World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
25706
World Ranking
2686
National Ranking
48

Amos Fiat publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Fiat sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amos Fiat D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Fiat sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award For ground-breaking contributions to broadcast encryption and piracy tracking, laying the foundations for modern copyright protection of blue-ray discs and other broadcast media.

Overview

Amos Fiat is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on decision sciences, economics, econometrics, finance, and computer science. Within these broad areas, the core subfields of their work include management science and operations research, economics and econometrics, computer networks and communications, information systems, and artificial intelligence.

Amos Fiat's research concentrates on a variety of topics that intersect economics and computer science, including auction theory and applications, game theory and voting systems, law, economics and judicial systems, optimization and search problems, cryptography and data security, as well as consumer market behavior and pricing.

Their publication record covers work in well-known academic venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Mathematics of Operations Research, and Artificial Intelligence. Some of their recent papers include:

  • Almost Full EFX Exists for Four Agents (2022), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • (Almost Full) EFX Exists for Four Agents (and Beyond) (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Combinatorial Auctions with Interdependent Valuations: SOS to the Rescue (2023), Mathematics of Operations Research
  • An α-regret analysis of Adversarial Bilateral Trade (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Competitive Equilibria with Unequal Budgets: Supporting Arbitrary Pareto Optimal Allocations (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)

Amos Fiat has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Michal Feldman, Alon Eden, Ben Berger, Avi Cohen, and Yossi Azar. These collaborations have resulted in multiple coauthored publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Their contributions have been recognized by awards such as the ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award in 2016, granted for work related to broadcast encryption and piracy tracking underlying copyright protection technologies for media formats like blue-ray discs.

Best Publications

  • How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems

    Amos Fiat;Adi Shamir

  • Untraceable Electronic Cash

    David Chaum;Amos Fiat;Moni Naor

  • Broadcast encryption

    Amos Fiat;Moni Naor

  • Zero-knowledge proofs of identity

    U. Feige;A. Fiat;A. Shamir

  • Tracing traitors

    B. Chor;A. Fiat;M. Naor;B. Pinkas

  • Tracing Traitors

    Benny Chor;Amos Fiat;Moni Naor

  • Competitive paging algorithms

    Amos Fiat;Richard M. Karp;Michael Luby;Lyle A. McGeoch

  • Online algorithms : The state of the art

    Amos Fiat;Gerhard J. Woeginger

  • Zero knowledge proofs of identity

    U. Fiege;A. Fiat;A. Shamir

  • Correlation clustering in general weighted graphs

    Erik D. Demaine;Dotan Emanuel;Amos Fiat;Nicole Immorlica

  • Spectral analysis of data

    Yossi Azar;Amos Fiat;Anna Karlin;Frank McSherry

  • Method, apparatus and article for identification and signature

    Adi Shamir;Amos Fiat

  • On-line routing of virtual circuits with applications to load balancing and machine scheduling

    James Aspnes;Yossi Azar;Amos Fiat;Serge Plotkin

  • Associative search in peer to peer networks: Harnessing latent semantics

    Edith Cohen;Amos Fiat;Haim Kaplan

  • New algorithms for an ancient scheduling problem

    Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat;Howard Karloff;Rakesh Vohra

  • Optimal oblivious routing in polynomial time

    Yossi Azar;Edith Cohen;Amos Fiat;Haim Kaplan

  • Competitive algorithms for distributed data management

    Yair Bartal;Amos Fiat;Yuval Rabani

  • Batch RSA

    Amos Fiat

  • Highway dimension, shortest paths, and provably efficient algorithms

    Ittai Abraham;Amos Fiat;Andrew V. Goldberg;Renato F. Werneck

  • Associative search in peer to peer networks: harnessing latent semantics

    E. Cohen;A. Fiat;H. Kaplan

  • Tracing Traitors

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Haim Kaplan
Haim Kaplan Tel Aviv University
Michal Feldman
Michal Feldman Tel Aviv University
Yossi Azar
Yossi Azar Tel Aviv University
Stefano Leonardi
Stefano Leonardi Sapienza University of Rome
Yair Bartal
Yair Bartal Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anna R. Karlin
Anna R. Karlin University of Washington
Adi Shamir
Adi Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Edith Cohen
Edith Cohen Tel Aviv University
Moni Naor
Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science
Baruch Awerbuch
Baruch Awerbuch Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of allied online programs. Many students start with a foundational program, such as a 6 month degree course, to develop practical skills and boost employability quickly. These accelerated paths help students fast-track their education and enter the tech workforce sooner.

If you're interested in broader career options, online business degree programs accredited by reputable bodies give you flexibility to study management, entrepreneurship, and analytics—all vital for tech-driven industries. Budget-conscious learners may want to check out the cheapest online bachelors degree programs to minimize student debt while attaining quality education.

For those set on technical or engineering routes, the question often arises: can you get an engineering degree online? Increasingly, the answer is yes, thanks to advancements in remote labs, virtual simulations, and industry partnerships. This flexibility allows you to blend Computer Science with specialized engineering skills, supporting diverse career pathways in today's digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Amos Fiat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles