World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kay M. Crossley

Kay M. Crossley

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
33846
World Ranking
7438
National Ranking
219

Kay M. Crossley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay M. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 639 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kay M. Crossley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay M. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kay M. Crossley is a researcher affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia. Their academic work focuses primarily on medicine, with specific emphases in surgery, orthopedics and sports medicine, biomedical engineering, rheumatology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's research covers several main topics including sports injuries and prevention, knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, lower extremity biomechanics and pathologies, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, hip disorders and treatments, osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms, and shoulder injury and treatment.

Frequent publication venues for the scientist include:

  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy in Sport
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • Immediate outcomes following the GLA:D® program in Denmark, Canada and Australia. A longitudinal analysis including 28,370 patients with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis, 2021, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Making football safer for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of injury prevention programmes in 11,773 female football (soccer) players, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Risk factors for knee osteoarthritis after traumatic knee injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies for the OPTIKNEE Consensus, 2022, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Patient education improves pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis with better effects when combined with exercise therapy: a systematic review, 2021, Journal of Physiotherapy

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers including Adam G Culvenor, Joanne L. Kemp, Matthew King, Brooke Patterson, and Joshua Heerey.

Best Publications

  • Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS)

    Natalie J. Collins;Devyani Misra;David T. Felson;Kay M. Crossley

  • Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?

    Kay M Crossley;Kim L Bennell;Sallie M Cowan;Sally Green

  • Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

    Sallie M. Cowan;Kim L. Bennell;Paul W. Hodges;Kay M. Crossley

  • Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain - A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

    Kay Crossley;Kim L Bennell;Sally Green;Sallie Cowan

  • 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 1: Terminology, definitions, clinical examination, natural history, patellofemoral osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcome measures

    Kay M Crossley;Joshua J Stefanik;James Selfe;Natalie J Collins

  • Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hip Arthroscopic Surgery

    Joanne L. Kemp;Natalie J. Collins;Ewa M. Roos;Kay M. Crossley

  • Performance on the Single-Leg Squat Task Indicates Hip Abductor Muscle Function

    Kay M. Crossley;Wan-Jing Zhang;Anthony G. Schache;Adam Bryant

  • Balance impairments in individuals with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched controls using clinical tests

    R. S. Hinman;K. L. Bennell;B. R. Metcalf;K. M. Crossley

  • A Systematic Review of Physical Interventions for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

    Kay Crossley;Kim L Bennell;Sally Green;Jenny McConnell

  • Stress Fractures: A Review of 180 Cases

    Peter Brukner;Christopher Bradshaw;Karim M. Khan;Susan White

  • Physical therapy alters recruitment of the vasti in patellofemoral pain syndrome

    Sallie M. Cowan;Kim L. Bennell;Kay M. Crossley;Paul W. Hodges

  • Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial.

    Natalie Collins;Kay Crossley;Elaine Beller;Ross Darnell

  • Musculoskeletal injuries in track and field: incidence, distribution and risk factors.

    Kim L. Bennell;K. Crossley

  • Acupuncture for Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Rana S Hinman;Paul McCrory;Marie V Pirotta;Ian Relf

  • Abnormal knee joint position sense in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

    Vanessa Baker;Kim Bennell;Barry Stillman;Sallie Cowan

  • Efficacy of physiotherapy management of knee joint osteoarthritis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial

    Kim L Bennell;Rana S Hinman;Ben R Metcalf;Rachelle Buchbinder

  • Patellofemoral pain: consensus statement from the 3rd International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat held in Vancouver, September 2013

    Erik Witvrouw;Michael J Callaghan;Joshua J Stefanik;Brian Noehren

  • Is there an alternative to the full‐leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis?

    Rana S. Hinman;Rachel L. May;Kay M. Crossley

  • Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment

    Joaquin Alberto Barrios;Kay M. Crossley;Irene S. Davis

  • 2018 Consensus statement on exercise therapy and physical interventions (orthoses, taping and manual therapy) to treat patellofemoral pain: recommendations from the 5th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Gold Coast, Australia, 2017.

    Natalie J Collins;Christian J Barton;Marienke van Middelkoop;Michael J Callaghan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim L. Bennell
Kim L. Bennell University of Melbourne
Bill Vicenzino
Bill Vicenzino University of Queensland
Rana S. Hinman
Rana S. Hinman University of Melbourne
Marcus G. Pandy
Marcus G. Pandy University of Melbourne
Ali Guermazi
Ali Guermazi Boston University
Karim M. Khan
Karim M. Khan University of British Columbia
Paul W. Hodges
Paul W. Hodges University of Queensland
Hylton B. Menz
Hylton B. Menz La Trobe University
Ewa M. Roos
Ewa M. Roos University of Southern Denmark
Frank W. Roemer
Frank W. Roemer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and fast-growing career pathways in healthcare. For those more interested in the administrative side, the best online healthcare administration degree programs offer flexible options to develop leadership skills for hospital or clinic management roles.

Registered nurses looking to advance can consider asn to nurse practitioner programs, which provide a streamlined track to become nurse practitioners and take on advanced clinical responsibilities.

Nutrition is another critical aspect of healthcare. Those interested in dietetics or nutritional counseling can explore an online degree in nutrition to enter this in-demand field.

For professionals seeking high-level leadership, the cahme accredited online mha programs list provides information on reputable Master's in Healthcare Administration programs that can be completed remotely.

Exploring these online degrees can help you carve out a rewarding healthcare career tailored to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kay M. Crossley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles