the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the Use of Mammography, Breast MRI, Breast Ultrasound, and Other Technologies for the Detection of Clinically Occult Breast Cancer

    Carol H. Lee;D. David Dershaw;Daniel Kopans;Phil Evans

  • Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography

    Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady;John Barclay;Edward A. Sickles

  • Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.

    Linda J. Warren Burhenne;Susan A. Wood;Carl J. D'Orsi;Stephen A. Feig

  • Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.

    E A Sickles

  • Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

    Joshua J. Fenton;Stephen H. Taplin;Patricia A. Carney;Linn Abraham

  • Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR

    Debra L. Monticciolo;Mary S. Newell;Linda Moy;Bethany Niell

  • Mammographic Characteristics of 115 Missed Cancers Later Detected with Screening Mammography and the Potential Utility of Computer-aided Detection

    Robyn L. Birdwell;Debra M. Ikeda;Kathryn F. O’Shaughnessy;Edward A. Sickles

  • Positive Predictive Value of Screening Mammography by Age and Family History of Breast Cancer

    Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady;John Barclay;Edward A. Sickles

  • Clinical presentation of infection in granulocytopenic patients.

    Edward A. Sickles;William H. Greene;Peter H. Wiernik

  • Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

    Laura Esserman;Nola Hylton;Leila Yassa;John Barclay

  • Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

    A B Miller;C J Baines;E A Sickles

  • Variability and Accuracy in Mammographic Interpretation Using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System

    Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady;John Barclay;Steven D. Frankel

  • Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Philip W. Chu;Diana L. Miglioretti;Edward A. Sickles

  • Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.

    Robert D. Rosenberg;Bonnie C. Yankaskas;Linn A. Abraham;Edward A. Sickles

  • The ACR BI-RADS® Experience: Learning From History

    Elizabeth S. Burnside;Edward A. Sickles;Lawrence W. Bassett;Daniel L. Rubin

  • Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers

    Sickles Ea

  • Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation.

    E A Sickles

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States: A Cohort Study

    Karla Kerlikowske;Rebecca A. Hubbard;Diana L. Miglioretti;Berta M. Geller

  • Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General Radiologists

    Edward A. Sickles;Dulcy E. Wolverton;Katherine E. Dee

  • Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening

    Linda J. Warren Burhenne;Susan A. Wood;Stephen A. Feig;Daniel B. Kopans

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana L. Miglioretti
Diana L. Miglioretti University of California, Davis
Karla Kerlikowske
Karla Kerlikowske University of California, San Francisco
Robert D. Rosenberg
Robert D. Rosenberg Technical University of Munich
Joann G. Elmore
Joann G. Elmore University of California, Los Angeles
Diana S. M. Buist
Diana S. M. Buist Kaiser Permanente
Cindy Lee
Cindy Lee Stony Brook University
Daniel B. Kopans
Daniel B. Kopans Harvard University
Stephen H. Taplin
Stephen H. Taplin National Institutes of Health
William E. Barlow
William E. Barlow Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Rachel Ballard-Barbash National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following a single pathway. Many accessible online degree options can help you enter or advance in the healthcare field. For example, those interested in a support role might consider online medical billing and coding with financial aid to start building a medical career quickly and affordably.

Prospective nurses facing entrance exam challenges may be relieved to know there are reputable nursing schools that don't require teas test, streamlining admission for aspiring RNs. For those looking to move into leadership, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online opens doors to management roles in hospitals, clinics, and communities.

Finally, registered nurses considering career advancement can benefit from rn to np bridge program options that make it easier to become a nurse practitioner without starting from scratch. These options let you tailor your educational journey to your goals, schedule, and budget while keeping healthcare careers within reach.

Best Scientists Citing Edward A. Sickles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles