World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11420 10736 5854 5415 500 27281

John C. Clohisy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John C. Clohisy between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John C. Clohisy published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2020. 49 of the 520 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2020. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 33 publications
1986 2025

520 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John C. Clohisy: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 7
2004 6
2005 8
2006 11
2007 18
2008 11
2009 22
2010 15
2011 30
2012 25
2013 30
2014 21
2015 28
2016 20
2017 27
2018 27
2019 31
2020 39
2021 30
2022 23
2023 24
2024 16
2025 33
Total 520
Download as CSV

John C. Clohisy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Clohisy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 500 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 500
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John C. Clohisy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Clohisy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John C. Clohisy is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a significant focus on surgery. This includes subfields such as orthopedics and sports medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, rheumatology, and biomedical engineering.

The main topics of Clohisy's work concentrate on hip disorders and treatments, orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, shoulder injury and treatment, orthopedic infections and treatments, and hip and femur fractures.

Recent publications by Clohisy include the following papers:

  • Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait, 2020, Journal of Biomechanics
  • Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy for Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia, 2022, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Hitting the Target: Natural History of the Hip Based on Achieving an Acetabular Safe Zone Following Periacetabular Osteotomy, 2020, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • What Mid-term Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores, Reoperations, and Complications Are Associated with Concurrent Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy to Treat Dysplasia with Associated Intraarticular Abnormalities?, 2020, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
  • Inflammatory Response of Articular Cartilage to Femoroacetabular Impingement in the Hip, 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Clohisy often collaborates with several researchers, including Jeffrey J. Nepple, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido, Gail Pashos, Michael D. Harris, and Maria Schwabe.

The frequent venues where Clohisy publishes work are:

  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery
  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®

Best Publications

  • A Systematic Approach to the Plain Radiographic Evaluation of the Young Adult Hip

    John C. Clohisy;John C. Carlisle;Paul E. Beaulé;Young Jo Kim

  • The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement

    Damian Griffin;E.J. Dickenson;E.J. Dickenson;J. O'Donnell;Rintje Agricola

  • Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies

    Yousef Abu-Amer;Isra Darwech;John C Clohisy

  • Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement.

    John C. Clohisy;Evan R. Knaus;Devyani M. Hunt;John M. Lesher

  • The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33).

    Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi;Damian R. Griffin;M. Elizabeth Pedersen;Denise Chan

  • Clinical Presentation of Patients with Tears of the Acetabular Labrum

    R. Stephen J. Burnett;Gregory J. Della Rocca;Heidi Prather;Madelyn Curry

  • Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

    John C Clohisy;George Calvert;Frank Tull;Douglas McDonald

  • Radiographic Evaluation of the Hip has Limited Reliability

    John C. Clohisy;John C. Carlisle;Robert Trousdale;Young Jo Kim

  • Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    John C. Clohisy;Lauren C. St John;Amanda L. Schutz

  • Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopaedic Surgery

    Ernest L. Sink;Michael Leunig;Ira Zaltz;Jennifer Claire Gilbert

  • Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology.

    James A Keeney;Michael W Peelle;Jennifer Jackson;David Rubin

  • Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review.

    John C. Clohisy;Amanda L. Schutz;Lauren St. John;Perry L. Schoenecker

  • Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

    Matthew V Smith;Sandra E Klein;John C Clohisy;Geneva R Baca

  • Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of severe acetabular dysplasia.

    John C. Clohisy;Susan E. Barrett;J. Eric Gordon;Eliana D. Delgado

  • Stimulation of BMP-2 Expression by Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines IL-1 and TNF-α in Normal and Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes

    Naoshi Fukui;Yong Zhu;William J Maloney;John Clohisy

  • Why Do Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Fail

    Ljiljana Bogunovic;Meghan Gottlieb;Gail Pashos;Geneva Baca

  • Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: A North American Cohort of patients undergoing surgery

    John C. Clohisy;Geneva Baca;Paul E. Beaulé;Young Jo Kim

  • The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities.

    John C Clohisy;Ryan M Nunley;Robert J Otto;Perry L Schoenecker

  • Radiographic structural abnormalities associated with premature, natural hip-joint failure.

    John C Clohisy;Michael A Dobson;Jason F Robison;Lucian C Warth

  • High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty.

    Javad Parvizi;Ryan M. Nunley;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Perry L. Schoenecker
Perry L. Schoenecker Washington University in St. Louis
Robert L. Barrack
Robert L. Barrack Washington University in St. Louis
Paul E. Beaulé
Paul E. Beaulé University of Ottawa
William J. Maloney
William J. Maloney Stanford University
Asheesh Bedi
Asheesh Bedi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rick W. Wright
Rick W. Wright Vanderbilt University Medical Center
John J. Callaghan
John J. Callaghan University of Iowa
Javad Parvizi
Javad Parvizi Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
Bryan T. Kelly
Bryan T. Kelly Hospital for Special Surgery

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA offers a wide range of educational and career options beyond the traditional MD path. Many students are now exploring flexible online degrees that can jumpstart a medical or healthcare career—either as an alternative or as a stepping stone to more advanced studies.

For those interested in nursing, affordable pathways are available. If you’re already an RN, you might consider the cheapest bsn programs online to complete your Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Non-nursing majors can look into online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors to become advanced practice nurses without a prior nursing degree.

If you’re seeking the quickest entry into the nursing field, there are also online adn programs for non nurses that provide an Associate Degree in Nursing with minimal prerequisites. Alternatively, for those who want to work in healthcare without direct patient care, online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa offer a way to gain vital administrative skills and qualify for financial aid.

Exploring these online pathways can help you find a flexible, affordable route into America’s growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Clohisy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles