World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
5602
World Ranking
2366
National Ranking
997

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5567
World Ranking
10794
National Ranking
4495

James R. Lee publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Lee sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 116 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

James R. Lee D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Lee is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Mathematics and Computer Science. Their work spans several key topics such as stochastic processes and statistical mechanics, Markov chains and Monte Carlo methods, optimization and search problems, theoretical and computational physics, sparse and compressive sensing techniques, point processes and geometric inequalities, and advanced bandit algorithms research.

Lee's research output includes publications in a diverse range of venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • The Annals of Probability
  • SIAM Journal on Computing
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics

Among recent papers, the following stand out:

  • Conformal growth rates and spectral geometry on distributional limits of graphs, 2021, The Annals of Probability
  • Adversarial Hypothesis Testing and a Quantum Stein's Lemma for Restricted Measurements, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Metrical Task Systems on Trees via Mirror Descent and Unfair Gluing, 2021, SIAM Journal on Computing

Additionally, Lee has collaborated frequently with several researchers across multiple publications. These frequent co-authors are:

  • Farzam Ebrahimnejad
  • Sébastien Bubeck
  • Yin Tat Lee
  • Marah Abdin
  • Jyoti Aneja

Lee's work reflects a strong focus on mathematical physics and computational theory, with notable engagement in artificial intelligence and statistics and probability as subfields. The scientist's research often intersects applied mathematics and computational techniques, emphasizing foundational theoretical constructs.

Best Publications

  • Bounded geometries, fractals, and low-distortion embeddings

    A. Gupta;R. Krauthgamer;J.R. Lee

  • Improved Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Weight Vertex Separators

    Uriel Feige;MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi;James R. Lee

  • Navigating nets: simple algorithms for proximity search

    Robert Krauthgamer;James R. Lee

  • Multiway Spectral Partitioning and Higher-Order Cheeger Inequalities

    James R. Lee;Shayan Oveis Gharan;Luca Trevisan

  • Euclidean distortion and the sparsest cut

    Sanjeev Arora;James R. Lee;Assaf Naor

  • Lower Bounds on the Size of Semidefinite Programming Relaxations

    James R. Lee;Prasad Raghavendra;David Steurer

  • Extending Lipschitz functions via random metric partitions

    James R. Lee;Assaf Naor

  • Multi-way spectral partitioning and higher-order cheeger inequalities

    James R. Lee;Shayan Oveis Gharan;Luca Trevisan

  • Euclidean distortion and the sparsest cut

    Sanjeev Arora;James R. Lee;Assaf Naor

  • Improved approximation algorithms for minimum-weight vertex separators

    Uriel Feige;MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi;James R. Lee

  • Measured descent: a new embedding method for finite metrics

    R. Krauthgamer;J. R. Lee;M. Mendel;Assaf Naor

  • Embedding the diamond graph in Lp and dimension reduction in L1

    James R. Lee;Assaf Naor

  • Hardness of Approximation for Vertex-Connectivity Network Design Problems

    Guy Kortsarz;Robert Krauthgamer;James R. Lee

  • Cover times, blanket times, and majorizing measures

    Jian Ding;James R. Lee;Yuval Peres

  • Algorithms on negatively curved spaces

    Robert Krauthgamer;James Lee

  • Approximate Constraint Satisfaction Requires Large LP Relaxations

    Siu On Chan;James R. Lee;Prasad Raghavendra;David Steurer

  • Lp metrics on the Heisenberg group and the Goemans-Linial conjecture

    James Lee;Assaf Naor

  • An improved approximation ratio for the minimum linear arrangement problem

    Uriel Feige;James R. Lee

  • Trees and Markov Convexity

    James R. Lee;Assaf Naor;Yuval Peres

  • The black-box complexity of nearest-neighbor search

    Robert Krauthgamer;James R. Lee

  • k-server via multiscale entropic regularization

    Sébastien Bubeck;Michael B. Cohen;Yin Tat Lee;James R. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Assaf Naor
Assaf Naor Princeton University
Robert Krauthgamer
Robert Krauthgamer Weizmann Institute of Science
Prasad Raghavendra
Prasad Raghavendra University of California, Berkeley
Nathan Linial
Nathan Linial Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Venkatesan Guruswami
Venkatesan Guruswami University of California, Berkeley
David Steurer
David Steurer ETH Zurich
Alexander A. Razborov
Alexander A. Razborov University of Chicago
Sanjeev Arora
Sanjeev Arora Princeton University
Sébastien Bubeck
Sébastien Bubeck Microsoft (United States)
Yin Tat Lee
Yin Tat Lee Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various related fields that complement analytical and quantitative skills. Many students explore online programs to enhance their expertise and career prospects. For example, pursuing an easiest online mba program can help develop leadership and management skills, beneficial for mathematicians aiming for business roles.

For those interested in advanced research or consultancy, affordable options like the dba programs provide deeper business analytics and decision-making knowledge, complementing a math background effectively.

Another popular pathway is financial mathematics or quantitative finance. Earning an online masters in finance equips graduates with essential skills to work in banking, investment, or financial technology sectors, bridging math theory with real-world financial applications.

If time is a constraint, students may consider the fastest mba programs online. These accelerate career advancement by combining mathematical skills with business acumen in a shorter period.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles