World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
8125
World Ranking
8327
National Ranking
139

Yair Bartal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yair Bartal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 99 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yair Bartal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yair Bartal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yair Bartal is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and has a research profile concentrated in the field of Computer Science, particularly within computational theory and mathematics as well as computer vision and pattern recognition.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computational Mechanics

Several main topics emerge across their research publications, featuring:

  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Face and Expression Recognition
  • Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Digital Image Processing Techniques

Their recent papers include:

  • "Covering metric spaces by few trees," 2022, Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  • "Advances in Metric Ramsey Theory and its Applications," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Dimensionality Reduction for Practical Measures," 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Dimensionality Reduction for Practical Measures," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Online Probabilistic Metric Embedding: A General Framework for Bypassing Inherent Bounds," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors that have collaborated on multiple publications include:

  • Ora Nova Fandina
  • Kasper Green Larsen
  • Sandip Banerjee
  • Lee-Ad Gottlieb
  • Avi-Hai Hovav

Publication venues where this scientist often contributes are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Computer and System Sciences
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • Probabilistic approximation of metric spaces and its algorithmic applications

    Y. Bartal

  • On approximating arbitrary metrices by tree metrics

    Yair Bartal

  • Multiprocessor Scheduling with Rejection

    Yair Bartal;Stefano Leonardi;Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela;Jirí Sgall

  • On metric Ramsey-type phenomena

    Yair Bartal;Nathan Linial;Manor Mendel;Assaf Naor

  • Firmato: a novel firewall management toolkit

    Y. Bartal;A. Mayer;K. Nissim;A. Wool

  • New algorithms for an ancient scheduling problem

    Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat;Howard Karloff;Rakesh Vohra

  • Competitive algorithms for distributed data management

    Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat;Yuval Rabani

  • Incentive compatible multi unit combinatorial auctions

    Yair Bartal;Rica Gonen;Noam Nisan

  • Competitive distributed file allocation

    Baruch Awerbuch;Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat

  • Firmato: A novel firewall management toolkit

    Yair Bartal;Alain Mayer;Kobbi Nissim;Avishai Wool

  • Competitive non-preemptive call control

    Baruch Awerbuch;Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat;Adi Rosén

  • Distributed Paging for General Networks

    Baruch Awerbuch;Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat

  • The Traveling Salesman Problem: Low-Dimensionality Implies a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme

    Yair Bartal;Lee-Ad Gottlieb;Robert Krauthgamer

  • On-line generalized Steiner problem

    Baruch Awerbuch;Yossi Azar;Yair Bartal

  • Global optimization using local information with applications to flow control

    Y. Bartal;J.W. Byers;D. Raz

  • Method and system to manage firewall

    Yair Bartal;Alain Jules Mayer;Avishai Wool;ウール アヴィシャイ

  • Approximating min-sum k-clustering in metric spaces

    Yair Bartal;Moses Charikar;Danny Raz

  • Nearly Tight Low Stretch Spanning Trees

    I. Abraham;Y. Bartal;O. Neiman

  • A polylog(n)-competitive algorithm for metrical task systems

    Yair Bartal;Avrim Blum;Carl Burch;Andrew Tomkins

  • A better lower bound for on-line scheduling

    Yair Bartal;Howard Karloff;Yuval Rabani

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Leonardi
Stefano Leonardi Sapienza University of Rome
Amos Fiat
Amos Fiat Tel Aviv University
Baruch Awerbuch
Baruch Awerbuch Johns Hopkins University
Assaf Naor
Assaf Naor Princeton University
Nathan Linial
Nathan Linial Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Avishai Wool
Avishai Wool Tel Aviv University
Marek Chrobak
Marek Chrobak University of California, Riverside
Yossi Azar
Yossi Azar Tel Aviv University
Danny Raz
Danny Raz Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open many doors, but there are also a variety of quick degrees online that pay well if you want to enter the tech workforce quickly. These fast-track options can lead to high-earning roles in fields such as web development, cybersecurity, and data analysis.

For those interested in cutting-edge technology, online AI degree programs are rapidly gaining popularity. These programs provide a flexible path to careers in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation—sectors with strong job growth.

When considering what to study, it's helpful to review the best degrees based on job outlook and potential salary. Computer Science consistently ranks among the top, but related majors such as data science, information systems, and software engineering are also valuable.

If you're thinking about advancing your education easily, you can look into what's the easiest masters degree to get in technology or related fields. An easier, flexible graduate program can offer promotion opportunities and increase your earning potential while fitting your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Yair Bartal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles