World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
22026
World Ranking
980
National Ranking
527

Heang Ping Chan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heang Ping Chan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 482 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Heang Ping Chan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heang Ping Chan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heang Ping Chan is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Computer Science. Within these broad areas, they work extensively in subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, and Health Informatics.

Their scientific contributions address numerous topics, particularly in medical imaging and artificial intelligence. Key subjects in their work are:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Heang Ping Chan has published research in several prominent venues, including the following frequent publication sites:

  • Medical Physics
  • Medical Imaging 2020: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Tomography
  • BJR|Artificial Intelligence
  • Cancers

Among their recent papers are notable works such as:

  • "Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis," 2020, published in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
  • "Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI," 2022, published in Nature Medicine
  • "Computer-aided diagnosis in the era of deep learning," 2020, published in Medical Physics
  • "AAPM task group report 273: Recommendations on best practices for AI and machine learning for computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging," 2022, published in Medical Physics
  • "Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets," 2020, published in Tomography

Their collaborative work involves coauthors frequently engaged in related research areas. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Lubomir M. Hadjiiski
  • Ravi K. Samala
  • Chuan Zhou
  • Mark A. Helvie
  • Richard H. Cohan

Heang Ping Chan's body of work has a significant focus on artificial intelligence applications in medical imaging, addressing issues in cancer detection, imaging techniques, and clinical decision support systems. The combination of their expertise in both medicine and computer science allows for interdisciplinary approaches to advancing medical technologies and diagnostic accuracy.

Best Publications

  • Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

    Heang-Ping Chan;Ravi K. Samala;Lubomir M. Hadjiiski;Chuan Zhou

  • Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography

    Heang Ping Chan;Kunio Doi;Simranjit Galhotra;Carl J. Vyborny

  • Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images

    B. Sahiner;Heang-Ping Chan;N. Petrick;Datong Wei

  • Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis.

    H P Chan;K Doi;C J Vyborny;R A Schmidt

  • Lung nodule detection on thoracic computed tomography images: Preliminary evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system

    Metin N. Gurcan;Berkman Sahiner;Nicholas Petrick;Heang Ping Chan

  • Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

    Maryellen L. Giger;Heang Ping Chan;John M Boone

  • Artificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognition

    Shih-Chung B. Lo;Heang-Ping Chan;Jyh-Shyan Lin;Huai Li

  • A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis

    Yiheng Zhang;Heang Ping Chan;Berkman Sahiner;Jun Wei

  • Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.

    Heang-Ping Chan;Berkman Sahiner;Mark A. Helvie;Nicholas Petrick

  • Computer-aided diagnosis in the era of deep learning.

    Heang-Ping Chan;Lubomir M Hadjiiski;Ravi K Samala

  • An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection

    N. Petrick;Heang-Ping Chan;B. Sahiner;Datong Wei

  • Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space

    Heang-Ping Chan;Datong Wei;Mark A. Helvie;Berkman Sahiner

  • Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces

    Heang Ping Chan;Berkman Sahiner;Kwok Leung Lam;Nicholas Petrick

  • Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: segmentation and classification using 3D active contours.

    Ted W. Way;Lubomir M. Hadjiiski;Berkman Sahiner;Heang Ping Chan

  • Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: The rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis

    Berkman Sahiner;Heang Ping Chan;Nicholas Petrick;Mark A. Helvie

  • Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: Pattern recognition with an artificial neural network

    Heang Ping Chan;Shih Chung B. Lo;Berkman Sahiner;Kwok Leung Lam

  • Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study.

    Heang Ping Chan;Kunio Doi;Carl J. Vyborny;Kwok Leung Lam

  • Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography

    Ravi K. Samala;Heang Ping Chan;Lubomir Hadjiiski;Mark A. Helvie

  • Urinary bladder segmentation in CT urography using deep-learning convolutional neural network and level sets

    Kenny H. Cha;Lubomir Hadjiiski;Ravi K. Samala;Heang Ping Chan

  • Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.

    Chuan Zhou;Heang-Ping Chan;Nicholas Petrick;Mark A. Helvie

  • Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation measures and morphological features

    Berkman Sahiner;Heang-Ping Chan;Nicholas Petrick;Mark A. Helvie

Frequent Co-Authors

Lubomir M. Hadjiiski
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Berkman Sahiner
Berkman Sahiner United States Food and Drug Administration
Mark A. Helvie
Mark A. Helvie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nicholas Petrick
Nicholas Petrick US Food and Drug Administration
Kunio Doi
Kunio Doi University of Chicago
Ella A. Kazerooni
Ella A. Kazerooni University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charles E. Metz
Charles E. Metz University of Chicago
Paul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Metin N. Gurcan
Metin N. Gurcan Wake Forest University
Maryellen L. Giger
Maryellen L. Giger University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students and professionals are choosing accelerated programs such as an most affordable online mba programs to enhance their business and tech leadership skills without breaking the bank.

If you're interested in advancing your expertise quickly, consider enrolling in an online masters degree. These programs offer a flexible and efficient way to gain specialized knowledge, often in just 12 months.

For those looking for a faster route to a rewarding tech career, there are several short careers that pay well. These credentials can prepare you for in-demand roles like cybersecurity analyst or data specialist in less time.

Ambitious students interested in cutting-edge fields may want to explore the best ai masters programs online. An advanced AI degree can open opportunities in research, automation, machine learning, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Heang Ping Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles