World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
27281
World Ranking
11421
National Ranking
5855

John C. Clohisy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Clohisy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 500 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John C. Clohisy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Clohisy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Clohisy is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a significant focus on surgery. This includes subfields such as orthopedics and sports medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, rheumatology, and biomedical engineering.

The main topics of Clohisy's work concentrate on hip disorders and treatments, orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, shoulder injury and treatment, orthopedic infections and treatments, and hip and femur fractures.

Recent publications by Clohisy include the following papers:

  • Dysplastic hip anatomy alters muscle moment arm lengths, lines of action, and contributions to joint reaction forces during gait, 2020, Journal of Biomechanics
  • Outcomes of Periacetabular Osteotomy for Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia, 2022, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Hitting the Target: Natural History of the Hip Based on Achieving an Acetabular Safe Zone Following Periacetabular Osteotomy, 2020, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • What Mid-term Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores, Reoperations, and Complications Are Associated with Concurrent Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy to Treat Dysplasia with Associated Intraarticular Abnormalities?, 2020, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
  • Inflammatory Response of Articular Cartilage to Femoroacetabular Impingement in the Hip, 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Clohisy often collaborates with several researchers, including Jeffrey J. Nepple, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido, Gail Pashos, Michael D. Harris, and Maria Schwabe.

The frequent venues where Clohisy publishes work are:

  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery
  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®

Best Publications

  • A Systematic Approach to the Plain Radiographic Evaluation of the Young Adult Hip

    John C. Clohisy;John C. Carlisle;Paul E. Beaulé;Young Jo Kim

  • The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement

    Damian Griffin;E.J. Dickenson;E.J. Dickenson;J. O'Donnell;Rintje Agricola

  • Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies

    Yousef Abu-Amer;Isra Darwech;John C Clohisy

  • Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement.

    John C. Clohisy;Evan R. Knaus;Devyani M. Hunt;John M. Lesher

  • The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33).

    Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi;Damian R. Griffin;M. Elizabeth Pedersen;Denise Chan

  • Clinical Presentation of Patients with Tears of the Acetabular Labrum

    R. Stephen J. Burnett;Gregory J. Della Rocca;Heidi Prather;Madelyn Curry

  • Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review.

    John C Clohisy;George Calvert;Frank Tull;Douglas McDonald

  • Radiographic Evaluation of the Hip has Limited Reliability

    John C. Clohisy;John C. Carlisle;Robert Trousdale;Young Jo Kim

  • Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    John C. Clohisy;Lauren C. St John;Amanda L. Schutz

  • Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopaedic Surgery

    Ernest L. Sink;Michael Leunig;Ira Zaltz;Jennifer Claire Gilbert

  • Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology.

    James A Keeney;Michael W Peelle;Jennifer Jackson;David Rubin

  • Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review.

    John C. Clohisy;Amanda L. Schutz;Lauren St. John;Perry L. Schoenecker

  • Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

    Matthew V Smith;Sandra E Klein;John C Clohisy;Geneva R Baca

  • Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of severe acetabular dysplasia.

    John C. Clohisy;Susan E. Barrett;J. Eric Gordon;Eliana D. Delgado

  • Stimulation of BMP-2 Expression by Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines IL-1 and TNF-α in Normal and Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes

    Naoshi Fukui;Yong Zhu;William J Maloney;John Clohisy

  • Why Do Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Fail

    Ljiljana Bogunovic;Meghan Gottlieb;Gail Pashos;Geneva Baca

  • Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: A North American Cohort of patients undergoing surgery

    John C. Clohisy;Geneva Baca;Paul E. Beaulé;Young Jo Kim

  • The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities.

    John C Clohisy;Ryan M Nunley;Robert J Otto;Perry L Schoenecker

  • Radiographic structural abnormalities associated with premature, natural hip-joint failure.

    John C Clohisy;Michael A Dobson;Jason F Robison;Lucian C Warth

  • High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty.

    Javad Parvizi;Ryan M. Nunley;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Perry L. Schoenecker
Perry L. Schoenecker Washington University in St. Louis
Robert L. Barrack
Robert L. Barrack Washington University in St. Louis
Paul E. Beaulé
Paul E. Beaulé University of Ottawa
William J. Maloney
William J. Maloney Stanford University
Asheesh Bedi
Asheesh Bedi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rick W. Wright
Rick W. Wright Vanderbilt University Medical Center
John J. Callaghan
John J. Callaghan University of Iowa
Javad Parvizi
Javad Parvizi Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
Bryan T. Kelly
Bryan T. Kelly Hospital for Special Surgery

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA offers a wide range of educational and career options beyond the traditional MD path. Many students are now exploring flexible online degrees that can jumpstart a medical or healthcare career—either as an alternative or as a stepping stone to more advanced studies.

For those interested in nursing, affordable pathways are available. If you’re already an RN, you might consider the cheapest bsn programs online to complete your Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Non-nursing majors can look into online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors to become advanced practice nurses without a prior nursing degree.

If you’re seeking the quickest entry into the nursing field, there are also online adn programs for non nurses that provide an Associate Degree in Nursing with minimal prerequisites. Alternatively, for those who want to work in healthcare without direct patient care, online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa offer a way to gain vital administrative skills and qualify for financial aid.

Exploring these online pathways can help you find a flexible, affordable route into America’s growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Clohisy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles